Is the default culture infecting Pakatan Harapan?

5
13489
Photograph: mole.my

The same old people have suddenly become credible enough to undertake the responsibility of looking into procurement and governance in the ministries and civil service, laments K Haridas.

I am particularly disappointed by the special investigation committee on procurement, governance and finance set up to probe into affairs within the Ministry of Defence.

This committee was set up by the cabinet upon the request of the ministry. Their jurisdiction is wide; they will also discuss issues regarding other ministries that need to be probed.

Same ol’, same ol’

I thought things would be different with Pakatan Harapan’s (PH) approach. It seems to be the same old people who have suddenly become credible enough to undertake such a responsibility.

While I do have great regard for chairman Ambrin Buang, it is disappointing that he, having known what was in the auditor general’s report, did not have the spine to stand up to the powers that be.

As an appointee by the Yang Di Pertuan Agong, he could have gone to call on His Highness and requested his assistance knowing the gravity of the issues at hand. That said, he may have done so – I am not privy to this fact.

These are leaders in high positions who are well paid and it is unfair for us not to have expectations that they will do what is necessary. The same goes for Gani Patail, Zeti Akhtar Aziz of Bank Negara and others who knew the rot but did not stand up for the interests of the nation.

It was interesting that Dr Mahathir Mohamad lamented the lack of credible people and that one may need to go down one or two levels before finding such people within the present civil service. Yet he and his cabinet choose people who should have given greater leadership but failed.

Some of them are now selected to be on these committees. We have the former head of the Institute Integrity Malaysia and the present head both in this committee. So much was expected from these leaders that many feel disappointed.

READ MORE:  PH government after one year: Good record - but could be much better

What have they done over the last nine years of Najib’s rule but follow their leader. Loyalty it seems was more important than integrity. Perhaps there was a level of fear that many of us may not appreciate.

Institut Integrity Malaysia had national integrity plans, trained integrity officers, and one felt that something was being infused into the system. All this failed; so should one not ask the hard questions and hold this institute and its leadership accountable?

If there is no leadership from the top – people taking a stand, walking the talk and paying the price – how are those down the line to be inspired? Even serious-minded integrity officers have had to face challenges but no one stood by them. Why not induct the greatest of them all Senator Paul Low so that PH can continue this sham?

These are the same people, who are themselves tainted but now seem to have some credibility to look into the infections of others. This is akin to what Umno would do and is not in any way different.

Get civil society reps on board

Look at the composition of the committee. Is this a Malaysian committee? Are there not people more credible who could participate in such an investigation committee? Let us call a spade a spade and hold PH leaders to a higher level of accountability.

Good people with credibility like Rafizi Ramli, Tian Chua, Terence Gomez, KJ John, Brig General (rtd) Arshad Raji and his team, and others from NGOs such as the Center to Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4), Aliran, Suaram can all fit the bill. They bring more credibility than those assembled today.

They will bring a mindset that is quite different from many of those in the civil service who, having spent years serving their masters, lack the moral and ethical spine to take a stand. Recent events have just confirmed this reality. Let us try and recall a ‘towering Malaysian’ who has emerged from the civil service over the last two decades.

READ MORE:  Economic Action Council should act fast on G25 Agenda

These very people who were tainted by their silence and lack of action will try and justify their inability to take a stand. However they try, we the people expect a higher standard from such leaders for the status and position they hold. If such people do not take a stand, who will? If conscience is rationalised away, nothing valuable remains.

Sadly, PH seems to have forgotten the many who stood by, fought for the cause and took so much action to make a difference. Adn now we see how this opportunity is being misused with the some of the same spineless people leading such investigations. If we are really serious about change, we have to take challenging steps that will make a difference. We need people who will ask the hard questions.

This requires a major shift – not a civil service mindset nor an academic approach. Such a shift could well be provided by those in civil society. Here you will find people working for a pittance. But they are large-hearted in terms of the causes they represent and the commitment they bring to their work. They bring experience, not theories, in standing up for Integrity.

C4 and their initiatives with the Scorpene scandal would give them valuable insights. They will be in a position to make the necessary inquiries that will make a difference. Having an auditor’s mind or claiming to be part of an institute that has failed does not give them this privilege.

Cleanse the civil service

We are not being serious. Let us call a spade a spade. This is the singular failure of the PH component parties, who more than any other group have worked with the alternative sector. Do they not realise they could be sucked into this default culture created by Umno and BN?

Cleanse the civil service and hold accountable those in positions of responsibility. Without such decisive action, why should people even change? To begin with, bring in those who could give leadership with a difference.

READ MORE:  One year on, time for PH to refocus economy to address plight of bottom 40%

Their key option would be to lay down significant milestones that would be needed in the creation of a new culture of responsibility within the civil service. You cannot wish this to happen for you are working in an environment that is not positive and enabling to the values and convictions that PH holds to be true and needed.

Does PH have a vision for the civil service? If not, they will soon be manipulated by the default and contaminated culture that today prevails in the Malaysian civil service. They will represent the bastion that stands against change and in inculcating a Malaysian spirit.

The government would do well also to appoint a professional auditor from the private sector to become the auditor general if they are serious about change. Such an individual would cleanse the civil service of the mentality that what belong to the government belongs to me. Serious audits with action being taken and people taken to task is essential. This will plug many of the leakages and save us more badly needed money. The leader will set the tone for the new culture.

Having contributed to Tabung Harapan, we have the moral right and authority to call a spade a spade and to express our utmost disgust at the Umno-style of leadership that PH is beginning to follow in this case. Where are the people who stand up for values like honesty, courage, unselfishness and a desire to make a difference?

Civil society groups have much to offer. In the spirit of being Malaysian, consider them. Otherwise, we end up with a ‘ketuanan Melayu’ approach, which was not the cause for which many stood up. If you do not stand for what is right and proper, you will be sucked in by the default culture, which is based on rent-seeking, positions and titles – all reeking of self-interest and greed.

Thanks for dropping by! Apart from the views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed, the opinions in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation of whatever amount you can afford to sustain Aliran. Please make payments to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.

And why not become an Aliran member or subscribe to our FREE newsletters.

5
Join the conversation

avatar
750
4 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
Sabah power brokerSahamMa LeeTeo Chuen TickLG Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Saham
Saham

A critical view of the existing civil service. PH govt should take note and act upon it. I would suggest those top civil servants who have failed to stand up against corrupt politicians should be given compulsory retirement in the interest of the nation as provided for under the constitution. This will give a sense of seriousness and urgency among civil servants

Ma Lee

Yes pathetic!

Sabah power broker
Sabah power broker

Old culture is renewed and probably given a new name but the disease remains uncured and digging a deeper trench in the minds of the masses called the civil service. This is a dangerous game. Something akin to blindsiding your trusted friends. Ditch your friends, and they could be pointing the gun at you. The rakyat are not idiots.
If PH only pays lip service to the rakyat that voted them into power, don’t underestimate the people’s power!

Teo Chuen Tick

The leaders in PH will say people like you , Haridas is picking hairs!! You, and civil society elements do not know how hard it is to govern. But the fact of the matter is that the PH govt.to date has not made any firm moves towards better governance and accountability . Your examples above validates this point!!

LG
LG

There’s no need to doubt the integrity of those appointed. Let them do their job first.