Don’t allow foul language in Parliament

4
70
Photograph: Wikimedia Commons

This use of foul, four-letter words in Parliament must be condemned severely, says JD Lovrenciear.

Last month, we heard of the universally unacceptable four-letter word flying across Parliament. And all seems to have ended well with a mere “I retract” by the MP.

What kind of elected representatives do we have? What values are we sowing for the future of this nation? Are we saying that profanities and obscenities freely traded within the immunity provided by Parliament is fine?

No matter how angry or frustrated an MP can be, it is his or her moral and categorical duty to argue, convince the house and stand tall with admiration from both sides of the divide. When MPs fail – with some even being celebrated as no-holds-barred loose cannons – it gives citizens a hopeless feeling.

This outburst of foul, four-letter words must be condemned severely. Or else, we allow shame and disrespect to destroy this country.

Thanks for dropping by! Apart from the views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed, the opinions in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation of whatever amount you can afford to sustain Aliran. Please make payments to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.

And why not become an Aliran member or subscribe to our FREE newsletters.

4
Join the conversation

avatar
750
4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
Richard Ng Ting WoongFrank TanSea Tea OonYvonne Yuen Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Richard Ng Ting Woong

Parliament by itself should set a good example ,but instead it’s the opposite. The speaker must down the rules n before it.

Sea Tea Oon

Learn fr Singapore parliament. Professionally conducted & respected. 61 years Msia still so uncivilised.

Frank Tan

Love our country and debate with open mind and love. Narrow minded and closed minded politician is not a matured politician. Love binds life Hate destroys life destroy our country. We need more spiritual leaders rather than religious leaders. Hopefully our religious leaders can be more spiritual.

Yvonne Yuen

Should also include obscene hand gestures