Are we all equal under the law?

5
372 views
What happened to the famous Lady of Justice? - Image: jessica45/Pixabay

Dominic Damian reflects on the moral issues surrounding the enactment and enforcement of laws.

A serious question about our politics and laws emerges when one of the best among us leaves the scene. Rafizi Ramli’s retirement from politics and judges’ acceptance of commercial positions provides a stark contrast.

Some eminent judges have no qualms about relinquishing their judicial robes and putting on commercial garments after retirement. This seems to be a natural progression.

Questions arise:

  • Are the judges’ qualifications and quality of a calibre that makes them far more valuable to commercial enterprises?
  • Is this a progression that genuinely contributes? Or is this for financial gain?

What I put forward are thoughts shared by a Malay professor whose ideals are aligned to my feelings. We never think about laws until they affect us or someone we know. Even the best-intended laws may wound humanity. The coterie of laws is conceived with interpretative limitations to suit the comfort and conveniences of the majority.

The law is constricted, and sometimes a lack of magnanimity is evident.

The disadvantaged are disproportionately represented in the justice system. The prison system is a testament to this disparity. Criminality arising from dilapidated or disadvantaged environments is often not taken into account. A lack of financial means translates to a tooth-pick defence, if at all they can find a lawyer. And so, they are often doomed, caught in a complex never-ending web.

In contrast, the powerful and well-heeled enjoy the benefit of a premium defence. They whose criminality appears intentional and international have enough resources to hire a phalanx of lawyers.

A question of housing

The law sometimes lacks sensitivity and can be ruthless and remorseless. The marginalised are deprived of the basic right to affordable housing and treated as expendable. Policy moves to resolve this issue often appear cosmetic.

READ MORE:  Set up royal commission to probe judicial misconduct allegations - Suhakam

Parliamentarians will offer assistance in such circumstances. The obvious profit here is political power.

It seems like one is at the mercy of those with financial clout.

When we say we follow the ’rule of law’, we must remember who writes the laws, changes the laws and prescribes the laws – parliamentarians. The responsibility to remove unjust laws, change or upgrade them is within their scope.

A recent case of families being evicted from where they have stayed for three generations illustrates the problem.

The settlers clear the land and start life.

The government later sells the same land to some developer.

The developer exercises the legal right to develop the property.

The uprooted are turned into “illegal squatters” overnight.

The government of the day is clueless and powerless.

The affected settlers are offered a pittance.

Taxpayers’ funds are used to mitigate the problem.

The law once again becomes helpless. If this were not a tragedy, it would be a comedy. It is a vicious cycle.

Power-crazed leaders and oppressive laws


Laws are often used against critics without hesitation. Some who may be innocent are detained under oppressive laws designed for suppression and subjugation. Political megalomaniacs and delinquent psychopaths will always be on a witch-hunt to usurp laws for their own ends.

Double-crossing political leaders, some parliamentarians and parties end up as subservient political eunuchs. They may serve corporate interests or themselves have vested interests.

Frustrated citizens may feel these leaders should be impeached and removed from their gilded seats of power – which may not be a far-fetched solution.

READ MORE:  Establish a law commission: Foster public trust and confidence

Several of these lawmakers are also ‘lawbreakers’! Just look at their uncouth and shameless behaviour as they utter profane words in the august house of Parliament.

A higher moral law, a spiritual presence even

Turning to a higher moral law (in contrast to legal laws) that appeal to conscience is often ineffective. NGOs and socially concerned groups usually subscribe and submit to the former. Unfortunately, these groups are often derided and defeated.

Some have a personal belief in a spiritual presence, which intuitively compels them to struggle for that which is meaningful and purposeful. These are the idealistic voiceless, who usually lose the most.

The compelling conviction that a higher incontestable law exists above democracy, above a moral law and every other law is always ignored or crushed.  Some even interpret and misuse divine law to promote greed, power and racial separation.

Are we not entrusted to decipher the mandate of the heavens? Is it not a responsibility to seek good beyond the norms of comfort? But humanity is unfortunately arrogant.

