Riza’s discharge: Could the judge have ordered a trial?

4
1172
Riza Aziz - Photo: Alex Berliner/ABImages/Wikipedia

Clearly, there were grounds for the charges, and there was sufficient evidence accumulated, P Ramakrishnan writes.

The layman in me is terribly troubled and greatly upset at the way the money-laundering cases – five in all – have turned out.

I am thoroughly confused! I just can’t get over the fact that a criminal could go free keeping part of the loot! To add salt to the wound, his lawyer even allegedly proclaimed that Riza was innocent.

For heaven’s sake, this is a criminal case. A crime is a crime.

But we are told by the lead prosecutor, Gopal Sri Ram, that if Riza fulfils the terms of the plea bargain, “then appropriate steps will be taken to ensure that the accused obtains a full acquittal.”

What is a full acquittal?

It means a defendant is not guilty of a crime as charged. Once the acquittal is reached, the defendant may not be prosecuted again for the same criminal act or transaction.

“Not guilty” and “acquittal” are synonymous.

In other words, it means that Rizal did not commit any crime and therefore he is not guilty.

Then why was he charged in the first place? Does it mean he was wrongly charged? But then, he was charged on five counts. How can the Attorney General’s Chambers charge a person without thoroughly investigating the case? Has the attorney general erred in charging him?

Following in the footsteps of Riza’s settlement, what if Jho Low now comes forward and volunteers to surrender part of his loot, will he be acquitted? We don’t have to waste time trying to trace him or seek Interpol’s assistance to arrest him. Can he go free just like Riza? That might tempt him to come out of hiding!

READ MORE:  Musa Aman - Only DNAA should have been granted

Wait a minute, there is one snag in Jho Low’e case. His father wasn’t the prime minister of Malaysia!

Or take another criminal case. Supposing a criminal who has abducted a girl comes forward and seeks a plea bargain to set the girl free, can he go free? Will he be similarly acquitted? Shouldn’t the law apply to all fairly and squarely?

The lay person’s understanding is this: before the case goes to court, the attorney general is absolutely in charge. He is the one who decides whether there is a case to be charged in court. If he is fully satisfied and convinced there is a case to be answered, he refers the case to court for a trial.

But once the case is with the court, the lay person’s understanding is that the court is in control. The court can decide whether there are sufficient grounds for a case to be withdrawn. If the case is serious enough to go for trial, the judge can refuse the withdrawal or dropping of the case and order the case to go for trial.

Likewise, couldn’t the judge in Riza’s case have ordered Riza to stand trial? Clearly, there were grounds for the charges, and there was sufficient evidence accumulated by the Attorney General’s Chambers for the charges.

Those of us who are dissatisfied with the way Riza was allowed to go free, those of us who are outraged by what has happened – we must stand up and make known our utter disappointment and frustration.

Let’s remember, “There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.”

Sign Aliran's 'Save our Democracy" petition
Sign Aliran's petition calling for a review of the decision to grant Riza Aziz a DNAA
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dr.Suranthiran Naidu
Dr.Suranthiran Naidu
29 May 2020 4.28pm

The youth are looking on. They are the future captains of OUR nation. We need to make sure we endow them with the RIGHT NATIONHOOD-RUKUN NEGARA VALUES. Money must be EARNED, as we were taught by the MSN elders of all communities. The ‘falsities’ NEEd to be arrested and eradicated once and for all, with ‘good education’. There are good examples of nations who are on this PATH, who can be emulated.The PM, royalty, educators, have to do their GOD-given jobs and FULFILL their roles with all urgency now.

ambigapathi samarasan
ambigapathi samarasan
28 May 2020 11.54pm

I am not surprised at all when PN came to power, they came through the backdoor, now we see this happening, next PN decides who is to charged and who can be free not the Attorney General.we also saw the one hour parliament for the first time in the world. Then we are going to see MPs asking for money for their GLC as they like, even when there is not much left in the pot. For that bring back GST let them grab whatever they can, before the next GE. We the people are made to look stupid

Tony
Tony
29 May 2020 9.11pm

Front door or back door.now no door.
We are sinking.

Steven
Steven
27 May 2020 11.17am

To me Sri Gopal Ram’s role seems pivotal.

If, as Idrus claims it was TT who okayed the deal without he (Idrus) questioning and using his own logic to exercise the authority of his position, then we have a spineless new AG.

It would be interesting to know what Sri Gopal told Idrus what had transpired between he (Sri Gopal) and TT.

Did Idrus just follow what Sri Gopal told him?

Something seems fishy.