TPPA: No use crying over spilt milk!

5
40

Ordinary Malaysians should take the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreeent seriously – and before it is signed, warns Jeyakumar Devaraj.

tppa

Malaysians from all walks of life should really take a close look at the TPPA (Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement) that is now close to completion.

The final round of multilateral negotiations is slated for 20 August in Brunei, and the word is out that it will be signed early next year.

The TPPA is a wide-reaching Trade and Investment agreement that touches almost the whole spectrum of economic life in the participating countries – 12 at the latest count, including the United States, Canada, Mexico, Australia, New Zealand, Chile, Japan, Brunei and Vietnam.

Let me point out some of the problems that would arise if we sign on to this Agreement.

Loss of food security

The US is pushing for the abolition of all import tariffs. At present we have import tariffs on certain foodstuffs – for example, under the WTO regime, we have the right to impose a 40 per cent tax on rice imports. This is important to us as US rice can be sold at below the price of production of rice in Malaysia because the US gives generous subsidies to all its farmers including rice farmers. If cheap US rice floods the Malaysian market, many of the 300,000 rice farmers will go bust.

What is even more serious is that their paddy fields may be converted to housing projects and perhaps golf courses! We now produce 70 per cent of the rice we consume. This may go down if US rice imports are allowed in without tariffs. But when there is a shortage in the world supply of rice as occurred in 2007, then we will be in serious problems. This is why the US heavily subsidises its food producers – to maintain food security.

Price of medicines

FTAs between the US and other countries (there have been 21 signed so far) have driven up the price of medicines in these countries through a combination of measures including:

  • lengthening the patent period from the present 20 years to 25 or even 30 years
  • “evergreening”, whereby a second patent for 20 years is granted to a medicine because a new use of that medicine has been documented. If this second patent is issued on the 15th year of the first, then the effective patent period would go onto 35 years. As you know, the importation of a generic version of that medicine is illegal until the period of the patent expires.
  • Measures to make the registration of generic medicine more difficult. The firms importing generic medicines are prohibited (by the TPPA) from using any information regarding that drug that has been published by the maker of the patented product. All that information is deemed to be the “property” of the patent holder. The term used is “data exclusivity”. That information can be only used if the patent holder gives permission – i.e. on payment of a huge royalty.
  • Measures to limit the practice of “compulsory licensing” and “parallel imports”, which are measures allowed under the GATT Agreement to bring in patented drugs cheaply if there is an emergency need for those medicines in the country.

Loss of regulatory powers and the right of companies to sue governments

The US is also pushing for “investor rights”, specifically something called the “expropriation clause”. The basic argument is that if the host country (Malaysia) expropriates the property of the foreign investor, the latter should have a right to receive reasonable compensation. This sounds fair doesn’t it? The problem is that what actually constitutes “expropriation” is very loosely defined – even regulations that might reduce future profits can be termed “expropriation” and the government concerned can be sued.

There are provisions in the investments chapter that create the right for foreign companies to take the host government to an international court for “expropriating” them – Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS).

When Uruguay asked all the cigarette firms in the country to put pictures of cancers on their cigarette boxes, Philip Morris used an FTA provision to sue the government for hurting its cigarette sales and thus profits! Now Australia is being sued for a similar regulation regarding cigarette packs. There are several such cases in a number of countries. The argument that the regulation was passed to protect the health of the population does not seem to be strong enough!

Several countries have had to pay compensation of millions of dollars for passing regulations that have affected the profits of companies that were having an adverse effect on the health of the people or on the environment of the host nation.

Liberalisation of the service sectors

The US is asking for 100 per cent liberalisation of all the services sub-sectors including health care, retail trade, accounting and education.

The US proposal, and one that they are lobbying hard for, is that any economic activities permitted for Malaysian companies should be allowed of US companies. This is termed “national treatment”.

This would mean, for example, that since Malaysia allows Managed Care Organisations (MCOs) to operate, US MCOs should be allowed to set up branches or even chains here. Since Malaysia allows privately owned supermarkets to operate, there should be no barriers for Walmart to come and set up branches here. There is specifically a provision that states that there should be no restriction on the volume of business permitted for the foreign service provider.

Sure, Walmart might be able to provide certain goods at a 10–20 per cent lower price. But that benefit would be greatly outweighed by damage done to small retail shops and to the pasar malam vendors. Many of them will suffer a loss in volume of sales and they might close up and join the under-employed.

The other negative impact is the amount of money in circulation in our local communities would be reduced by firms such as Walmart. The small grocery shop owner and the pasar malam vendors live in the same community in which they sell their products. Most of the profit they make is ploughed back into the local economy through their consumption and their investment in their businesses. Not so with Walmart! Walmart’s profits will be siphoned out of that locality, thus reducing the money circulating in that locality.

