Political financing through foundations, corruption and the pursuit of power

50 views

The Center to Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4 Center) demands answers regarding the vulnerabilities inherent in foundations or “yayasan” being controlled by political parties and being used as war chests during political campaigns, especially since little to no attention has been brought to this matter.

“Foundations and Donations: Political Financing, Corruption, and the Pursuit of Power” is the title of the report launched by C4 Center recently on political funding through donations in Malaysian politics, which features case studies involving prominent politicians such as Najib Razak, Zahid Hamidi and Adnan Mansor.

The report also explores the various methods politicians’ exerted control over such foundations and raises questions about the nexus between policies and selective patronage.

There needs to be answers on how foundations helmed or founded by politicians, including Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin and opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim, can be used to provide specific aid to the constituencies of such politicians, especially when established as charities or organisations meant to fund social and community programmes or as a focal point for religious pursuits.

Examples here include the TSM Charity Golf Foundation, which has accumulated more than RM27m in donations since its inception in 2003, and has channelled approximately RM24m to charitable projects. However, food donations were also made by the foundation in the name of Bersatu Hulu Selangor and Bersatu Lembah Pantai, which reflects a political agenda within the social cause.

Another example is Yayasan Aman, founded by Anwar and helmed by his wife, Dr Wan Azizah Wan Izmail, which provided aid specifically to Port Dickson and Pandan, the constituencies of Anwar and Wan Azizah, respectively.

READ MORE:  Police chief’s revelations: Bar supports establishment of royal commission of inquiry

Answers are also needed about how there can be vulnerabilities in the system when it comes to foundations – by nature of the foundations being under the personal control of political persons, nepotism through family foundations as well as abuse of power, which can be used to circumvent rules, such as those regarding audits and filing financial reports. That this has gone unmentioned at all is a black mark against Malaysian politics.

Ultimately, while there are indeed foundations that do proper charity work, and while political donations are a legitimate means of raising campaign funds, it is when the two intersect that things get murkier, as the vulnerability for quid pro quo arrangements exists, meaning the system itself is vulnerable to corruption by those in power.

The full report on Foundations and Donations: Political Financing, Corruption, and the Pursuit of Power is available for download at c4center.org

  • The full report is here
  • Copy of slides presented by Prof Edmund Terence Gomez and Lalitha Kunaratnam, authors of the report, available for download here

Center to Combat Corruption & Cronyism (C4 Center)

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gursharan Singh
Gursharan Singh
28 Apr 2021 10.59am

Is it possible that those in postions of power and leadership may not have been aware of the many weaknesses/lapses in the CONSTITUTION of YAYASAN FUNDS when the Rules/Procedures and Monitoriing/Audit provisions were designed?
Or could it be perceived that it was the objective as it may have provided opportunities for those in power to abuse of YAYASAN FUNDS for personal benefit as may have been evidenced by the several suspected cases under investigations by relevant enforcement Authorities?
COULD THIS BE A COMMON CULTURE IN OTHER COUNTRIES?

Bless all