How Australia helps the US destabilise Asia

The Aukus signatories - CANUCKGUY ET AL/WIKIPEDIA

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

By Max Lane

15 September marked the third anniversary of the announcement of the Aukus Australia-UK-US (Aukus) agreement.

The purpose of this agreement is for Australia to buy nuclear-powered submarines from the UK and the US. This increases interoperability with US forces that are projecting their power in the region along the Chinese coast.

Furthermore, Australia is participating in the Quad and Squad, “[i]nformal Alliances in the Indo-Pacific“.

The city of Darwin in northern Australia has been opened up for the US forces, including planes carrying nuclear weapons. In addition, Australia has long housed bases for US spy satellite systems. (For details of all these agreements, visit antiaukuscoalition.)

All this is consistent with history. The Australian capitalist class shares the understanding of the Global North versus Global South relationship and realises that the ruling class’s best interest is in the Global North’s continued domination.

The increased capacity of China to resist US hegemony, even if it is unable to defeat it, is seen as a threat. The hegemonic discourse in the media always refers to China as an adversary. In Australia, this is accentuated when talking about Australian imperialism’s “own backyard”.

Member of the ‘Global Imperialist Club’

For at least 150 years, Australia has been integrated into the network of rich industrialised countries, much of whose wealth comes from colonial and modern imperialist exploitation of what is now called the Global South.

Although a small imperialist economy, some of its biggest capitalists have investments in Global South countries, as far apart as Indonesia and Chile.

READ MORE:  Global analysis: US, China, India, Middle East - Mearsheimer and Sachs

Australia has one of the highest gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in the world. Its wealth stems from this exploitation and from sharing in the exploitation of the Global South by the imperialist bloc.

Its initial wealth, accumulated in the 18th and 19th Centuries, was based on and boosted by a genocidal invasion. The latter enabled the theft of the continent’s land from its original inhabitants.

In foreign and security policies, the Australian state and the majority of the capitalist class have always believed that they shared the same strategic interests of the imperialist bloc. Since World War Two, they have also shared the strategic interests of the US.

In relation to Asia, the Australian state has shared the understanding with the US that a socialist revolution in Asia is a threat to all imperialist interests.

Since 1945, the Australian ruling class has waged a massive propaganda campaign among the Australian people on the “yellow peril” of communist China and left-wing movements in Southeast Asia.

In addition, Australian troops were involved in South Korea, Malaya and Indonesia before Vietnam. Even before the US committed to the war in Vietnam, the Australian government was urging the US to get involved.

Contradictions for Australia’s capitalist class

There is a contradiction for Australian capital as a whole. “Over the past five years, the exports of Australia to China have increased at an annualised rate of 7.76%, from $84.8bn in 2017 to $123bn in 2022,” according to the Observatory of Economic Complexity.

China usually tops the list of countries that Australia exports to. The current Australian government is doing all it can to improve business ties with China, including recently feting the Chinese Premier and other delegations. Commercial relations have also improved.

READ MORE:  Is China producing too much?

At the same time, in the political sphere, anti-Chinese propaganda continues strongly. Open public dissent against Aukus or similar policies from within the capitalist class or pro-capitalist politicians is minimal.

The one outspoken critic is former Labor Prime Minister Paul Keating who argues that China is no security threat to Australia, that Taiwan belongs to China, and that the Australian economy needs the best possible economic relations with China.

Opposition to Aukus

The opposition is weak and comes from the left and some centre-left Greens parliamentarians.

There are two main elements to the Australian left.

The Greens party is a moderate left-of-centre party with a small representation in the Senate and the House of Representatives. They oppose Aukus, emphasising the waste of money, erosion of defence sovereignty to the US, and the environmental impacts of storing nuclear waste. While it publishes progressive statements on China not being a threat, it does not seem to stress the same. The Greens do not initiate or lead mass campaigns or protests.

The peace movement and the far left include the Independent and Peaceful Australia Network and the Australian Anti-Aukus Coalition. While active, these organisations are small and weak, with minimal public profile or impact. This reflects the 20-year decline of radical left organisations in Australia, especially those whose political perspective makes the Global North versus Global South struggle (imperialism) a major or basic framework. These groups’ statements are therefore often slightly more radically worded versions of the Greens’.

Nobody campaigns around the slogan “China is not an enemy” nor links US containment of China to imperialism.

READ MORE:  Nato accelerates its conflict with China

Solutions

There is no magic solution to this weakness. The only way to undo the damage is by patiently explaining and helping build actions and a movement against imperialism.

One factor that may help this process is increasing the voices of the people’s movements of Asia on these questions among the Australian public, and especially among Australian youth who are beginning to raise questions on this issue.

More visits to Australia by Asian friends would educate people with an imperialist perspective on the destabilising impact of US and Australian policies.

This is urgent and very useful, and we must figure out how to overcome the infrastructural and financial challenges involved in achieving this goal. – Globetrotter

Max Lane is a writer and commentator on Asian and southeast Asian affairs and Australia’s relations with Asia. He has lectured at universities in Australia, Indonesia, Singapore and the Philippines, as well as in the US and Europe. Over the last 50 years, he has written for the Canberra Times, Nation Review, National Times and Green Left Weekly. He has written, edited and translated over 20 books on Indonesia. This article is based on a 17 August 2024 “United States Destabilising East Asia” online webinar by No Cold War.

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.
AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support Aliran's work with an online donation. Scan this QR code using your mobile phone e-wallet or banking app:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Siti
Siti
29 Sep 2024 3.22am

Basically it’s the West ( whites) who support Whites ie Australia, NZ, USA and UK . The whites want to run the world and maintain world domination,

Alia
Alia
4 Oct 2024 8.29am
Reply to  Siti

Totally agree. Australia is doing the bidding of the US in its quest to remain the hegemon in this region. Aust should instead be cultivating genuine relationships in the Asia Pacific region and recognise that its future lies in this region and create an independent foreign policy instead of being subservient to the US and blindly following US instructions on how to conduct its foreign relations.