Why we should kiss the RM46bn ‘PTMP’ goodbye

7
2139

Anil Netto explains why a sustainable mobility plan should replace the ill-fated reclamation-driven “transport plan”.

The coronavirus pandemic has given us some space to reflect on the so-called “Penang Transport Master Plan” – in reality, a developers’ plan to reclaim three islands in the name of providing extravagant transport infrastructure for Penang.

The idea was that the state government’s sale of reclaimed land would raise funds to finance the RM46bn transport infrastructure proposed by SRS Consortium. The consortium is 60% owned by construction giant Gamuda with two Penang-based developers controlling 20% each.

The 4,500-acre three-island project in Penang was supposed to house over 446,000 people, most of them in expensive homes. Many of them would probably be foreign buyers, likely from China.

Reality check: foreign buyers, themselves reeling from the pandemic and a severe recession in their own countries, are now unlikely to be coming to Malaysia soon.

Let’s learn from the Dubai experience and see how the emirate city is struggling with its own overly ambitious land reclamation plans (see video above).

Covid-19 has left property prices in a slump, not only in Penang but also globally, especially as more people including the young are now unemployed.

One sign of this is that people can barely afford to buy even the so-called ‘affordable homes’ in Penang, forcing the state government to reduce the prices of homes above RM72,000 by 10%. So affordable homes on Penang Island that were priced from RM150,000 to RM300,000 will now go for RM135,000 to RM270,000. (What about all those add-ons like “renovation costs” and “car parks”?)

To clear the large glut of high-end homes, the eligibility threshold for foreigners has been slashed by 20% for apartments and a staggering 40% for landed property. This means foreigners will now be allowed to buy apartments on the island priced upwards from RM800,000 (instead of previously RM1m) and landed property priced at RM1.8m (previously RM3m).

Instead of forcing high-end developers to take a ‘haircut’ and reduce their prices to bring them within reach of local spending power, what we have here is a rescue plan for developers allowing them to flog off more of their expensive homes to elusive wealthy foreign buyers.

READ MORE:  Is PTMP a Trojan horse for 'Penang South Islands' agenda?

This is a clear sign that the forecast selling prices of homes on the proposed three islands have been overrun by current market conditions. This downturn will affect the prices that the state government had hoped it could fetch for the sales of reclaimed land to developers.

This plunge in real estate values has thrown the financial model for the PTMP upside down. Remember, revenue from the sale of reclaimed land amounting to RM70bn was supposed to have financed the over-the-top Penang transport infrastructure.

To make matters worse, a prominent economist, Nouriel Roubini, who predicted the 2008 global financial crisis, says the world is heading for a prolonged U-shaped or close to an L-shaped “Greater Depression” that could last a decade.

Even if you don’t agree with Roubini’s alarming forecast, it will take years for the property market to reach pre-coronavirus levels, when prices were already flagging. Let’s not forget that the other massive reclamation projects now in progress in northeast and eastern Penang Island will add more high-end homes to the glut in the coming years.

And then, there are the ecological problems that will haunt the project. Even before reclamation in southern Penang Island could begin, we have just heard reports of thousands of dead fish in Penang and Perak, apparently from aquaculture farms. What triggered this toxic algae bloom or red tide is still unclear. Wild fish were not affected.

But wild fish will be hit when the three-island land reclamation degrades, if not destroys, the prime fishing waters and breeding grounds off the southern coastline of Penang Island.

It is not just the NGOs who have warned of the harmful impact of land reclamation on the marine ecology. In December 2007 just months before Pakatan Rakyat captured Penang, the political secretary of a top DAP official, in a statement released in Chinese, called for a ban on land reclamation in Penang. “The Penang state government must immediately order the prohibition of all reclamation projects to avoid serious damage to the marine ecology!”

READ MORE:  Penang government has no power to issue bonds without federal approval

Late last month, we heard that plans by Gamuda to divest its highways to the federal government for over RM6bn – a figure which some reportedly felt was too high – may have been aborted.

It remains a mystery where the working capital for the project will come from. Even before the coronavirus pandemic, the working capital requirements for the PTMP seemed to be rising – presumably the effect of a sliding property market eroding revenue from projected sales of reclaimed land.

This prompted the Penang government to announce last year it would soon issue a RM10bn sukuk bond to finance the Komtar-Bayan Lepas elevated light rail project (which presumably would be repaid from revenue raised from the sale of reclaimed land). The state government said the then-Pakatan Harapan government in Putrajaya would grant a federal government guarantee for the bond financing, raising concern that the public would be exposed to huge debt if the project ran into problems.

Such a staggering amount of bond financing was not mentioned in the original SRS proposal for financing in the PTMP put forward to the Penang Transport Council, when I was in it. What we had before us back then was much smaller “bridging finance”, ie about RM2bn, which was said to be the “finance gap” (the shortfall due the timing of projected cashflows) as late as three years ago. Apart from this RM2bn-ringgit finance gap, the PTMP model was supposed to be self-financing. So how did this “finance gap” balloon to RM10bn last year (ie 12 times the state government’s annual budget)? This alone is reason enough to ditch the PTMP.

With the cash-strapped backdoor federal government now led by Perikatan Nasional, the PH Penang government may not find it easy to secure approval for this RM10bn bond financing backed by a federal government guarantee.

