Systems must be made foolproof, not easily tampered with

1
64
At the Immigration Department
Photograph: amdtaufik.com

Angry Malaysian wonders what kind of internal control system are in place to prevent falsification or tampering of data in computerised systems for cash collections.

I refer to the latest ‘wonder’ arising out of Malaysia – rouge immigration officers masterminded a scheme to issue receipts and collect payments from normal passport applicants and then change the status in the system later to OKU (people with disabilities) and pocket the fees received.

How on earth can you do this in any system and if so, was the system not properly designed – or purposely not properly designed?

Any good system including accounting packages should allow for amendments after the initial postings but the original postings will still show; you should not be able to erase them completely.

Obviously, like many such cases, this immigration payment collection and receipt issuance system was not designed with safeguards and perhaps not properly tested by experienced personnel including accountants and fraud detection experts to ensure no loopholes. Utterly and totally ridiculous.

Was there no reconciliation of the receipts issued, their running numbers and the total amount collected? Even the ice kacang stall owner in Damansara Uptown food court has a system to check on his personnel: he apparently tallies the numbers of plastic bowls used with the money collected to see if the stall staff are siphoning money.

I wonder how many such cases are going on elsewhere in Malaysia especially where different categories pay different rates.

Talking about systems, there has been a lot of discussion in the press about how the traffic summons system of the police, the Road Transport Department and the Land Transport Public Transport Commission (Spad) cannot ‘talk’ to one another.

READ MORE:  1MDB: Dissecting one of the world's biggest financial scandals

The problem should not be why the systems do not talk to one another. The issue is, why on earth are the systems different in the first place? All three traffic enforcers should be using a single system that allows the various users to log in or sign on. This is what it should have been if the system had been properly thought through in the first place.

This is a unique Malaysian feature where we have multiple agencies enforcing traffic-related laws. Most countries have only one sole authority: the traffic police.

Oh boy, now that I have suggested a single system, I am sure lights will be burning through the night as someone will be busy preparing a proposal to be submitted while rubbing his or her hands with glee.

Angry Malaysian is the pseudonym of an Aliran reader who is always angry because the bright future of Malaysia has been eroded by incompetence, nepotism, apathy, laziness, racism, double standards and arrogance.

Sign Aliran's 'Save our Democracy" petition
Sign Aliran's petition calling for a review of the decision to grant Riza Aziz a DNAA
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Thuraisingham Shan
7 Feb 2017 5.49pm

This is the familiar Makaysiann syndrome- MAS Mana Ada Ststem