One-day Parliament sitting: Muhyiddin running scared – no majority support?

3
4,187 views
Photograph: Wikimedia Commons

It will not be a meaningful session as it denies the elected representatives their right to play a responsible role in upholding the people’s interest and the welfare of the nation, P Ramakrishnan writes.

Unlike any other parliament sitting around the world, the Malaysian Parliament will sit for only one day! 

Unlike the traditional parliamentary procedure, this Parliament on May 18 will not debate the King’s speech. Unlike the usual agenda which includes an oral question session, written questions, motions, special chambers sittings, etc, this sitting will have none of this.

According to a letter issued by Dewan Rakyat secretary Riduan Rahmat to all MPs, this session is held only to discuss government bills and matters. But it isn’t an emergency session. It is a normal sitting under the Federal Constitution.

This rather unique sitting has shocked the nation and mocked our parliamentary system. We must be the laughing stock of the world which practises parliamentary democracy as we know it!

But does the backdoor government care? It does not! 

In a parliamentary system, a debate follows the king’s speech. That is the tradition. After all, it contains the plans and programmes of the government which deserve to be fully debated. 

In doing away with this practice, the government now cannot be questioned, taken to task or held accountable. There is no opportunity for MPs to enhance certain proposed programmes or include their input in the national interest.

This is absurd! This is nonsensical! This defies the sanctity of parliamentary procedure! It makes meaningless the purpose of parliamentary sittings. It makes a mockery of the entire process!

READ MORE:  Mahathir or Anwar? This is not a game of musical chairs

Teresa Kok, the Seputeh MP, critically and rightly commented, “The Perikatan Nasional government has no legitimate basis to limit this sitting of Parliament to only one day as, despite the Covid-19 pandemic lockdown, we have seen lately that many democracies, such as the UK and the US, have convened normal parliamentary sessions.”

Anwar Ibrahim observed that a Parliament sitting must have a debate, even if it is brief, and questioned the rationale for convening the Dewan Rakyat for a day next month.

Anwar even proposed a separate sitting of Parliament for a single day just to address the Covid-19 pandemic that poses a grave danger to the country. But even this was rejected without any reason.

It looks as if Muhyiddin does not want the rest of the country to be involved in any role or to shoulder any responsibility in a joint effort to overcome this danger. He is satisfied in limiting this task to only his cabinet, which includes the clueless health minister!

Common sense would debunk any notion that Muhyiddin’s cabinet is the epitome of wisdom! His ministers are fumbling and endangering the country in this crucial period. Various suggestions and a critical outlook may be necessary to overcome not only the menace of the virus but the terrible economic situation we are in.

A mind-boggling sum – RM260bn to be exact – has been mentioned in the stimulus package, which must be scrutinised, debated and safeguarded so that there will be no leakages, siphoning off of any money or other financial abuses to ensure that the money goes to the intended people and for that purpose only.

READ MORE:  Parliament support vs scrutiny

Now this is not possible. MPs are not able to discharge their duties following this severe undemocratic curbing of their functions. They are unable to fulfil their responsibilities to the voters under this restriction as they are prevented from raising the views of the people and voicing their legitimate grievances.

Truly, what can be achieved in a one-day sitting? It will not be a meaningful session as it denies the elected representatives their right to play a responsible role in upholding the people’s interest and the welfare of the nation. It is a farce, a misnomer and a travesty of a parliamentary sitting.

If it is not prudent to have a 15-day session from 18 May as earlier scheduled, because of the Covid-19 threat, can’t we have the session for a week so that all MPs can jointly debate and discuss the various ways to fight the virus and tackle the worrying economy of the country that is on a downward spiral?

The question is, why is Muhyiddin afraid of a debate? Is he consumed by fear that if a motion of no confidence were to be moved, he might not survive? Parliament should not become subordinate to his desire to remain as PM at whatever cost.

There is perhaps reason to believe that Muhyiddin did not have the majority when he was sworn in as PM.

Mahathir is emphatic on this point, claiming that he had 114 MPs supporting him when he sought to be reappointed as PM just before Muhyiddin was sworn in as the eighth PM.

In his interview with Bloomberg on 16 March, Mahathir said Muhyiddin did not have the majority at the material time. “We are not very sure why he was chosen. He did not have a majority.” According to Mahathir, when MPs were subsequently asked to state their preference, Anwar had 92 MPs supporting him and 66 were for Mahathir.

READ MORE:  Mahathir: I'm concerned Najib might somehow return as PM

If this is accurate information, it would mean 158 MPs were against Muhyiddin. Thus, he would have had the support of 64 MPs only.

Mathematics doesn’t lie. Going by these figures, Muhyiddin’s goose would have been cooked if there was a vote of no confidence!

Is this why Muhyiddin has resorted to this unparliamentary way of doing things? In this way, no such motion of confidence can be moved, and that would ensure that he does not lose his backdoor government in order to continue in power. This is what he is craving for. The backdoor government must be protected to preserve his position and power.

Fellow Malaysians, this saying is a good reminder of the present reality: “It is not surprising that more and more people are coming to the conclusion that the ballot box is no longer an instrument that will secure political solutions… They can see that the parliamentary democracy we boast of is becoming a sham.”

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Xax
Xax
4 May 2020 5.59pm

Malaysia has been laughing joke all this while no matter what. No proper timelines for reforms anyway. Judiciary is tainted now. Just take care of loved ones in this crisis

Gursharan Singh
Gursharan Singh
2 May 2020 10.46am

What is the benefit to the nation or rakyat by just having a one day session”
What may be the legal/other implications if this one day sitting is not held longer?

IS THIS ONE DAY SITTING IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE ELECTED REPS AND IF YES
THEN WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS TO THEM AND WHAT IS THE COST TO THE TAXPAYERS?

Who will provide some explanation and answers to above questions?

RAKYAT WAITS AS IT IS LOST AND TOO BUSY WORRYING FOR THEIR FUTURE WHICH IS ALSO FACING ECONOMIC AND OTHERS HARDSHIPS AND WHEN THE COVID 19 RESTRICTIONS WILL END AND LIFE RETURNS TO NORMAL?

BE SAFE – BLESS ALL

Khoo Soo Hay
Khoo Soo Hay
27 Apr 2020 11.20am

As P.H. MPs are no longer in the Government, and as Parliament more or less does not exist, all salaries and allowances for MPs of all colours should be withdrawn, as they are not able to do what they are supposed to do in Parliament, debate and make decisions for the governing of this country. Why continue to have so-called MPs when Parliament does not meet in the traditional and accepted way as it should. We are under a dictatorship no doubt under the guise of a so-called back door government. Will Muhyuddin get a majority support of MPs in Parliament on the 18th of May ?