Charles Santiago
I lodged a police report in 2022 alleging abuse of power by former attorney general Apandi Ali over his handling of 1MDB, backed by a High Court judgment that explicitly questioned the truthfulness of Apandi’s claims.
Justice Azimah Omar recorded that the so-called Saudi ‘donor’ was never met, never spoken to, never verified – despite Apandi publicly insisting otherwise in 2016.
And now, Najib Razak himself performs a political somersault worthy of the Olympics and admits the RM42m did not come from the Saudi government.
This is a confession by timeline. The story collapses. The lie is exposed. The architecture of deception becomes visible.
- Sign up for Aliran's free daily email updates or weekly newsletters or both
- Make a one-off donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara (ALIRAN), Maybank a/c 507246118995 or CIMB a/c 8004240948
- Make a pledge or schedule an auto donation to Aliran every month or every quarter
- Become an Aliran member
And yet, the investigation into Apandi? Neatly stamped ‘no further action’ (NFA). Case closed. File shelved. Memory erased. Not because the evidence disappeared but because accountability did.
This is procedural choreography. Everyone knows the steps: delay, deflect, classify, silence.
To those of you questioning whether the system failed, here’s my response: it performed exactly as designed. The lie was not corrected; it was protected.
Meanwhile, in another Malaysia – the real one – a father of four was fined RM1,500 for stealing milk, shampoo and detergent worth RM131.50.
In early January this year, a 29-year-old father of two was jailed for one month for stealing groceries worth RM113.70.
My friends, that’s not law enforcement but moral comedy. Steal millions, destabilise institutions, mislead the nation: NFA. Steal milk for your children: criminal.
Apparently, the real crime in this country is poverty, not power. Hunger is prosecuted faster than corruption. Desperation gets handcuffs; deception gets immunity.
The contrast is grotesque. One group weaponises state institutions and walks free. Another steals survival items and gets punished publicly and permanently.
The law here does not protect society; it protects hierarchy. It does not target harm; it targets the powerless. It does not pursue truth; it manages perception.
The message is simple: theft of groceries is dangerous but theft of democracy is administratively inconvenient.
Cover-ups require aligned silences.
When police classify politically explosive cases as NFA despite judicial findings, parliamentary questions and public contradictions, that’s protection. That’s containment. That’s the system insulating itself from its own crimes.
This is not about Apandi alone but about how institutions close ranks when truth threatens legitimacy.
So yes, the investigations into Apandi must be reopened – not as a symbolic gesture, but as a legal necessity.
If the law can chase a man for stealing milk but cannot touch a former attorney general accused of misleading the nation over the largest financial scandal in Malaysian history, then we are no longer talking about rule of law. We are talking about selective morality with a badge.
And that, frankly, is the darkest joke of all.
Charles Santiago is the former MP of Klang.
AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
- Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
- Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
- Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
- Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
- Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Well said! Like the malay proverb; ‘Dua Darjat.’