READ MORE:  Get the basics right first: Walk before you sprint

Already, the PN federal government has correctly refused to provide a RM100m allocation for the ecologically problematic cable car project in Penang Island.

We have lost almost a decade in sensible transport planning just because some politicians and their contractor-and-developer partners had misguided grandiose plans for Penang – like Dubai once had.

Let’s put the ill-fated PTMP out of its misery and come up with a more sustainable mobility plan. No need for six-lane highways tunnelling through sensitive hill slopes or expensive elevated rail systems. Save, also, the RM50m to be spent on wastefully widening Mount Erskine Road and use that money to improve the bus system for the whole of Penang.

Now that the roads in Penang are less congested than before, let’s learn from what enlightened city planners are doing in developed nations to make their streets friendlier for pedestrians, cyclists and buses while discouraging the use of private vehicles.

If the Penang government really believes in a “green agenda”, it should go back to the drawing board and commission independent sustainable mobility experts to produce a genuine sustainable mobility plan that doesn’t focus on cars and highways – and dump the ecologically harmful land reclamation. It could take a leaf from the blueprint, produced by transport consultants Halcrow, which preceded the PTMP. The federal government, for its part, must back call for a sustainable mobility plan as a more viable alternative to the PTMP. That is, if both political coalitions really have the people’s interests – rather than vested corporate interests – at heart.

While this is going on, we could easily create dedicated bus lanes, put in more buses, improve last-mile connectivity and expand the ferry system by constructing more ferries. The bonus is that all this investment in sustainable mobility infrastructure will create lots of meaningful new jobs – while improving the quality of life in Penang.

Sign Aliran's 'Save our Democracy" petition
Sign Aliran's petition calling for a review of the decision to grant Riza Aziz a DNAA
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dr. SNaidu
Dr. SNaidu
16 Jun 2020 2.22pm

The quality of everyday life of the ordinary man and family has always to be given good attention. They are the people who keep life of a society functioning well.The powers that be NEED to focus religiously on ‘balanced and meaningful’ development. Economic devt is NOT n shd never BE just about money n profit today, especially with the COVID n George Flyd issues.The fishermen n their families,environnment, sea life, are all important, as the future need n benefits of infrastructure devt..We must weed CORRUPT ‘leaders’ n practices. There shd be a stronger anti-corruption OMBUDSMAN body with good people fr ALL communities, as in some nations, as an effective checK n balance, for the RAKYAT, going forward in God, for OUR COMMON posterity.

Dominic Damian
15 Jun 2020 2.52am

The foul or profane language these days is not the four letter word. The spine chilling blood freezing words are advancement, progress and benefits. Who is going to advance? Who is going to progress? Who is going to benefit? The plan is not transparent or opaque with all the facts and figures, laid out in a an impartial manner. The approach so far as I see it is intimidation, cyber troopers, and glossy plastic promotion without substantive facts and no audit or accountability. A real approach would have an acceptance of a respectful contest of ideas and the best way forward. The fishermen who are affected must be well informed and their voices accorded sensitive dignity of life. Otherwise there is no honour in this project.

Ali Said
Ali Said
13 Jun 2020 11.33am

Penangites have been waiting for very long for infrastructure projects like these. Please I beg you 🙏, let the state government proceed with PTMP. I do understand your concerns, but I hope that you would address some other issues that are not stopping Penang from developing. I’m not speaking for myself because all the people around me are also fully supporting the PTMP. Thanks ❤️

Anti-Propaganda
Anti-Propaganda
13 Jun 2020 7.56am

I am guessing some of the comments here must be the work of pro-PTMP cybertroopers. We have quite a few of those in Penang. Some of them even use pseudonyms to make it appear as if they are from other ethnic groups. The idea is to make it look like PTMP enjoys support from all ethnic groups.

Their overall aim is to prop up the PTMP and discredit critics and NGOs.

So bear that in mind when reading the other comments here.

Mohammed Abu
Mohammed Abu
12 Jun 2020 7.21pm

Imagine where would big cities like New York, London or Singapore be if they did not have any extensive public transport network or rail system? These NGOs are just trying to hold back the development of Penang and preventing the people of Penang from living better life. Yes it may affect the environment and yes it may affect the livelihood of some people. But considering that it will benefit most of the people in Penang, we should sometimes be considerate and think for the bigger picture. These NGOs are pure selfish and their voice does not represent the people of Penang.

Anonymous
Anonymous
12 Jun 2020 3.34pm

PSR and PTMP are for the future of Penang. Do you only start building houses when you realized there are many homeless out there. Imagine 10 years later, with the increase of population, do you think our existing infrastructure can support? Do you think that there will be enough jobs for the people. Nope, that’s when Penangite will again flocking out of the city to earn themselves a better life and yet Penang is still there without any improvements. There’s so much a road can do. All thanks to the so called NGOs who have big mouth but small mind. Thanks for holding back Penang and you guys have wasted a lot of OUR TIME!!

Ban Cheng Tan
Ban Cheng Tan
12 Jun 2020 12.07pm

The trouble with our local politicians is that they can only see their fixated vision without taking due consideration to alternative voices, voices that may prove wise over time.

Maybe, there breathe rarefied air. I believe all that has happened so far is for the good of all Penangites.