How do thee revolt? Let me count the ways

3
51 views

Contrary to the unfounded fear propagated by the ruling elites, the participants of Bersih 3.0 are not bent on overthrowing the government via revolutionary means, observes Azmil Mohd Tayeb.

The oft-quoted though wrongly-attributed apocryphal remark “Let them eat cake!” epitomises the arrogance and obliviousness of an Ancien Régime that is tone deaf to the plight and suffering of the common people. (The phrase first appeared in Jean-Jacques Rosseau’s Confessions (1765) but the character who uttered it has been popularly albeit erroneously attributed to Marie Antoinette, the wife of Louis XVI, the last king before the 1789 French Revolution.) It is the proverbial pride that precedes the inevitable fall.

The same parallels can be drawn with the current BN regime in Malaysia. Instead of honestly addressing the grievances of the common Malaysians, which culminated in a formidable display of force and solidarity in the recent Bersih 3.0 rally, the BN regime and its apparatuses opt for a hardline approach.

Similar to the French paysans that had finally tolerated enough of the Versailles’ excesses and elitism, many Malaysians, particularly the young, urban and middle class, have also decided that the systemic rot that has plagued the nation for so long and sustained the decades of unbroken rule of the BN regime needs to be seriously overhauled.

The slew of scandals and abuses of power by the ruling elite leading up to the Bersih 3.0 rally ultimately pushed a lot of people into becoming proactive citizens, as opposed to passive ones, whose sole democratic act is to only vote every four years, and nothing else.

The question that lingers in the smoky aftermath of Bersih 3.0 rally is whether this will be the Malaysian equivalent of the storming of Bastille. Or to use a more contemporary analogy, will Dataran Merdeka be a catalytic symbol as Tahrir Square was to the recent Egyptian revolution? Or rather, on a less dramatic note, will it usher in a new era of reform that is far reaching yet not as socially disruptive as a revolution?

The regime reacted as if the Bersih 3.0 participants were the modern reincarnation of the pitchfork-wielding French paysans laying siege to the entrenched establishment with their guillotine in tow. Prime Minister Najib Razak and his predecessor, Mahathir Mohamad, called it an attempt to overthrow the government. The former Inspector General of Police, Hanif Omar, who has been incredulously selected to head the Bersih 3.0 investigating panel, accused the rally participants of employing “communist tactics” and attempting a coup, thus raising the spectre of the failed Communist Party of Malaya insurgency in the 1950s and 1960s.

READ MORE:  Belasungkawa kepada rakan Bersih 2.0 yang telah pergi pada tahun 2019 (Malay/English)

One can argue that if we are to go by history, mass revolution seems highly unlikely to break out in Malaysia. While we might have experienced blood-soaked struggles for social transformation in the past, major upheavals brought upon by revolution are rare still. Even at the height of the Reformasi movement in 1998-99, when the legitimacy of the BN regime was at its lowest ebb, the ruling elite managed to stay unified and ultimately prevailed in the face of immense public pressure for change.

Fast forward ten years later we are now confronted with the same scenario. Standing on the precipice of a history-making moment, Malaysians now face the choice of making a leap of faith into the relative unknown or returning to the charred apocalyptic landscape of the old. The sheer number of Bersih 3.0 participants alone suggests that many Malaysians have decided to take the plunge. There is simply no turning back.

What we are witnessing here, at this particular juncture in time, is our collective ability to effect serious changes in the country. It might not be in the manner of Indonesia’s 1998 Reformasi or the Arab Spring, but the changes will be no less meaningful and far-reaching. The unifying theme is the toppling of a long-entrenched regime but the difference is the way we Malaysians go about it.

Bersih 3.0 is quintessentially the Malaysian idea of transforming society. It marks a shift in the way that people situate themselves in relation to others. It is no longer only about me and my comfortable middle-class lifestyle. We are now Malaysians, linking hands in solidarity as comrades-in-suffering.

The overarching theme of Bersih 3.0 is simple and to be honest, relatively innocuous: the demand for clean and fair election. But in its simplicity lies a myriad of semiotics as it becomes a canvass onto which its supporters project their hopes and fears.

The Bersih 3.0 movement has now embodied the symbols of people’s frustration with the conceit and callousness of the deeply entrenched ruling elite; the broken dreams of heavily-indebted yet unemployed young people; the culture of corruption and impunity; the indefensible preservation of an out-dated and unjust social system; and many others. These symbols of exasperation find their solace in the Bersih 3.0’s struggle to clean up Malaysia’s severely-flawed electoral system, the meta-symbol of everything that is wrong in this country.

But still, just because Dataran Merdeka does not turn out to be the Malaysian version of Tahrir Square, it does not mean that the people’s clamour for change has come to naught. Running battles with the police on the street is but one of many means to achieve one’s ends.

READ MORE:  Belasungkawa kepada rakan Bersih 2.0 yang telah pergi pada tahun 2019 (Malay/English)

The socio-economic situation in Malaysia is not dire enough as to warrant such revolutionary tactics – at least not single-handedly. The middle-class folks might have been rethinking their political orientation and self-interest for the sake of the common good but at the end of the day they would all have returned to their suburban haven and cushy white-collar professional jobs. They demand change but not at the expense of greater risk and cost required by a more revolutionary way. Call it the ‘reformed middle-class conundrum’.

