Legitimacy of a no-confidence motion

The general election losers are now ruling the country

In response to a motion of no-confidence by Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah against the prime minister, Speaker Art Harun stated that government businesses should take precedent over private motions. BFM speaks to Surendra Ananth, co-chairperson of the Malaysian Bar’s constitutional law committee, for his thoughts on the issue.

Produced by Tasha Fusil

Presented by Lee Chwi Lynn and Hezril Asyraaf

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
loyal malaysian
loyal malaysian
19 Oct 2020 8.02am

Where Art thou?
Away in his chambers, enjoying the dedak provided by the backdoor PM?

Thank you Surendra and BFM for giving this explanation with respects the no-confidence motion against the backdoor PM.
Is the motion really putting our nation into political turmoil?
I beg to differ – the current backdoor government lacks legitimacy!
If it can win that vote of no-confidence, all the frogs and leeches in that government can hold their heads up high – I , for one will no longer dare to call it a backdoor government!!