What next after Ola Bola? Wanton Badminton?

We don’t really need more films to remind us about what’s wrong with our country – but we need to ask ourselves what we are doing to help rectify the problems, says Adrian Lee.

The launch of Ola Bola made many reminisce about Malaysia’s “good old days”. The “good old days” is a time from Merdeka till the 1970s, when most Malaysians supposedly looked beyond race or religion.

Those were the days when Ah Meng, Ali and Raju could cycle or fly kites without bothering about who was Malay, Indian or Chinese.

In reality, it is no longer common to find Malaysians from the various ethnic groups eating, playing or studying together. Even shopping trolleys and IT malls seem to be based on user demographics.

In so doing, Ola Bola tried to highlight how Malaysians today are increasingly demarcated by ethnicity and religion unlike earlier years. The film has been praised for its metaphorical reminders that success and unity can be achieved by setting aside racial and religious differences.

From a cultural studies perspective, which regards cinema as a site of contestations, Ola Bola could be viewed as criticising rising race and religious issues.

Even without watching the film, anyone keeping abreast with the latest developments in Malaysian politics should know that race and religious relations have been on a steady decline for the past 30 years.

Lest I be accused of raining on Ola Bola’s parade of praises, this display of “feel-good” unity is akin to preaching to the choir: the generation of Malaysians from the “good old days” in which the film’s plot was set would be familiar with the underlying theme of the movie.

READ MORE:  Speaking truth to power

Those who need to understand unity the most would be today’s youths. But can Malaysian youths, who’ve been indoctrinated to study, eat, play and love mainly from their respective ethnic and religious groups relate to this sense of unity espoused by an earlier generation?

Despite claiming to have a multiracial cast, Ola Bola didn’t portray a balanced representation of Malaysia’s ethnic makeup. Not present are the other ethnic communities that ultimately make Malaysia “truly Asia”.

The cinema industry doesn’t exist in a vacuum but within a society in which its issues are contextualised. The cinema industry is also a capitalist venture designed to generate maximum profit.

As Ola Bola wasn’t independently produced with a small budget nor screened for free, it could be argued the film exploited nation-building efforts and disunity for profits.
Within two weeks, the film made more than RM12m. Just how much of this would be used for nation-building efforts to “unite us as a nation” as claimed by the film’s many advertisements?

During a radio interview, one of the film’s main characters was asked, if he considers Ola Bola a success? The answer: it would be considered a success when it makes RM20m.

If the producers are really genuine about promoting unity and harmony, perhaps Ola Bola should be screened for free in schools and colleges so that its message of unity can reach more young Malaysians.

The film also doesn’t discuss other issues such as the pitiful state of Malaysian football. Instead, the repetitive airing of the film’s slogans informs us: “You will believe again.” In Malaysian football?

READ MORE:  Serbuan ke pejabat Freedom Film Network – sebuah serangan ke atas kebebasan bereskpresi

This is misleading for in reality, our national team nicknamed Harimau Malaya isn’t roaring: it currently ranks 171 amongst 204 countries in the Fifa world rankings.

Despite spending millions annually on football development, we rank below nations such as Antigua and Barbuda, Nicaragua, St Vincent and the Grenadines, and war-torn Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine.

What about the state of sportsmanship and respect for gender in Malaysian sports? Are we mature enough to not accuse women’s volleyball outfits of being part of a Jewish conspiracy?

Or to admire the gracefulness and skills of a gymnast instead of being fixated on her leotards? Or to graciously admit defeat rather than burn flares and assault fans from visiting teams?

For the past 15 years, Malaysian cinema has already been moving towards having a more collective sense of representation through films such as Sepet, Bukak Api and Gadoh.

These films have contested critical issues and provided a space for the marginalised, which Ola Bola didn’t. Yet, Ola Bola, which remains a capitalist enterprise, does provide a breath of fresh air from the usual “hantu”, cinta and gangster formulas and is a strong contender for accolades.

It wouldn’t be surprising that a film about the 1992 Thomas Cup winning team would be produced next. The film could be titled Wanton Badminton and would be a box office success by merely saying it was produced to cultivate national unity.

And the film might court (pun intended) controversy by changing the ethnicity of the individual who made the winning smash that won Malaysia the Thomas Cup. But lest we forget, it was ultimately a team effort that won the Cup for Malaysia.

READ MORE:  Intimidasi polis ke atas penggiat seni yang mendesak perubahan dikecam

At the grassroots level, most Malaysians understand the need for unity and moderation. It is the few extremists and fanatics that occasionally attempt to throw us off track.

So there remains much work to be done in terms of unity and nation building. We are after all a team that is only 59 years young with a future to look forward to.

