When vested interests are cloaked in the people’s robes

1
112 views

People need to ascertain whose interests are really being served when a government decides to craft a certain policy or take stern action in their name and so-called national interests. Mustafa K Anuar writes.

When Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin’s government sought consent recently from Yang di-Pertuan Agong Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri’ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah to declare a state of emergency over the entire federation, Malaysians from all walks of life were predictably overwhelmed by a sense of anxiety and even fear, as such a declaration has wide-ranging implications.

A state of emergency, usually invoked in extreme circumstances, entails specific restrictions – including the suspension of parliamentary democracy and civil liberties – imposed upon society supposedly aimed at protecting the overall wellbeing of ordinary citizens.

In this case, it was supposed to help fight the coronavirus pandemic for the protection of the health of all Malaysians.

On the surface, this would have given the impression that the government was imbued with the noble aim of attending to the people’s interests in the wake of the ravaging pandemic that prompted it declare a state of emergency.

However, as the turn of events recently revealed, the vested interests of the political leaders – that is, to protect their own political survival – took precedence over the larger interests of Malaysians. In other words, the ruling politicians attempted to pursue their narrow agenda under the cover of the ‘people’s or national interests’.

It is noteworthy that in such a situation the politicians concerned are inclined to use words such as “our” or “we” to project an inclusive outlook – and not one that is self-serving. Even such phrases as “saving Malaysia” (read, saving “our nation”) can be usefully employed by different groups for different purposes.

READ MORE:  Jangan sengaja mudaratkan demokrasi Malaysia (Malay/English)

This goes to show that even in a society that has only a semblance of democracy, political leaders who have a certain political design are persuaded to make their narrow agenda appear big enough so that unsuspecting ordinary people may want to claim ownership and subscribe to it.

At the very least, a government, more so one that has got no mandate from the people, would want to be seen as taking steps that supposedly benefit the people. It would be equally important for it to sway the people to accept such measures.

However, the justification for a state of emergency, pursued by Muhyiddin and his cabinet colleagues, was not convincing enough in the face of protests from politicians, civil society organisations and academics, especially when gruesome scenarios in the larger society were presented: capital flight, curbs on the democratic process, investors’ lack of confidence, folded businesses and acute unemployment.

In addition, the material and human resources for healthcare are said to be adequate to handle the spike in Covid-19 infections in the country.

As a result, the emergency proposal did not gain the desired traction among the people or the palace. The social context was not conducive to such a drastic action.

Another instance where the interests or concerns of the people were invoked by the government was the political clampdown codenamed Operation Lalang, executed by Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s administration 33 years ago in the name of protecting national security.

That resulted in the mass arrest of 106 people comprising social activists, politicians and academics under the now-repealed Internal Security Act. In addition, the publishing permits of four publications, known for their critical stance, were revoked.

READ MORE:  Hold government accountable for ill-advised ‘emergency’ attempt

Critics maintained that those arrested had crossed swords with Mahathir over his controversial policies. In short, he brooked no dissent.

The takeaway here: people need to ascertain whose interests are really being served when a government decides to craft a certain policy or take stern action in their name and so-called national interests or national security. Otherwise, they may be taken for a ride.

Source: themalaysianinsight.com

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
loyal malaysian
loyal malaysian
19 Nov 2020 5.51pm

Mustafa, are you being polite?
Are you alluding to the state of emergency declared in Batu Sapi?
Going by that argument, Gerik and that state constituency in Sabah are next.

My political leanings are obvious but with covid 19 spreading in community, a postponement of by-elections afforded by the emergency may not be a bad thing.

I wonder if it is too evil to pray for more state of emergency to be declared in pengkianat nasional constituencies!!