Election fraud in South America

3

Even if one cannot do a lot against election fraud, there are still a lot of ways to oblige the government to adopt clear and impartial electoral rules, writes Constant C.

Keiko Fujimori on the campaign trail - Photograph: Arthur Ide
Keiko Fujimori on the campaign trail – Photograph: Arthur Ide

On different occasions, I had the opportunity to work in South America. The first time was in Peru, in 2011. The second was in Mexico, in mid-2012. On both these occasions, I arrived when presidential elections were going to be held. And I realised then how long the path towards a ‘clean democracy’ was.

In Peru, many scandals emerged before and after the election took place. They had to elect their president, and the two political favourites were Humala Ollanta, a former army officer responsible for the ‘andahuaylaso’ ( i.e. the “coup d’état of Andahuaylas”, an Andes town), which was aborted in 2000, and Keiko Fujimori, the daughter of the former dictator of the country, Alberto Fujimori. Her father took power democratically in 1990 and turned his country into a dictatorship, which ended in 2000.

During the campaign, corruption was frequent and spread to all levels of Peruvian society – from the media to the consumer, from the political elite to the working class. All means were used to gain votes such as giving kitchen utensils to poorer communities with the logo of the party they must vote for.

As in every election, the poor are the most affected by electoral fraud. Since they have an interest in this corruption they will not refuse or protest, as the political parties give them what they cannot afford to buy for their day-to-day life.

READ MORE:  How much does an election cost?

In Mexico, the situation was more or less similar. Corruption and bribery…but I have also seen something more.

I lived in a very remote place, in the south of the country, Chiapas, the cradle of the Zapatistas, an insurrectionist movement.

On the day of the election, walking around the city, I was surprised by the way they organised it. Election can be defined as a complex system of rules and operational measures. But I could not see it anywhere. It seemed as if the election was held without any rules, each bureau was different from the other. The vote took place in the street where some tables, voting booths and ballot boxes were set up. Everybody knew that there would be fraud, as in previous elections. In these conditions, democracy would have been undermined, as a free and fair vote is central to its existence.

But Mexicans reacted to the fraud – the first time the result was contested. This happened in 2006, when Andrés Manuel Lopez Obrador from the opposition party realised his election had been stolen by Felipe Calderon, from the governing Party, and called for a protest that paralysed Mexico D.F.

More recently, the ongoing movement named “Yo soy 132” (“I am 132”) showed how the people reacted. “I am 132”, the expression used in solidarity with the protest initiator, is a spontaneous social movement inspired by Occupy Wall Street, The Arab Spring and Madrid’s 15-M movement that calls for the democratisation of political life and free and fair elections.

Democracy is supposed to give voice to the people’s aspirations, through elections or through public expression. To live this kind of experience taught me that even if one cannot do a lot against election fraud, there are still a lot of ways to oblige the government to adopt clear and impartial electoral rules. Bersih appears to me as one of them.

READ MORE:  Learn from Trump and his failed racist politics

Constant C is an intrepid traveller currently based in Penang.

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
raj
raj
21 Feb 2013 6.00pm

Clearly the governmet of the ruling party is bankrucpt of ideas. They making the citizen stupid and think the citizen are stupid. But the election outcome will prove the ruling party they are grossly wrong.

najib manaukau
21 Feb 2013 1.22pm

May be ii is time Malaysia time for the opposition to bring in people from Peru and Mexico as observers for our coming GE, after all it takes a thief to catch a thief !

jasminetea2
21 Feb 2013 10.45am

A parallel can be drawn between the South American experience of election fraud and the Malaysian election experience. Corruption has a commonality in all countries, as political parties seek to ‘buy’ votes. In Malaysia it is now the BR1M distribution and Bajet 2013, advertised to lure votes. There is a sudden interest in the people by the BN after 55 years, that this hard sell campaign is getting a bit too repetitive and boring. But, what can be expected of a ruling party that is bankrupt of ideas and only views the Rakyat like the “kitchen god” whose mouth must be “sweetened” with ‘kuih bakul’ so a good report will be made to the Heavenly authorities? Hopefully, the Rakyat are not as gullible as that.