Bear in mind that for the past few decades the BN regime, despite all its shortcomings, has indeed managed to bring material comfort and satisfaction to a vast segment of Malaysian society i.e. its middle-class.

The transformation of the Malaysian middle-class psyche in recent years has been no mean feat as it requires the sacrifice of long-standing personal comfort and stability. The same people in the past who might have grumbled in private but kept their heads down in public are now seeing muted acquiescence as no longer a tolerable option.

Yet, the change they want shall not be attained through the barrel of a gun and should be pursued through constitutionally-sanctioned means that offer the least amount of disruption to their established life. This is what makes the Bersih 3.0 sit-in protest an attractive option for these reform-minded bourgeois. Heavy-handed retaliation from the regime would only strengthen their resolve and further confirm their belief that the status quo is indeed in serious disrepair and simply irredeemable.

Revolution becomes the means of social change when all other options have been exhausted. The longevity of the current regime is essentially due to its ability to promote the illusion that there is a glimmer of democratic space amidst the dark miasmic edifice of its quasi-authoritarian rule; hence the proclivity of society to pursue change via constitutionally-bounded ways, either as part of the civil society or a political party. Reform is still possible through the combination of ballot box and persistent street protests, obviating the need for a more radical and confrontational approach.

If Malaysia had been a country of stark socio-economic disparity ruled by the classic kleptomaniac despots – to a certain it is but not severe enough – then revolution would have found a more accepting ground. The raspy croon of Janis Joplin says it best that “freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose.” When a young Malaysian burger seller decides to self-immolate in-front of Seri Perdana as a symbol of protest only then will Malaysia be prime and ready for a conventional revolution. Until that time comes there is still hope for other less painful avenues to fulfil one’s burning desire for reform – no pun intended.

READ MORE:  Belasungkawa kepada rakan Bersih 2.0 yang telah pergi pada tahun 2019 (Malay/English)

This is not in any way to trivialise the contribution of the lower class and the less privileged. In fact, it is the marginalised groups that have been at the forefront of the struggle for social justice and peace all these years. Without them out in the barricades, absorbing blows after crushing blows from the indiscriminating police batons and setting the example of acting courageously in defence of personal principles, the huge influx of middle-class participants in recent rallies would have been unlikely. They are the so-called canary in the mine, paving the way for the more risk-averse dissenters to confidently air out their grievances in public.

Equally emboldened and inspired by the selfless acts of the downtrodden, the middle-class folks finally feel the strong urge to go to step out of their comfort zone and go to the streets.

This is the beauty of the Bersih movement. It not only brings together people from various races, ethnic backgrounds, religions, social classes and sexual orientations, but also more importantly serves as a vehicle of political expression by people who hitherto had been too complacent and intimidated to let their grouses be known publicly. It is 1Malaysia in its most unadulterated and representative form, undreamed of even by the wildest imagination of the PM’s spinmeister, as it shows the belief in fairness, justice and common good is widely and genuinely shared by a broad cross-section of society.

Contrary to the unfounded fear propagated by the ruling elites, the participants of Bersih 3.0 are not bent on overthrowing the government via revolutionary means. It is precisely the need to effect changes through legitimate democratic means that propels the participants to join the movement in the first place. Unless, of course, it is revolution that the regime wants, in which case it can continue to plunder and destroy the country at the current rate until the people are left with no other choice but to stage a bloody revolution. In that case there will not be enough cake, or curry puffs for that matter, in the realm to save the regime from its own impending demise.

Azmil Mohd Tayeb, an Aliran member, is an academic teaching in one of our universities

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Avatar
Dr Azmil Tayeb, the honorary secretary of Aliran, is a political science lecturer at Universiti Sains Malaysia. He is the winner of the 2019 Colleagues' Choice book prize (social science category) awarded by the International Convention of Asia Scholars for his book Islamic Education in Indonesia and Malaysia: Shaping Minds, Saving Souls.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hilmi Ismail
Hilmi Ismail
22 May 2012 10.12am

No, it’s not about the Bersih movement. It’s about the Bersih movement being hijacked by political desperados who wanted to create chaos and rioting and get world attention because they knew this was an excellent opportunity to ambarass the Malaysian Government, the Prime Minister,the Royal Malaysian Police Force, the Mayor of Kuala Lumpur and the Court. The scapegoats were the ‘innocent’ participants of the rally.
How come an academia could not see whereas an ordinary citizen like me could see the obvious.

Anti-propaganda
22 May 2012 3.30pm
Reply to  Hilmi Ismail

Your vision might be enhanced considerably if you remove your Umno blinkers.

That’s why Azmil’s insights are accepted by many but not yours.

kotor lah
kotor lah
19 May 2012 8.23pm

allowing millions illegals on our shores is good governance?? doesnt these millions posed any security risks??now tourists arriving in malaysia – need not fill embarkation forms- wah so generous from 1 JUNE 12?? why- whats the agenda lah?? 1 FUUNY malaysia