The immorality of party defections

2
253
Cartoon by Zunar

In future general elections, choose candidates of moral integrity, and they should be made to make public pledges that they will not betray the trust of the people, Ronald Benjamin writes.

In Malaysian politics we have reached a state of moral crisis where the electoral mandate of the people has been taken for granted by self-serving politicians.

The latest defections by Azman Nasiruddin (Lunas) and Robert Ling (Sidam) in the Kedah State Assembly is a consequence of historical neglect by the previous Barisan Nasional (BN) government and even Pakatan Harapan (PH) on grasping the far-reaching implications of such defections and behaviour on the integrity of the people’s mandate and the moral credibility of the government.

It should not be forgotten that it was the moral distrust of the majority of the electorate that brought down the kleptocratic government of Najib Razak.

It was hoped that a new dawn would emerge with PH in power, which would bring about changes that would enhance electoral integrity. Unfortunately, the coalition was held hostage by power play and ethnic politics, which had all the flavours of racism instead of the common good. There should have been more focus on maruah rakyat (the dignity of the people) than maruah Melayu (the dignity of the Malays).

Looking at the history of party defections, the BN government has been the main beneficiary due to its strong ethnocentric politics and financial means. A government by the people and for the people is projected in form rather than substance during general elections.

What can one expect from the current Perikatan Nasional (PN) government, which is helmed by immoral politicians from the past and present?

READ MORE:  So many issues to debate - but pretend-only parliament adjourned after just two hours!

The defections of Umno MPs from Bersatu should not have been allowed at that time when PH was in power, and the coalition should have initiated a law to prevent defections. One would assume that Umno would have supported an anti-defections law back then, when its own MPs were jumping ship. Time and opportunities were wasted. There were voices from DAP youth and PKR opposing such crossovers, but not strong enough to get the PH presidential council to reject such defections.

Formulating a law to prevent defections would require passing constitutional hurdles. Article 48(1) and Part I(6) of the Eight Schedule of the Federal Constitution do not state that defections will lead to an MP or state assembly member being disqualified.

Article 48(6) states that a person who resigns his membership of the house of representatives shall, for a period of five years, beginning from the date on which his resignation takes effect, be disqualified from being a member. Politicians could be reluctant to vacate their seat due to this aspect of the law.

The article was added to the Constitution in a 1990 amendment tabled and passed during Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s former administration.

All this was done from a position of power and strength without having the wisdom of understanding that it would backfire someday.

The backdoor PN government currently finds legitimacy of power by providing favourable positions in government-linked companies to dissenting MPs. Coming up with a law to prevent defections is not possible under a government that has benefited from people defecting to its side.

READ MORE:  Pakej rangsangan harus dibincangkan di sidang Parlimen tergempar (Malay/English)

The ball goes back to the people in the next general election to choose candidates of moral integrity, and those candidates should be made to make public pledges that they will not in any way betray the trust of the people.

Source: themalaysianinsight.com

Sign Aliran's 'Save our Democracy" petition
Sign Aliran's petition calling for a review of the decision to grant Riza Aziz a DNAA
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Santana
Santana
4 Jun 2020 12.32pm

Our politicians generally join politics for the perks, power and to get rich in the shortest possible time. They can all make promises and pledges before the election. Once they are elected whatever said and done before election is forgotten. The behaviour of politicians are just the reflection of values in our society as a whole. There are very few people who are honest and truthful. People with such qualities do not wish to join politics because politics is a dirty game. So we can’t expect the state of Malaysian politics to change for the better in the next one to two decade.

Gursharan Singh
Gursharan Singh
4 Jun 2020 11.19am

 
 
Question is WHERE TO FIND CANDIDATES WITH MORAL INTEGRITY
and even if they have integrity-morals-honesty
BEFORE ELECTIONS MOST MAY BE PERCEIVED TO SOON LOSE THESE VALUES DUE TO THE MANY OPPORTUNITY FOR EASY QUICK WEALTH FOR SELF GREED WITH LITTLE CHANCE OF BEING CAUGHT OR PUNISHED?
 
PLEDGES IN RESPECT OF ‘ANTI-CORRUPTION’-‘ETHICS’-‘HONESTY’-etc HAVE BEEN MADE BY VARIOUS TYPES OF LEADERS AND CIVIL SERVICE OFFICERS & ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS IN THE PAST WITH SOME IN GRAND CEREMONIES BUT HAS THESE PLEDGES HAD ANY VISIBLE POSITIVE RESULTS OR CHANGES as most may have become COSMETICS & PR.