Sinovac vs Pfizer booster? In a quandary

Ultimately, it comes down to the individual’s choice, Jem writes


Recently, we heard that many new admissions into Covid hospitals were those who had received two doses of Sinovac.

Health Minister Khairy Jamaluddin then informed us we should get the Pfizer booster dose as soon as possible. This is especially for those who have had the Sinovac vaccine from China because its effectiveness apparently wanes after a few months. He said there were now more Sinovac-vaccinated patients admitted to the Sungai Buloh Hospital.

How frightening is this for those of us who had received Sinovac, especially for those who were not given any choice.

Some questions need answering. Why did the government put so many of us in a quandary now by saying back then that we – the elderly and not-so-elderly – could get the Sinovac vaccination?

Many of us, at some point, read about the different vaccines and their percentages of effectiveness. But nobody from the government really explained what all of this really meant.

Maybe nobody knew, which is doubtful – or maybe they did not expect another wave to come and that a booster would be needed.

And then, having nearly 25 million people vaccinated gave the government the confidence to allow interstate travel and reopen most of the economy. 

But once interstate travel, along with everything else, was allowed, new cases would obviously rise. So did this reopening mark the onset of another wave coming through?

Didn’t the Malaysian government, its then health minister and its then innovation minister know back then that the effectiveness of the Sinovac vaccine was low or would wane over time?

READ MORE:  Mengapa Parlimen perlu dibuka?

If this was known then, why did the government even buy these vaccines? Was there an agreement or quid pro quo with China? Was it because the vaccines were given free by China, which already had Covid under control? Was there a stockpile of vaccines in China to be given away to other countries – and Malaysia was one of the many recipients?

With the rise in hospital cases, especially those who were vaccinated with Sinovac, we are now informed that if people prefer to get the Sinovac booster, they would have to pay for it.

Why? Is it because the government will no longer be getting free Sinovac vaccines from China? As the vaccines must be purchased, are the Malaysian public now expected to reimburse the government or the company responsible?  

There might be many of us Sinovac-vaccinated people who are now in a quandary. Do we believe what we have been told by the government and go get the Pfizer booster? Or do we get the Sinovac booster and pay for it? This is not an ideal position to be in.

Added to all this frustration is the process of getting an appointment date for the booster shot using the MySejahtera app. If you are unable to accept the date given, you are told to wait 30 days for another date. If you were able to get the original appointment within 24 hours, why should it take another 30 days for another date?

Then on 23 November, the local media said one could walk into any private vaccination centre to register and get a date for the booster. So I went into the Protect Health website to register myself, only to find that there was no record of any centre around where I reside. I could not find an icon to click for further information. So, another frustrating day! I wish somebody would explain all this to me.

READ MORE:  Kleptokrasi mula tular ke dalam program imunisasi Covid?

I know these vaccines are not a cure for the virus and they are just to provide some measure of protection. Something like the flu shots? 

Surely the ministers concerned and the Ministry of Health will have all the relevant data to make an honest decision for the good of the people and the national healthcare system, wouldn’t you think?

Ultimately, it comes down to the individual’s choice. Pfizer (free) or Sinovac (pay). Good luck, everybody.

Jem, an Aliran reader, still cares deeply about Sabah, despite having lived in the peninsula for some time

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
28 Nov 2021 11.22am

Isn’t it interesting to find out whether Sinovac is actually not effective as claimed by the minister (who was the first one to have the Sinovac), and is it effective for him? Moreover, if we assume if 50% of the 1.4 billion in China were vaccinated with Sinovac and if Sinovac isn’t effective how come the infected number in China is very low (single or at the most double digits) comparing to USA where most of the hundred to two hundred million being vaccinated with Pfizer and their current daily number that got infected is over 100,000?

Phua Kai Lit
27 Nov 2021 8.51am

My first two vaccine shots were Sinovac. My booster shot was Pzifer. Only side effect after Pzifer shot was a stiff and slightly swollen shoulder.

Note: my preference, based on my reading of the public health scientific literature and research findings, was Pzifer (an mRNA vaccine) right from the beginning. (After some initial hesitation about the new mRNA vaccine technology, before the research findings came out).