The sense of the sacred that that we encounter while engaging in the living treasures of life is repeatedly broken by covenants of an ordinary mandate. We have, in reality, only a limited understanding of morality and righteousness.

Should this not encourage us to embark on a relentless search for illumination and betterment? When the mandate of trust to honour, care, protect and uplift life, the environment and all living creatures is abused – the heavens break the bond with humanity!

With the eye of the soul, we have to rehabilitate, restore and redeem those who engage in criminality from their own frailties, vulnerabilities and wounds. Otherwise, how do we seize and lay claim to the struggle to be virtuous and innocent?

READ MORE:  Set up royal commission to probe judicial misconduct allegations - Suhakam

Love of the law?

Within legal circles, there are those who profess to love the law passionately. One must ask a couple of fundamental questions though:

  • Is the law in service of humanity or the reverse?
  • Does that love for the law exceed (love for) humanity?

We need to align the compass of our justice system and laws to better serve humanity.

If the law is considered sacrosanct, so must its twin – judicial dignity. If judicial officers are eventually drawn by the commercial or political sphere of life, it raises the question, by implication, whether they were ever fully moulded or formed as guardians of the law. It suggests their remuneration in retirement cannot withstand the enticement of monetisation.

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ravi Nair
Ravi Nair
2 Jan 2020 11.23am

As an obedient Tax payers for the last 34 years my answer to the above Question is No.
The set of rules are different when in comes to being a Non Muslim in my own country.
Very Sad & Ashamed of being treated as 3rd class citizen in Malaysia.

Gursharan Singh
Gursharan Singh
30 Dec 2019 10.36am

ALL ARE EQUAL UNDER THE LAW – SO STATES THE CONSTITUTION

Could the problem be ENFORCEMENT WHICH MAY BE AND BE PERCEIVED AS SELECTIVE BY some ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES/OFFICERS where SOME OF WHOM MAY be BIASED TO FAVOR THEIR SENIORS-BOSSES-RELATIVES-OWN KIND or MAY ALSO PERFORM OR NOT PERFORM IF DUE CONSIDERATION IS AGREED?

Auditor General has been reporting his findings annually for decades but there is little evidence of public being aware of any action taken in most cases on findings where some may be suspected to be involved in alleged MISMANAGEMENT-FRAUD-CORRUPTION-COLLUSION-CRONYISM-EMBEZZLEMENT–BRIBERY-KICKBACKS-NEPOTISM acts.
In the past ACA and now its successor MACC had also investigated many cases of suspected of MFCCCEBKN acts.

Santana Kl
Santana Kl
28 Dec 2019 8.45pm

This article begs the question whether justice should be blind. I remember a few months ago a mother was sent to jail for stealing baby milk powder from a super market. I felt so sad reading the case. I was asking myself how come the super market management has no heart to forgive the poor mother for stealing to feed her baby. Why is the magistrate so heartless to sentence the mother to jail. Didn’t he/she consider the circumstances of the poor mother. What will happen to the baby when the mother goes to jail. Won’t the child suffer from trauma with the sudden disappearance of the mother. Why no lawyers came forward to plead for the poor mother. Is justice well served by jailing the mother. This is the sad state of justice in our country.

Gursharan Singh
Gursharan Singh
30 Dec 2019 10.01pm
Reply to  Santana Kl

Worldwide justice may be blind but those assigned to dispense and manage justice may be perceived to be partly blind when one reads the judgements around the world when high flying white collar professionals involved in suspected frauds/bribes escape with negotiated financial penalties while small time thieves involved even in necessities get prison terms.
People may not question the sentences as it may be perceived to be contempt of court.

Gram Massla
Gram Massla
24 Dec 2019 4.54am

Oh dear. Where do we begin? In the first place the question is out of kilter. No sir, we are not. How can we be equal under the law when the law reflects the tenets of the Constitution which itself is unequal? The answer to that will answer your question.