Anti-intellectualism – the death knell of our nation

4
Perak mufti Harussani Zakaria

Islam promoted education, intellectualism and discourse; it did not want Muslims to go down the path that led to the Dark Ages, notes Syerleena Abdul Rashid.

There is a growing cult of ignorance taking shape in our own backyard which has stirred quite a number of controversial incidents lately.

From love seats to K-pop to camels to PG13-rated child birth pants, the anti-progressive interpretations of religious doctrines are getting out of hand. To be honest, it has left a number of us feeling uneasy.

Malaysia is destroying itself through its acceptance of ignorance and reverence of false self-declared prophets.

Recently, the Perak mufti openly declared war against intellectualism by falsely claiming that intellectualism is influenced by desires, therefore (making it) susceptible to the devil.

“I advise them not to go overboard. Islam is based on faith… Don’t make any remarks based on the intellect or logic because they are laws of Allah… the intellect is governed by desires and it is influenced by shaitan (satan). Don’t be ruled by desires and rudderless comments.”

Unfortunately, such a mindset is not uncommon in our society these days, and we can thank growing sentiments that endorse anti-intellectualism, a dangerous disease that has contaminated our public institutions and rational discourse.

Contrary to what the Perak mufti wants us to believe, Islam upholds intellectualism and encourages us to search for knowledge. Prophet Muhammad required Muslims to get the best out of education – seek the path of enlightenment and knowledge, for ignorance is a sin.

Unfortunately, the modern world (and those who think like our dear Perak mufti) seems to have forgotten how Islamic civilisation rose to prominence in 610AD and lasted until the early 20th century – a period better known as the Golden Age of Islam.

READ MORE:  Transgender problem in Malaysia exposes our bigotry, hypocrisy

Numerous Muslim scientists and other prominent intellectuals showered the continent with noteworthy accomplishments and made immeasurable contributions to development in areas including modern medicine, chemistry and algebra. Learning institutions were also established in places like present day Damascus, Cairo and Cordoba, which would later serve as models for modern European universities.

Islam promoted education, intellectualism and discourse; it did not want Muslims to go down the path that led to the Dark Ages.

Our problem is how religion is now being loosely (or harshly – depending on how you see it) interpreted by those who speak with forked tongues and how inept our education system has become. We give too much space for them to broadcast their illogical analyses, but we are too embarrassed to admit that we have become disconnected from the modern world that surrounds us.

By now, Malaysians are well aware that we live in a country where elected representatives and ministers can threaten citizens with violence, fallacious reports and even parade their ill-gotten gains brazenly in front of us.

The Malaysia we have learned to loathe, but still deeply love, is managed by the overly pious who constantly remind Malaysians not to question certain directives as they supply us with our daily dose of lies upon lies.

The toxic concoction of arrogance and ignorance will signal the death knell of our great nation. Regrettably, there are no quick remedies for this pandemic, no short cuts to get us out from this cesspool of stupidity and irrational thinking.

READ MORE:  Spying is against Islam

Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, “The mind of this country, taught to aim at low objects, eats upon itself.”

Malaysians live in a society that accepts this false sense of democracy that has taken on a bizarre twist – ignorance is just as good as knowledge and malicious anti-intellectualism is now seen as a positive trait while uneducated ideals are accepted as fact.

Gullibly giving in to those who preach anti-intellectualism is one thing, but blindly following those who mask false doctrines through faith drenched in pseudo-intellectual sermons is far more detrimental to society than one can ever imagine.

What this simply means for average Malaysians like us: we will need to propagate the message of hope and rationality, and soldier on.

Source: themalaysianinsider.com

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hj. Umar
Hj. Umar
21 Aug 2015 10.31am

Here is the original article paragraphing as it is still shown in the google cache of the article:

“Malaysia is destroying itself through its acceptance of ignorance and reverence of false self-declared prophets. Recently, the Perak mufti openly declared war against intellectualism by falsely claiming that intellectualism is influenced by desires, therefore (making it) susceptible to the devil.”

see:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:PfSeljKbJsQJ:aliran.com/web-specials/2015-web-specials/anti-intellectualism-the-death-knell-of-our-nation/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk

You’ve now separated the first sentence from the remainder of the paragraph, in both the article itself and in my comment responding to it. Separating the first sentence of the paragraph from the remainder to change the context in both the article and the comment and then telling a commenter who read the article for what it was to “read more carefully” after making that change is disingenuous. I’ve saved the google cache to my computer using the print screen function, so there’s really no getting out of it.

My advice to you: in future, please take your own advice to “read more carefully”, reciting it in a mirror before approving such articles.

ARHanafi
21 Aug 2015 12.21am

Mufti Harussani in his statement referring to the currently rumoured plot to topple a legally elected leadership is haram. We don’t dispute that. But what puzzles us is that when the Perak state government under Pakatan Rakyat was forcibly ousted unconstitutionaly in 2006 under his very nose as the mufti of Perak he was silent and didn’t do anything about it. Can we presume that the currently rumoured plot to replace the current leadership is haram while the Perak coup is legitimate? This same mufti has, on several past occasions made statements and unfounded allegations that confused the public.. We don’t need to elaborate on that. You know it. Morality should not be imposed. An imposed morality is not morality. One who leads a moral life out of fear is not a moral person because he has not made choices freely. Threats and fear to force people into accepting their morality do not make the society moral – Afghanistan, Sudan, Libya and many other Muslim societies are prime examples of morally imposed societies. They do nothing except fighting, killing and bombing one another on a daily… Read more »

Hj. Umar
Hj. Umar
19 Aug 2015 10.59pm

Can you prove that Perak mufti Harussani Zakariak claimed that he is a “self-declared prophet”, viz.: “Malaysia is destroying itself through its acceptance of ignorance and reverence of false self-declared prophets. Recently, the Perak mufti openly declared war against intellectualism by falsely claiming that intellectualism is influenced by desires, therefore (making it) susceptible to the devil.” Pretending to be a prophet after Rasulullah Muhammad SAW is a major crime and sin in Islam and I would like to see when, where and how he made such a preposterous claim if indeed he did (which I don’t believe for one second that he did). And the mufti is correct in stating that “…the intellect is governed by desires and it is influenced by shaitan (satan). Don’t be ruled by desires and rudderless comments.” Using the intellect, one can construct perfectly logical but stupid arguments that go completely against religion. For example, in the West Christianity has destroyed itself by abusing the “Judge not lest ye be judged” view of the New Testament to the point that no one dares question anyone else’s actions no matter how deviant… Read more »

admin
admin
20 Aug 2015 9.55pm
Reply to  Hj. Umar

Please read carefully before making accusations. Syerleena didn’t say Harussani had claimed to be a prophet.