Freedom of expression: Growing discontent and the culture of fear

0
314

Unless we are vigilant and make our voices heard, we might be heading towards a deadly precipice that will bring us misery, says Abd Rashid Hanafi.

The purpose of freedom of expression is to allow everyone to express his or her views without the threat of persecution or the fear of losing their lives over it.

The expression comes in many forms: speeches, publications, visual arts, performing arts and assemblies.

Where freedom of expression is denied, evil takes root and authoritarianism rules.

The right to freedom of expression is an elementary necessity of citizens in any democratic society. And there can be no society unless its members are free to express their opinions and views without fear of reprisal.

It is only through free expression that we benefit from the opinions, ideas and experiences of others. Without free expression, society will stagnate.

Freedom of expression is a means of self-protection. When we are free to express our opinions we can protect ourselves against the tyranny and injustice of others or of any individual person.

People should be free to participate in legitimate public discourse on matters and issues of concern that are vital to the interests of citizens and the nation without any interference by the government (state).

Such freedom implies that every citizen should be free to criticise any policy and action pursued by the government that they deem to be unconstitutional and detrimental to their rights and as well as to the nation.

Freedom of speech never does harm to anyone. In fact, the space enables concerned citizens to express their concerns, counter falsehoods and expose the supression and the misdeeds of corrupt leaders.

READ MORE:  Facilitate legitimate discourse; uphold, protect freedom of expression

Unfortunately, our leaders have lost their perspective and have developed a tendency to automatically equate dissension with disloyalty to the nation. They view any criticism of the government as sedition and subversion and therefore unwarranted.

The government is not a power system. It should be a fellowship of people aiming at the enrichment of common life. It is given powers because it is entrusted to carry out duties, and one primary duty is to create conditions of happiness and of spiritual upliftment for the people.

Coercive power, no doubt, is at the disposal of the State, but it is not the essence of the State. It is only the clumsy and the stupid who seek to attain their ends by force. When force becomes the basis of the State, its indiscriminate use crushes the personality of the individual and destroys the social order.

Many concerned citizens hold no special brief for any particular ideology, party or group. They criticise or comment with sincerity in their heart apart from those who personally seek to disparage the government for whatever ulterior motive or reason.

The freedom to think as you will and to speak as you think are indispensible; these are the charateristics of parliamentary democracy. The right to freedom of expression is, of course, not absolute – it entails responsibilities.

In the interest of social order and out of respect for the rights of others, restraints are required on freedom of expression. We see the State best not in what it is, but in what it does. It must give to its citizens those conditions which contribute to the common interest and the common welfare.

READ MORE:  Free speech, the AG and parliamentary oversight

If in order to protect and promote their welfare, the State is compelled to use force then it must be on the basis of upholding the common good and preserving moral and social values.

The exercise of power must not be abitrary. It must be consistant with justice – to protect the weak instead of the strong. It must be to penalise utterances which tend to corrupt public morals, stir racial unrest, defame individuals, incite people to hate others and all other unwarranted activities that undermine the foundation of our constitution.

The sphere of the State is vast, but it is not omnicompetent. History tells us that when the State crosses its legitimate bounds, disregards the constitution, and stifles individual freedom, it creates confusion and discontent. It is then and sure to fail; such actions eventually will lead to its downfall. This has happened in the past and it may happen again, today, if it attempts what it ought not to attempt.

We have to stop, to see and, to question where we are heading to. Unless we are vigilant and make our voices heard, we might be heading towards a deadly precipice that will bring us misery.

Sign Aliran's 'Save our Democracy" petition
Sign Aliran's petition calling for a review of the decision to grant Riza Aziz a DNAA
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments