Malaysians turn to the Agong for the truth; people look up to the palace for the answer!

To avoid debate on this issue, Putrajaya thought it could circumvent this problem of debate and defeat in Parliament by illegally annulling the emergency

1,334 views
The general election losers are now ruling the country

(Note: The Agong and the palace have clarified the issues raised in this article – the lie has been nailed!)

I am no lawyer and therefore I am not confused. Unlike some lawyers, I have no problem in understanding what is meant.

The emergency promulgated by the Agong, if not revoked by him, cannot be annulled by the cabinet. The cabinet has no such power and neither has it been endowed with the authority to revoke it. Only Parliament has that authority to revoke the emergency when the emergency ordinances are put before it to debate and decide its fate.

The lawyers on the government side don’t see it that way. The Speaker of Parliament is a stumbling block preventing the truth from being exposed, repeating ad nauseam, “Unless revoked earlier” without stating by whom.

On 26 July, when the special sitting of Parliament took place, the de facto law minister, Takiyuddin Hassan, stunned the House with the disclosure that the emergency ordinances were annulled on 21 July. He declared that the emergency was no longer in force as from 21 July.

I am not a lawyer, but I know that this lawyer does not understand the law. He is not telling the truth because the cabinet cannot annul the emergency. He was misleading the House because there was no documentary evidence to back up his claim. There was neither a gazette notification nor a palace announcement to support his claim. He could not produce a signed document by the Agong revoking the emergency.

When the Opposition demanded to know if the Agong had revoked the emergency, the question went unanswered. The Speaker was no help either – he ruled that all questions pertaining to the legality of the so-called annulment would be answered on 2 August, the following Monday, a week later. What is the rationale for his ruling? He doesn’t care to explain. It is his prerogative to be ridiculous!

READ MORE:  Penipuan menggemparkan yang barangkali akan menentukan takdir pemerintahan Mahiaddin

Obviously, the Speaker was buying time for the Perikatan Nasional to sort out this blunder by cooking up another tale!

It is very obvious to all and sundry that there was no signed document to support that the emergency and the ordinances were indeed revoked by the Agong. If there was, then it would have been produced posthaste. This would have saved unnecessary time spent arguing on the legality of the cabinet action. The MPs were truly riled because what was claimed to have been done had no legal basis.

In a desperate attempt to avoid debate on this issue, Putrajaya thought it could circumvent this problem of debate and defeat in Parliament by illegally annulling the emergency. They must have been emboldened that the Speaker would save their skin by ruling in their favour. But it will take more than a pliable Speaker to rescue the Perikatan Nasional.

As if it wasn’t enough to go through a day of confusion and incredulity, on the second day of Parliament, another cabinet minister, Federal Territories Minister Annuar Musa dropped a bombshell by saying that the revocation of the emergency was “in the process” – meaning that the annulment had not taken place.

Both Takiyuddin and Annuar Musa are members of the same cabinet. They both must have attended the same cabinet meeting on 21 July when the so-called decision was taken, and yet, we have two contrasting versions of the decision taken: Anuar contradicted what Takiyuddin had announced a day earlier in Parliament.

If one is telling the truth, there could only be one version of the decision – not two. One of them – or both – must be lying!

READ MORE:  Parlimen perlu bersidang segera, bukan September mahupun Oktober (Malay/English)

The vast majority of loyal, patriotic Malaysians believe the Agong had not consented to the revocation of the emergency. They believe that only the Agong can come out with the truth. They hope the Agong will clarify the truth and ensure that Malaysia is on the path of democracy observing the rule of law.

Malaysians expect the palace to throw light and clear the conflicting versions that have been dished out by the PN government.

We are reminded of this quotation: “If you are feeling that the government is misleading you, you are not alone.” ― Steven Magee

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gram Massla
Gram Massla
29 Jul 2021 8.24pm

In times of extreme stress a country may revert to anarchy from the rule of law. To prevent this the holders of hard power, such as the Army Chief and the Chief of Police should come together and declare, in no uncertain term, that the Constitution of Malaysia will be adhered to in the strictest sense of the terms therein. This will prevent subversion form conniving politicians. Kudos to the Agong; the Yang DiPertuan has strengthened the reins of democracy by his declaration and thus forcing Parliament to meet.

Ban Cheng Tan
Ban Cheng Tan
29 Jul 2021 5.29pm

Misleading Parliament is an act of contempt that can cause the dismissal of a Cabinet Minister from any self-respecting House. It is also contempt for the people of the entire country that any Parliament theoretically represents.

These basic rules are honoured in Parliaments and local councils adopting the Westminster model. However, sadly, in Malaysia, this is not the case.

It is about time that we in Malaysia adopt such basic rules since these instills the respect for honesty and integrity in the intercourse of Malaysians with our public institutions. Is it too much to have this legitimate expectation?

The Agong’s latest statement on this grave matter is duly noted, especially his earlier wish to have the Emergency debated.