Cut PM’s office spending, mega projects to curb ballooning public debt, says economist

2
458

Servicing the interest on high public debt diverts funds from other sectors that would benefit the people. Bede Hong of The Malaysian Insight reports.

Unchecked overspending by the prime minister’s office and disproportionate allocation of development funds have led to the official government debt fast approaching RM700bn, said a prominent economist.

Former United Nations assistant secretary-general Jomo Kwame Sundaram said there was an urgent need for greater transparency and accountability in off-budget infrastructure spending, which is not part of the federal government budget and is thereby unaccountable to Parliament.

“What Malaysia needs now is more appropriate development expenditure, not yet more operating expenditure, especially for the PMO (prime minister’s office), which has grown more than tenfold and has centralised power like never before,” Jomo told The Malaysian Insight in a telephone interview recently.

“Meanwhile, most infrastructure spending is not on the federal budget and often involves dubious public-private partnerships, further reducing transparency and accountability, as (witnessed in) the recent rush to start the ECRL (East Coast Rail Line).”

Jomo recommended that allocations to the prime minister’s office be slashed to lower rising debt.

The prime minister’s office was allocated RM17.43bn in Budget 2018, almost double the RM8.938bn it received in 2008.

Mega-projects such as the ECRL, Tun Razak Exchange, and Bandar Malaysia should also be scrutinised by an independent bipartisan parliamentary committee chaired by a member of the opposition party, said Jomo.

In the case of the 688km ECRL, should the rail system, which costs RM55bn, nearly 8% of Malaysia’s public debt, fail to generate the expected level of demand and return on investment, it can put the government highly in debt to China.

READ MORE:  Malaysians expect a Budget with a difference

“ECRL would never pay for itself. Right now, the estimated government debt is large and it is growing very fast. When you talk about debt, you have to consider both the official debt as well as the government guaranteed debt.

“And because there’s no accountability for the government guaranteed debt, there’s a lot of room for hanky panky. There’s hardly any reporting and so on.”

Jomo said there was also a need to prevent abuse of public-private partnerships, as “ultimately it is the public that bears the costs or the bulk of the risks, while the profits mainly accrue to the private partner”.

Jomo, a visiting fellow at the Khazanah Research Institute, has been a vocal critic of the government’s rising operational expenditure, which has grown an average 6% yearly for the last 10 years.

Operations spending grew from RM123.10bn in 2007 to RM219.91bn in 2017, exceeding Malaysia’s revenue which grew at an average of 4.9% yearly since 2007, when revenue stood at RM139.9bn to RM225.34 bn in 2017.

Federal debt during the same period rose 10% annually from RM123bn in 2007 to RM687.43bn as at September 2017.

A recent report by The Edge Markets revealed that going by an annual growth rate of 10.7%, Malaysia’s debt could reach RM1 trillion by 2021 on excessive spending.

By the same projection, Malaysia’s debt could reach RM2tn in 2028 and RM3tn in 2032.

Funds diverted to service debt

Jomo said high public debt, if left unaddressed in the long-term, would put the country at risk of default.

READ MORE:  Malaysians expect a Budget with a difference

“Taking on debt for productive uses is generally desirable. However, much of the recent debt is not being used productively.

“Also, the government should be paying down debt or reducing debt when the economy is growing and incurring debt when there is a slowdown.

“However, for the last 10 years or more, we have just been taking on more and more debt, even when we claim the economy is growing well, which is usually seen as fiscally irresponsible,” he said.

Jomo said servicing the interest for high public debt diverted funds from other sectors which would benefit the people such as healthcare or education.

“Apparently that is the case in Malaysia, where allocations to public universities have been cut by more than half in the last two years,” he said.

While he acknowledged the need for development expenditure for the economy to progress, Jomo said the funding should be more targeted and “appropriate”.

“They should fund research, for example, to increase the productivity of oil palm by increasing its productive life span to 90 years from the current 25 years.

“Malaysia’s most successful industrialisation story is not electronics, which is controlled by foreign companies, but palm oil, which is controlled by Malaysia,” he said.

Source: The Malaysian Insight, 4 February 2018

(Visited 453 times, 1 visits today)
Thanks for dropping by! Apart from the views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed, the opinions in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.

2
Join the conversation

avatar
750
2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Wengseng ChanKhoo+Soo+Hay Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Wengseng Chan

Rakyat wants this done.

Khoo+Soo+Hay
Khoo+Soo+Hay

Now in our country under the present government, there no more checks and balances. Top civil servants are more concerned with their rice bowls than to complain about unrestrained and unnecessary spending by our Ministers. No one dare to express the truth. All are looking after their pensions. The good ones are hoping that the next GE 14 will liberate them from their inability to speak and act the truth, without having to fear for their pensions.