Why PSM is casting a wider net in this general election

1
3 views
Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj - Photograph: The Malaysian Insight

Mustafa K Anuar spoke to Sungei Siput MP Dr Michael Jeyakumar Devaraj on PSM’s plans in this general election.

Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) plans to contest in more constituencies in the forthcoming general election in order “to retain a space on the electoral map”.

PSM central committee member Dr Michael Jeyakumar Devaraj said the party was forced to stake a claim because Pakatan Harapan (PH) had so far refused to come to the negotiation table.

Besides, these are places “where we have done work”, added Dr Jeyakumar.

PSM plans to put up its candidates in the parliamentary seats of Sungai Siput, Batu Gajah, Cameron Highlands, Subang and Ulu Langat, while the state seats are Kota Lama (Kelantan), Jelai (Pahang), Semenyih, Kota Damansara and Port Klang (Selangor), and Buntong, Jelapang, Menglembu, Tronoh and Malim Nawar (Perak).

“If PH had included us in their seat negotiations, we could have compromised and reduced the numbers (of seats),” said the respiratory physician.

However, he added, “the road to negotiation is still open, and we have made this known to PH.”

The 2018 general election is very important, said Jeyakumar, who is also Sungai Siput MP, because “there is a real danger that the PH is going to stumble and Barisan Nasional (BN) will come back with a two-thirds majority and a largely non-Malay opposition.

“That would be quite a disaster for the country.”

The 63-year-old doctor said, “The PSM had a difficult task of preserving its toe-hold in the electoral process without upsetting and alienating the PH supporters who are longing for change.

READ MORE:  Pelan tindakan nasional untuk menangani kegawatan ekonomi yang dicetus oleh wabak Covid-19

“PH have excluded the PSM from the electoral platform. Wherever we stand there will be a three-corner fight with BN and PH.

“But we believe that we have a unique contribution to make to the political process in Malaysia.

“For one, we are about the only party that thinks imperialism is still an issue in the 21st century. So, we can’t just fold up and return to being a civil society.”

When asked about his chances of retaining his parliamentary seat of Sungai Siput given the possibility of a three-corner fight, Dr Jeyakumar said, “Extremely grim. My margin of victory was thin – 2700.”

He added that the majority could be easily negated if it is a multi-cornered fight.

“Unless, and I am not sure of this, a significant number of the Sungai Siput voters recognise that I represent a totally new genre in politics and really support it. That would mean that ordinary voters are much smarter than most political leaders think,” he added.

The party is concerned about socio-economic challenges that society is confronted with, particularly inter-ethnic and intra-ethnic economic gaps.

To address these challenges, Jeyakumar said, “We need to recognise the role that the global economic system plays in generating these socio-economic gaps. We then need to renegotiate the engagement of Third World countries in the global economy. We need a new generation of trade agreements.

“We have to stop the commercialisation of basic necessities. That just drives up costs. Basic needs must be provided at affordable prices even if the government needs to subsidise them.

“We need to lobby the idea of a ‘social wage’ because our workers sacrifice to work at wages that are far below the value of their labour. So, it’s a ‘social contract’ not ‘alms to beggars’.

READ MORE:  JAG calls for fresh elections

“We would like to build a people’s movement so that the soft skills required to make people the ‘protagonists’ in society can be built up,” added Jeyakumar, whose vision of a better Malaysia is, among others, better distribution of wealth and inter-ethnic harmony.

Source: themalaysianinsight.com

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mary Chin
29 Apr 2018 7.05am

The least PH supporters can do is to give PH the ultimatum: unless and until PH embraces PSM, we are not voting for PH.

We need a change. PH without PSM is no change. BN and PH are morphologically similar. One says abolish toll fees for both Penang bridges, the other says not both but just one — is that the sort of change we look for?

If GE13 and GE14 have been all about Wan Emdeebee, are GE15 and GE16 going to be all about Penang Undersea Tunnel? How many decades can we afford to lose? Let us think longer term, and think for our children and grandchildren.