While the good life of yore may be a necessary reminder and incentive for present Malaysians to build a better nation, it may also be best that many stop constantly feeling nostalgic in envisioning a utopian nation built on past greatness. We wouldn’t want to live on past glories or be stuck in past mistakes.

Rather than be nation constantly on the rewind, it would be best to envision a Malaysia with a better future. We don’t really need more films to remind us about what’s wrong with our country – but we need to ask ourselves what we are doing to help rectify these problems.

As we continue demanding that everyone be recognised as Malaysians, are we truly prepared to believe in letting go of the need to recognise ourselves based on our own ethnicities?

Well, the ball – or shuttlecock – is in your court.

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Soakkoon Wong
Soakkoon Wong
24 Feb 2016 7.14am

Very well-written piece.

24 Feb 2016 12.52am

at least the article has infused a realm of alternative discussion, as all this while we only heard the superlative appraisals on the movie without even bothered to look on the critical part of ‘venture capitalism’ behind the movie. a wonderful piece of writing Dr ! Your sarcasm is something that has to be learned and reflected !

23 Feb 2016 6.30pm

Dr Adrian here is not bashing the movie or preferring movies like KL Gangster. Instead, he is lamenting the fact that the movie stops short while it could have done more. Instead of running the full marathon against racism, it only runs to where it’s comfortable aka producing enough profit.

More could have been done, but was not. Like yi07 said, it was merely a decent movie. Dr Adrian here expresses his opinion that it could have been a great movie if it was really pushing for unity in terms of its marketing (like showing it for free in schools) than just a feel good film for Malaysians that might just be put in the back of the head when two superheroes lock horns in the future.

To summarize the point with a question would be ‘Was this film’s priority challenging racist notions of today or for profit?’ It does appear that profit was priority while other sentiments were just passengers.

23 Feb 2016 5.58pm

The problem with “good” is relativity. For many, a good film is one that entertains, like a body jerker so to speak. Horror films scares. Melodrama purports one to tear up. Comedy make us gasp for air from laughter.

But for some of us, we believe a good film is one that details and discusses issues pertinent to a nation, society or culture. And some want awesome jaw dropping cinematography or sound design.

For most, accolades and milestones are crucial in describing a good film.

It’s easy to get defensive for something one likes. It’s not easy to accept or view criticisms as constructive. Why point finger? When we truly accept diversity, we will truly accept varying opinions.

Live and let live I say.

23 Feb 2016 3.15pm

Adrian Lee. Ola Bola is one of the most patriotic movie Msia has ever produced. It has attracted people of all races to watch it. Sure, it is not perfect. But that is not the point. It tells us what Msia used to be, before racism divided us all.I don’t understand why you keep bashing this movie until I read the end that you are also a filmmaker. All I can say is you are just jealous. And you will never make one half as good! I challenge you to do so.

23 Feb 2016 5.31pm
Reply to  Phil

Hi Phil, I think you completely missed the writer’s point of the article. This article is merely an eloquently written, unbiased analysis of the content of the film. I must emphasize on the word ‘content’. I say this because he doesn’t discredit the fact that it was a beautifully made film, he doesn’t discredit the fact that it was a breath of fresh air in comparison to other local films that are so commonly themed along the lines of ghosts, rempits, gangsters and unfaithful husbands. He also doesn’t discredit the fact that it did successfully bring out a sense of patriotism amongst a large majority of it’s viewers. And more than that, i see no criticism on his part about the crafting of the film, so..No, I highly doubt that this article is a result of jealousy. However, i do stand with him to question if our sense of patriotism has been reduced to simply seeing different races being represented on film and the usage of all 3 languages in a single film. Isn’t patriotism much more than that? This article brings to light how much… Read more »

23 Feb 2016 10.56am

“It wouldn’t be surprising that a film about the 1992 Thomas Cup winning team would be produced next. The film could be titled Wanton Badminton and would be a box office success by merely saying it was produced to cultivate national unity.” It’s still preferable to KL Gangster or Isteri untuk dijual. I suspect you feel this film needs to measure up to the social political claims of unity and nation building because you bought their spiel in the first place. It’s a movie… it doesnt measure up in any way at all… it’s not a political movement etc. and in promoting movies they make .. claims which only sheeple believe and the rest realise it’s all marketing. Ola Bola is merely a decent movie (by malaysian standards) doing great at the local box office because its competitors are terrible. Nothing more nothing less. Only when one buys into their marketing spiel would one then expect it to be more than what it really is. By the way which local movie is nation building? Yasmin Ahmad stuff? same same too Many have criticised it for not… Read more »