Wage subsidies for employers better than indiscriminate cash handouts

Photograph: Geralt/Pixabay

The stimulus package should not be used as a tool to win political support, Lim Mah Hui says.

The devil is in the details as the saying goes. Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin announced a whopping RM250bn stimulus package on 26 March. This is 17% of Malaysia’s 2019 gross domestic product (GDP).

The direct fiscal injection, ie the government dipping into its till and handing out the funds, is RM25bn or 1.7% of GDP. While this amount is much smaller and manageable, former minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Abdul Wahid Omar said it would push the budget deficit to 6.5% of GDP, from its present 3.5%. Others think the fiscal injection is inadequate.

The questions I will ask are how will it be spent, and is that the best way to spend it?

Firstly, I fully support the need to take a proactive stand to meet and overcome the health crisis that has morphed into an economic crisis and possibly a financial crisis.

Secondly, the priority is to minimise the loss of lives and to protect our health and frontline workers, who are risking their lives to save others.

Thirdly, the government should minimise the impact of economic dislocation and economic suffering of vulnerable segments of society.

Fourthly, the government should not worry about how the stock market reacts. Let the market sort itself out.

Fifthly, because of the size of the budget and the questionable legitimacy of the present cabinet and government, it is all the more imperative that the proposed budget be openly debated in Parliament as is done in most countries, and for as much transparency as possible to be made to the public. For a start, the government should provide a simple breakdown, by categories, of how the money will be spent.

READ MORE:  Urgent need to update records of veterans

A huge chunk of the fiscal injection is used to directly give cash handouts to the bottom 40% of households (households earning less than RM4,000) and middle 40% (households earning between RM4,001-RM8,000).

Every lower-income household will get RM1,600 and every middle-income household will get RM1,000. Singles earning less than RM2,000 will get RM800 and those earning between RM2,001 and RM4,000 will get RM500. Students from tertiary education will get RM200. Pensioners and civil servants of Grade 56 (whose total remuneration is about RM15,000 per month) and below will get RM500 each.

It is not clear how much this adds up to. My rough calculation is this could cost around RM10bn. We are not sure if this is on top of the national Caring Aid of RM10bn to farmers, fisherfolk, etc.

Meanwhile, small businesses, from hoteliers to food and beverage operators and retailers, are all crying for more help. The government has allocated a RM600 wage subsidy to each employee for up to three months, provided they are kept on the payroll. But most of them say this subsidy is inadequate, especially as they face severe cashflow problems.

The way the government has crafted the package raises a host of questions. Does it help those in greatest need? Is it the most effective way to help the needy and keep the economy intact? Is the principle of sharing pain, ie the well to do doing their part to sacrifice a bit of their income for the needy, adhered to? Are some groups getting more at the expense of others?

READ MORE:  Bonus at cost of Sarawak’s vulnerable

It seems the biggest component of the fiscal stimulus is the direct cash handout to individuals and households. I support that workers on the front line, such as health and security personnel, should receive extra income for the risks they undertake.

Assistance should go to those directly affected, ie those who could lose their jobs or wages due to the movement control order. Cash handouts should also be given to the self-employed, such as hawkers, taxi drivers, fisherfolk, farmers and gig workers in the informal sector, not forgetting foreign workers.

But why are the over one million civil servants of Grade 56 (whose salary reaches RM15,000 per month) and below, and pensioners receiving RM500?

They are not affected as they continue to draw salaries even though most, except for essential staff, are not working during this period? Is this a carrot to win their political support for a government that was not voted in by the people as the prime minister himself admitted?

Contrast this with real leadership shown by the Pahang state secretary, who announced that 10,000 civil servants are ready to donate part of their salaries to the Pahang Covid-19 Fund.

Also, such cash handouts are inferior to the wage subsidies to employers for economic and administrative reasons.

Firstly, administratively, it is definitely more efficient and easier to pay directly to the hundreds of thousands of firms or through their EPF accounts, than to the millions of households and individuals.

Secondly, this scheme helps both the firms to stay afloat and also the employees to tide through hard times. The association of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) has said that without adequate assistance, 50% could fold up. According to the Statistics Department, this sector accounts for 98% of total establishments, 65% of employment, and 38% of GDP in Malaysia.

READ MORE:  Bonus at cost of Sarawak’s vulnerable

In contrast, cash handouts to individuals help individuals directly and firms only benefit indirectly through the demand channel. However, if half of SMEs fold up, the supply of goods and services would be severely disrupted while the demand increases. This would result in inflation, something we don’t want at this time.

Countries do not give a 100% wage subsidy, which makes sense. Given the movement control order, the paramount objective is to make sure everyone has access to food and essentials. This is not a time to receive money to spend on discretionary items like new clothes and fancy stuff.

The wage subsidy given to companies for their employees can be calibrated on a sliding scale, with a higher percentage for those with a lower income and a lower percentage for those with a higher income, as part of the principle of pain sharing.

In short, this package should be better scrutinised and fine-tuned. It should be debated and passed in Parliament. It should not be used as a tool to win political support.

Dr Lim Mah Hui is a Penang Forum steering committee member

Source:Free Malaysia Today

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.