Penang’s FOI Bill “disgusting”

11
39

Selangor’s Freedom of Information Bill, being the country’s first, was understandably impaired. But what excuse has Penang to come up with the same paltry replica of Selangor’s FOI Bill, asks Sarajun Hoda Abdul Hassan.

The Selangor State Assembly debating the FOI Bill

The Penang government is inviting feedback on its proposal for a Freedom of Information (FOI) Bill. A closer scrutiny reveals that this enactment proposal is basically a carbon copy of the Selangor FOI Bill that was launched much earlier. The inconsequential changes in two or three sections are limited only to a different choice of words. Otherwise in essence, spirit and meaning, it is exactly the same. Not surprising because it must have come from the same ‘Gani Patail’ camp of thinking.

Like the Selangor FOI Bill, Penang’s FOI Bill is all too pretentious. It is poorly and purposely prepared to fail the state government’s desire for reform from the onset. Despite having access to some of the best legal minds in the country, the Penang Pakatan government did not think it fit to better prepare the Bill before putting it up to the people for their consideration. Appreciate that more than half Penang’s state assembly members from Pakatan are lawyers. Yet, coming with such a vague FOI Bill is not only disappointing but utterly disgusting.

As it is, my story published in Aliran Monthly, Vol.30, No. 9/2010, provided detailed feedback for the Selangor FOI Bill. Those comments stand for the corresponding sections of this Penang FOI Bill. It’s like peas in the same pod. That’s how identical it is, with all the same shortcomings.

READ MORE:  Raising maximum income threshold for eligibility does not make homes more affordable

Again, there is no seriousness by the Penang government to come out with a significantly different or better FOI enactment despite knowing that the Selangor government received loads of comments and input from civil society on its FOI Bill. The Penang government has also had enough time to consider some if not all the recommendations from civil society; yet it just didn’t bother to and superciliously went ahead to come up with almost a carbon copy of the same seriously deficient and flawed Selangor FOI.

Selangor’s FOI Bill, being the country’s first, was understandably impaired. But, what excuse has Penang to come up with the same paltry replica of Selangor’s FOI Bill? It is so very unlike Penang that has always prided itself on being a leader in bringing about reforms in Malaysia. After all, ‘Penang Leads’, right? Yet, this senseless and futile exercise by the state government either takes civil society organisations for fools or it just aims to hoodwink them into thinking that this FOI will put all necessary reforms pertinent to good governance in place while effectively using it as a delaying tactic until the next general election.

With such copious shortcomings, having or not having the FOI enactment makes little difference. With this FOI Bill, freedom of information will just not be forthcoming. For example, there is not a single section anywhere in the proposed enactment that suggests general information shall be freely made available to the public by the various state departments for the sake of good governance. This proactive and unambiguous assertion, which is essential in any FOI enactment, is conveniently and conspicuously missing.

READ MORE:  Reveal evicted Penang tenants' incomes to prove they are no longer in bottom 40%

Why does one need to ask for information? Why not simply post information in publications, public notices or even on official websites? Why does one have to give reasons for accessing any information? And if information can be given once, why not a second time? The information belongs to the people. The state government is merely a temporary caretaker. Why does the public have to pay for what it owns in the first place? Why cannot the public have access to information that belongs to them?

Why does the state government need 30 days to divulge information? In emergency cases, they need seven days. If one is in a fix, police custody for example, and needs information to prove one’s innocence, isn’t seven days too long? Beng Hock was killed even sooner. The most devastating Section 7(3) says, “…if there is no response within the stipulated time, it is deemed rejected.” So easy? And Section 8 says, “…information sought may be refused if the applicant is not entitled to it.” Who decides that?

The FOI Bill is surrounded by a million reasons stipulating why information ‘may’ not be given. Instead of asserting the opening up of access to information, it only speaks about conditions for not divulging information and even more excuses for impeding access. It finally sounds just as haughty, opaque and obfuscating as the Selangor Bill.

The Bill says that it ‘may’ give information, and not SHALL. It hides behind excuses such as “likely to prejudice relations” if disclosed; “likely to cause serious prejudice to state government policy formulations, developments, administration, economic developments, undermine a department, undermine an audit or test, or any documents it gazettes”. Information is also vaguely refused if the access to information interferes with the operation of the department, is deemed inappropriate, vexatious or unreasonable or for repeated application.

