Chew Zhun Yee
Recently, a theatre performance by The Fever Kinetic, first staged in 2018, resurfaced online and spread widely. Its makers called it a satirical take on the Rukun Negara (national principles).
In a strikingly different setting, on many Monday mornings, schoolchildren in Malaysia stand in neat rows, hand on chest, and recite the five principles almost automatically.
One turns the national pillars into a satirical commentary. The other repeats them as a ritual.
Between the two lies a pertinent question: how much do we actually understand about the Rukun Negara?
Common misunderstandings
A common misconception concerns the first principle, ‘kepercayaan kepada Tuhan’ (belief in God). Some misread it as a declaration that Malaysia is a theocratic state, or that everyone in Malaysia must hold religious beliefs.
The historical context helps. The principle was formulated in the aftermath of the 13 May 1969 riots. Beyond reflecting the religious beliefs of the majority, it can also be understood as an attempt to establish a common moral foundation for social cohesion.
- Sign up for Aliran's free daily email updates or weekly newsletters or both
- Make a one-off donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara (ALIRAN), Maybank a/c 507246118995 or CIMB a/c 8004240948
- Make a regular pledge or periodic auto-donation to Aliran
- Become an Aliran member
The preamble and the official elaboration in the original Rukun Negara book also emphasise “a liberal approach to her rich and diverse cultural tradition”. This highlights the coexistence of groups regardless of their religious beliefs and the importance of respecting freedom of religion.
Some worry that a “liberal” attitude means a thick, individualist form of liberalism associated with Western societies. This is often seen as conflicting with traditional values.
But in Malaysia’s context, liberal need not mean unencumbered individual autonomy set against the community. We should distinguish being liberal in attitude from subscribing to a particular philosophical doctrine of liberalism.
The preamble uses the former sense: an openness towards the plurality of traditions that make up society in Malaysia. National Unity Minister Aaron Ago Dagang has also clarified this.
Another common misunderstanding is that the Rukun Negara undermines the special rights of the bumiputras. Its official elaboration, under the section on “Just Society”, states that “all members have equal opportunity to enjoy the material well-being afforded by the Nation” and that “it is necessary that the weak and the disadvantaged be assisted to enable them to compete on equal terms”.
This conception of justice resonates with the philosopher John Rawls’ idea of the “original position” in A Theory of Justice. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim also highlighted Rawls in his Budget 2027 speech.
Rawls argues that principles of justice should be chosen from behind a “veil of ignorance”, where people do not know their own race, class, talents or social position. From this view, inequalities are allowed only when they benefit the least advantaged in society.
However, legal scholar Prof Shad Saleem Faruqi has explained that the emphasis on ‘keluhuran Perlembagaan’ (supremacy of the Constitution) means accepting the Constitution as a whole. That includes bumiputra special privileges and the legitimate interests of other communities.
So, distributive justice for society as a whole need not come at the expense of corrective justice for a particular community.
Next, the fifth principle, ‘Kesopanan dan kesusilaan’ (courtesy and morality), is more than good manners and conduct. It includes moral responsibility and respect towards others.
The official elaboration states that “no citizen should question the loyalty of another citizen on the ground that he belongs to a particular community”.
Finally, in a BFM podcast, poet and writer Eddin Khoo discussed the history and philosophy of the Rukun Negara. He noted it was conceived not merely as a national ideology, but also as a national philosophy intended to encourage contemplation and dialogue.
Ritual without reflection
Unfortunately, for many people in Malaysia, the Rukun Negara has become a ritual of patriotism with little reflection on its meaning or relevance to our lives. This can widen the gap between its principles and their practice.
The rise in school bullying cases raises questions about how well we have internalised the fifth principle.
Beyond schools, the persistence of corruption, cronyism and religious intolerance sits uneasily with the fourth and fifth principles, ‘kedaulatan undang-undang’ (rule of law) and ‘kesopanan dan kesusilaan’.
Fearmongering and zero-sum racial rhetoric also run counter to the fifth principle.
Such rhetoric frames specific groups as under threat or questions the national belonging of others. As discussed above, the principle should be seen as an ethical commitment to mutual recognition and equal civic standing.
Such rhetoric is also inconsistent with the Rukun Negara’s aspiration to preserve a “democratic way of life” and achieve “a more perfect unity amongst the whole of her society”, in which the interests of the nation as a whole should take precedence over sectional interests.
Of course, the Rukun Negara alone cannot prevent bullying. Nor should every social problem be blamed on a failure to uphold its principles.
But these issues invite us to reflect on our approach to moral and civic education. Does it place too much emphasis on rote learning – what the educationist and philosopher Paulo Freire called a “banking” model of learning? And does it do too little to cultivate critical thinking, moral judgement and a sense of responsibility towards others?
Reviving the conversation
Malaysia needs more public education that promotes contemplation and dialogue about the Rukun Negara. Schools could use discussions, case studies and debates that invite students to examine what each principle means and how to apply it.
Dialogue should also go beyond schools. It should happen horizontally, between different social groups, and vertically, between those who govern and those who are governed. The aim is to deliberate on the Rukun Negara’s fundamental concepts and how to understand them in an evolving, plural nation.
Public forums can help. The Malaysian Philosophy Society’s Think Big Summit 2026: The Malaysian Dilemma, for example, aims to encourage ordinary people to examine the meaning of the Rukun Negara beyond its ritual recitation. Its session is called ‘The Rukun Negara: More than just Monday morning assembly’.
Only then can the Rukun Negara become a living philosophy that is continuously discussed and appreciated, rather than a theatrical backdrop – familiar, but increasingly invisible.
Chew Zhun Yee is the co-founder of the Malaysian Philosophy Society.
The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.
- Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
- Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
- Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
- Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
- Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
