Home TA Online Trust, betrayal and bombs: The US–Iran nuclear talks that ended in war

Trust, betrayal and bombs: The US–Iran nuclear talks that ended in war

Iran was ready to give up its uranium stockpiles. Hours later, Khamenei was dead

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

Ch’ng Chin Yeow

The US and Israel’s attack on Iran came amid US nuclear negotiations with Iran brokered by Oman.

On the day of the attack, Oman’s Foreign Minister told CBS News that a major breakthrough had been reached, with Iran agreeing never to stockpile enriched uranium – precisely what the US and Israel had demanded.

Within hours of that announcement, the bombing began, killing Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and around 40 other senior Iranian leaders at the building housing the Ayatollah’s office.

It was in his first term that US President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew from Iran’s nuclear deal – the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action signed under President Barack Obama – reimposing sanctions on Iran. The JCPOA had placed significant restrictions on Iran’s nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief.

So close to a deal…

It is deeply unconscionable that the US and Israel chose to kill Khamenei and Iran’s top leaders when the negotiations were still underway and nearing the finishing line – with Iran willing to concede exactly what had been demanded of it.

The attacks came as Iranian leaders were meeting at the Ayatollah’s office rather than sheltering in bunkers – lured, it would seem, into a false sense of security that war had been averted.

A pretext for war?

Negotiating with the US, it turns out, cannot be taken in good faith. In this case, it appears that the US was merely using the negotiations as cover to buy time to move its military assets to the region in preparation for an attack on Iran.

READ MORE:  The desolation of the word 'ceasefire'

With or without a nuclear agreement, the US and Israel had apparently already decided to attack Iran.

New colonialism, old playbook

The message the US is sending to the Global South is that it is not to be trusted.

To Washington, peace can only be achieved through military and economic power – through missiles, tariffs and sanctions – not by building relationships and trust.

For the US, peace means the world prostrating itself and submitting to its demands. It is the colonialism of old, camouflaged and rebranded.

Ch’ng Chin Yeow, based in Penang, is interested in many areas, including history, mineralogy and human behaviour.

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support our work by making a donation. Tap to download the QR code below and scan this QR code from Gallery by using TnG e-wallet or most banking apps:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

Most Read

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x