Up till now, all negotiations have been kept top secret. Even parliamentarians do not have a clue of the actual deals being made on our behalf. The US knows that the people would kick up a fuss if the details were known; so they have insisted on complete secrecy.

But given that the deal has almost been made isn’t it time we the people start asking how these issues are being handled, what compromises have been made and exactly which of our rights have been traded away?

The TPPA has 29 chapters and there are several other issues that aren’t quite beneficial to Malaysians. As Idris Jala said in his piece in The Star on 7 August 2013, in a negotiation you have to give in on certain issues. Are we prepared to be the group whose interests had to be sacrificed so that the interest of a more politically important group is preserved?

Ordinary Malaysians should take the TPPA seriously – and before it is signed. No use crying over spilt milk!

(Visited 7 times, 1 visits today)
Thanks for dropping by! You are one of an increasing number of readers looking up Aliran for independent analyses and views. We work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to continue the struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. So would you consider making a donation to keep us going - or why not become an Aliran member or subscribe to our FREE newsletters.
Jeyakumar Devaraj
Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj, a long-time Aliran member and contributor, is the Member of Parliament for Sungai Siput. A respiratory physician who was awarded a gold medal for community service, he is also a secretariat member of the Coalition Against Health Care Privatisation and central committee member of Parti Sosialis Malaysia.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Y.B. Jeyakumar’s concern for the welfare of health of citizens
    is beyond question. He is a fighting a one-man battle. The other
    mps do not support.

    Actually, the crime in the country … Top seniors are (allegedly) involved and one days it will be exposed.

    We congratulate Jeyakumar.

  2. How does the TPPA effect the people of America ?

    TPPA is a Trojan Horse. (TPP) “free trade” agreement is a stealthy policy being pressed by corporate America, (600 mega corporations) A dream of the 1 percent, that in one blow could:

    -offshore millions of jobs,
    -free Wall Street and its banksters from oversight,
    -reduce Internet freedom,
    -ban policies needed to create green jobs and rebuild local economies,
    -decrease access to medicine by extending drug company monopolies,
    -empower corporations to attack our environmental and health safeguards, such as tobacco control and clean air and water regulations. This is how it will effect the people in US and not the 600 mega corporations ( Monsanto, Goldman Sachs, Halliburton, Wal Mart, etc..)

    How more will it effect the participating nations ?

    Closed-door talks are on-going between the U.S. and Australia, Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam; with Japan potentially joining later. 600 corporate advisors have access to the text, while the public, Members of Congress, journalists, and civil society are excluded. It has 26 chapters hidden in a veil of secrecy and they only know about. And so far what we know about what’s in there is very scary!. After exploiting the EEC, these parasites ( Zionist Den of Thieves) are seeking an agreement from its new hosts. Many nations may sit this one out.

    “The TPPA is neither about fair trade nor even about free trade alone, since it seeks to lock in the monopolistic position of big corporations over their industries. It is about ensuring the protection and prioritization of corporate interests above those of public welfare, safety and the socio-economic interests of less affluent economies than the obvious economic master here, which is America.”

    Now what is the difference with this agreement and when India was managed by a corporation (East Indian Company) on behalf of the British for hundreds of years ? What is not mentioned is the expansion of US (Military Industrial Complex) to this part of the Pacific. Has China become a threat to the US ? Is that why there may be a visit of the US President to MSIA in October and a determination to a desired conclusion by December 13 ?

  3. what I am more concerned in the influx of GMO products
    which I think is the secrecy behind this deal.
    Please for Pete sake or God sake, total and complete
    study of their food product has to be upheld.
    There is a bigger conspiracy and TPPA is just icing

  4. America needs this deal more than anyone else, they are already in big big trouble or shall I say they are so heavily in debt that if at all, it will take them not years, not decades and not even a millenium for them to pay off their debt. It will be lucky if the debtors are even able to be paid the interest that is owe on the debt. Yet still America or just like Japan, who is also in big debts, are still going round the world imperiously giving out money they don’t even have.
    Both America and Japan are in trillions of dollars in debt, the only difference between the two countries is the trivial interest that Japan has to pay but the bottom line is they are both in serious financial difficulty.
    Just look at them, they are still going round giving out money with money they don’t have and have to borrow them to give away. Doesn’t that sound familiar, Malaysia too is behaving as though they have plenty of cash in the national coffer ! Just a small reminder to these borrowers , charity begins at home, period !
    America is now trying in the name of trade to cover their big big trouble they are in and if all the debtors, especially China, were to call in their debts or stop allowing the US$ to be used in the market. America would have gone to the dogs and cats and would not be going around acting like they are self appointed police men of the world.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here