The quest for ethnic harmony and accountability

2

The way forward is for Malaysians to work as common citizens, with ethno-religious identities playing a minimum role in national consciousness, writes Ronald Benjamin.

Elusive national unity?
Elusive national unity?

The coming general election on 5 May 2013 is going to be a defining moment for Malaysians who desire change in the way country is governed.

There were several arguments on the both sides of the political divide. The argument that caught my attention is the write up to The Malaysian Insider titled ‘Voting for ethnic harmony’ by Dr Chandra Muzaffar. He states in a nutshell that Pas and the DAP are not fit to govern because of its ideological orientations, which will widen even further the chasm that divides Malaysian communities. Therefore, if a victory for the opposition will result in a divided Malaysia, how then can Umno, the MCA and the MIC (who jealously guide their ethnic political identity by closing the doors to other ethnic groups) not widen the chasm among Malaysian communities especially among the younger
generation?

Dr Chandra states in his article that Barisan National has proven its credentials in defusing ethnic tensions over the years, but that does not portray the source of ethnic tensions and how it has been dealt with over the years.
The claim that Barisan National has defused ethnic tensions arising from certain events such as the 2010 sporadic attacks on churches, mosques and a Gurdawara ignores the fact that it was the political practices of the ruling party that led to such attacks. Is it not true that the current entrenched elitist-based ethno-political establishment, when it finds itself challenged for accountability, resorts to ethno-centric fears that trigger extreme behaviors? Is it not that too much focus on the identity of ethno-religious groups has led to a similar response by other ethno-religious groups?

READ MORE:  Can a holy man lie? Apparently Hadi can!

How can ethnic harmony be built under such a political framework? For example, the 1990 general election was one of the most ethno-centric general elections held. The scenario of a Christian state was created, and Umno invited Pas to join in its struggle to oppose the so-called threat to Muslim rule, which culminated in the tengkolok salib issue. This led to a change in voting behaviour in the peninsula at the time.

In 1987, the squabble between Umno and the MCA over the Chinese school headmasters controversy came to a head. Ethnic tension reared its ugly head when Umno Youth, headed by current Prime Minister Najib Razak, held a demonstration in protest against its ally.

Dr Mahathir used this event as an opportunity, to detain opposition figures as well as Dr Chandra Muzzafar and a number of social activists who had no connection to the issue. The ISA was used in name of ethnic harmony and national security, when the real motive of the Mahathir regime was to muzzle growing dissent among vocal groups to his autocratic rule.

It is surprising that Chandra has forgotten these events making his article lack objectivity in a real sense. He has failed to acknowledge that race-based emotions have been used as a convenient buffer to protect the powerful from accountability on issues such as abuse of power, corruption and the growing economic gap between the rich and the poor.

Therefore, it vital for discerning Malaysians to understand history and culture provided by the constitution that would help forge ethnic harmony – but not in a way that supports an ethnic framework that reinforces ethnic identity using history and culture and identity as convenient tools to divert the nation from real issues such abuse of power, corruption and the glaring gap between the rich and the poor.

READ MORE:  Can a holy man lie? Apparently Hadi can!

The way forward is for Malaysians to work as common citizens, with ethno-religious identities playing a minimum role in national consciousness. This means rejecting exclusive race- and religious-basd base political parties, which would ultimately encourage them to open up their political parties to other ethnic groups. Voting for ethnic harmony starts here.

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KTWong87
KTWong87
2 May 2013 10.14am

“It is surprising that Chandra has forgotten these events making his article lack objectivity in a real sense”?

Not surprisng to me. That “forgetfulness” and lack of objectivitiy has made legions of folks who once respected him turn away in disgust.

Dulu lain, kini… memang lain dah.

najib manaukau
1 May 2013 1.47pm

How many of the voters are (minorities) and how many of them are imported voters out of all the registered voters ? According to the figures released there are more than 11 millions (minorities) in Malaysia and of these how many of them are voters ? If not, why are they left out ? Do you need the brain of Einstein to know the real reason behind this omission ?