The dark secret of the recurring water pollution crisis

1
504 views

Jailing and imposing fines on offending business operators is not the ultimate solution; the whole waste management approach must be revamped, JD Lovrenciear writes.

The recent water supply disruption affecting over a thousand areas in the Klang Valley and Selangor brought immense hardships to over a million people, adding more hardship to those already hit by the coronavirus pandemic. 

There are no gainers when clean and safe water supply is severely disrupted. From households to industrial consumers and healthcare facilities, everyone in the affected areas pays an unaccounted price for this disaster.

We have not even accounted for other life forms in nature affected by the dumping of toxic liquid waste, which forced our water treatment plants to shut down.

Who knows what other environmental pollution problems across the country have escaped our attention. 

To say that we need to pass more bills in Parliament to address these recurring cases of water pollution is merely pulling wool over our eyes, even if it sounds politically correct.

In Malaysia, the Department of Environment (DoE) has introduced over 20 laws and subsidiary legislation to protect the environment. Various incentives are also in place to encourage industries to avert what we popularly label as ‘accidental pollution’ of our environment.

So our laws are up to date in handling in the contemporary nature of waste. 

Section (s) 2 of the Environmental Quality Act 1974 and Regulations state: “Waste includes any matter prescribed to be scheduled wastes, or any matter whether in a solid, semi-solid or liquid form, or in the form of gas or vapour which is emitted, discharged or deposited in the environment in such volume, composition or manner as to cause pollution.”

READ MORE:  Saving Penang's Sungai Ara

Our national administrative machinery is also equipped with an inherited framework, no different from that of the UK. The DoE is responsible for regulating industrial waste. The department of Local Government and the Ministry of Housing and Local Government as well as local authorities are responsible for managing solid waste and household waste.

But despite all the laws and administrative frameworks in place, pollution continually plagues us. We look for victims to blame when the latest crisis strikes. Meanwhile, the truth remains buried for a lack of political will.  

In Malaysia, despite the rapid expansion of industrialisation, we have not tackled waste management the same way the developed world has. We have widely practised for quite a long time what they call “end-of-pipe” treatment or regulation. This is a traditional waste management approach: burn, bury or sink the waste – a typical third world approach. 

The national will to migrate to cleaner technologies falls short of our zeal to achieve “first world” status. After 63 years of independent rule in the peninsula, we remain stuck with the practice of end-of-pipe pollution treatment. Profit remains the sole motivator.

After the latest water disruption – arising from the ‘unlawful’ dumping of industrial toxic waste – politicians and lawmakers need to go beyond their clamour for more stringent laws and tighter water security laws while hoping to gain popular votes.

The truth is we need to “review, establish and enforce guidelines such as prevention, recycling and reuse, optimization and final disposal, regulation and transport and lastly remedial action” (John D Leeson, 1995) if we are serious about protecting the environment and the people. 

READ MORE:  Prioritise workers' rights and safety at workplaces when dealing with illegal factories

Those governing and wanting to govern the nation – and intent on pursuing the ‘political popularity agenda’ of clamouring for “developed nation” status by 2030 – should perhaps be held responsible for our lack of progress in environmental care.

Our leaders must realise that most end-of-pipe treatment or disposal options that are being practised merely transfer the pollution problems elsewhere.

The increased cost of waste treatment, handling and disposal, on-site waste control and monitoring – all of which demand significant financial commitments by private firms – does not incentivise business operators and political parties that are more concerned about profiteering or survival. 

Even the on-site storage space required by law for waste storage is costly as business operators from small and medium industries to bigger corporations battle with cost and profit margins.

In short, while the desperation to propel a developing nation pinned its hopes on industrialisation, the end-of-pipe control practice demanded by our laws has proven costly.

Hence we are engulfed with the symbiotic problems of the inefficiency and ineffectiveness of the end-of-pipe waste and industrial waste management approaches.

Jailing and imposing fines on offending business operators is not the ultimate solution. Indeed, shutting down polluters’ premises is just a band-aid fix.

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gursharan Singh
Gursharan Singh
15 Sep 2020 10.22am

Is it not commonly perceived that Malaysia may not be short of laws but what may be

MISSING MAY BE EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT and
PROMPT DETERRENT PENALTIES ON INDENTIFIED OFFENDERS for which the

# REASONS MAY BE PERCEPTION OF SUSPECTED FRAUD & CORRUPTION INVOLVING SOME IN POSITIONS OF ENFORCEMENT or LEADERSHIP or POWER TO INFLUENCE ANY ACTION TO BE TAKEN with another

# REASON COULD BE LEGAL PROCEDURES WHICH MAY OPPORTUNITIES FOR CASES TO BE POSTPONED [and Legal Professionals may be weell versed in them] or

# PRESCRIBED PENALTIES TOO LOW TO BE DETERRENT AND NON-IMPOSITION OF PRESCRIBED MAXIMUM PENALTIES which encourages the ignoring of laws as the

# PROFITS ARE MUCH HIGHER COMPARED TO THE ADDITIONAL PENALTIES COSTS IF CAUGHT?