READ MORE:  Focus on Penang public transport, not highways, says expert

As well, the fact that appeal board members can be removed anytime without assigning any reason also means that the FOI Bill loses its credence, defeats its consequence, undermines its independence mandate and fails the confidence of the people. There is no separation of powers between the appeal board and the state government, which obviously wants to have it under its full and final control. Then again, the appeal does not work on the basis of the majority. The Chairman can make his unilateral decision and it cannot be challenged in any court. Sound familiar?

Then the guillotine falls down hard. If the information accessed is used for a different reason and purpose, it will invite a fine up to RM50,000 and/or a jail term not exceeding two years. Is this chilling effect not deliberately designed to discourage potential applicants from trying to get information? On the opposite scenario, if the State Official refuses to divulge information in his custody, what then is the punishment?

All in all, it is a kangaroo FOI Bill with a slippery skin of an eel.

Sarajun Hoda Abdul Hassan is an Aliran executive committee member

Thanks for dropping by! Apart from the views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed, the opinions in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation of whatever amount you can afford to sustain Aliran. Please make payments to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.

And why not become an Aliran member or subscribe to our FREE newsletters.

11
Join the conversation

avatar
750
8 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
adamcktehAgreeToDisagreeOng Eu SoonwthLeena Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
adamckteh
adamckteh

Mr. Sarajun Hoda Abdul Hassa, please tell Penang CAT what are the chenges are needed.The title of your article does not look friendly. Anyway please make
Peace!

Ong Eu Soon

Ask our president what is his stand on the FOI Bill, unquestioning support for LGe?

AgreeToDisagree

How about running in your constituency as an independent if you are not on either sides’ Oligarchs? There is a 3rd force being proposed made of KITA, MCLM, PCM, Borneo Front, Konsensus Bebas, HRP, PSM, PRS, PPP !

Though MCLM is very likely a dr.Evil controlled faction, it has it’s uses in displacing the Oligarchs of BN, lapdogs of BN, or Oligarchs of PR.

Then also try this group, I think some of the ideas there could appeal to your interest in city planning as well.

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_161380297228234&ap=1

wth
wth

He lost me halfway through the statement, with all that whining. After whinging and complaining, did the writer offer any constructive analysis? Big ‘No’. Sure sounds like someone with an axe to grind.

Leena
Leena

Penang’s Pakatan Government is just as (unaccountable) as BN ever was. The only difference is, they’re better at hiding it. I’m starting to lose faith in Pakatan as we speak

AgreeToDisagree

Aliran, still not too late to slam DAP about the 0.002% quorum EXCO Elections or PKR for the 8.4% quorum part Elections. Show some objectivity on these 2 failures of democracy please! 66.6% quorum MINIMUM. If they are no disciplined or diligent enough, then we cannot trust them at all! Given Pakatan’s propensity for Oligarchy as well, it is unforgivable for Aliran to say nothing!

Aliran’s ‘Elegant Silence’ on these 2 matters grows increasingly DEAFENING on every issue you cover without slamming these 2! Tacit approval of undemocratic practices, whitewash and a non-neutral favouring of Pakatan if anything. Aliran is supposed to be neutral, so be neutral and state facts as they are!

KBP1
KBP1

Freedom apa?

Si LGE takut nak release minutes pasal Kampung Buah Pala.

Ang Wee Kiong
Ang Wee Kiong

I fully agree that the Penang FOI is NO FOI as what is said by the above writer.

Free means to be on displayed in the public domain adn why so many hindrances and so many ridiculous requirements to access information.

LGE and others in the Penang legislature, do yourselves a favour, don’t take us for fools.

If you want to be different and better than BN, take on different souls, not just change your clothes.

AgreeToDisagree

We don’t have to complain from the sidelines and if you want change, run for candidacy. Nothing to lose face about. It is your democratic right after all. Take up this FOI (also quorumless EXCO or even malicious compliance against refusal to amend laws issue) as a campaiging purpose, and run for candidacy! All MP or Assemblyman’s seats are up for grabs in all elections.

Yap P L

The person seeking information from Government must seek it publicly and the information given must be fully available to the public.Therefore there be a public website and a daily newspaper for the purpose. In this way private prejudice and personal advantage can be avoided and Government can be fair to all and more open.