Initiation of contempt proceedings against lawyer acting for his clients is a travesty of justice

A lawyer should not be deprived of his right to prepare for a trial

It has come to Aliran’s attention that lawyer Charles Hector and eight of his clients are facing legal action for possible contempt of court.

Hector is acting as the lawyer for eight defendants who are part of communities that have been protesting against logging in the forests in the vicinity of where they live and work. 

The plaintiffs are logging contractors who are appointees of the logging licence holder, Pengurus Besar Yayasan Pahang, a Pahang state statutory body. [Though the licence has been awarded to this body, approval to start logging has not yet been given.]

As part of the defence’s trial preparations, Hector had sent a letter on behalf of his clients, seeking clarification from a person, who is also a civil servant, over certain disputed facts contained in a letter that the latter had previously issued.

The plaintiffs are now alleging that Hector’s letter is in breach of an interim injunction/court order they had obtained in November 2020. This has resulted in a hearing for ‘leave of court’ to initiate contempt proceedings against Hector and the eight defendants scheduled for 25 March 2021 at the Kuantan High Court.

This initiation of contempt proceedings against Hector and the eight defendants is extremely worrying and can be seen as a travesty of justice.

Silencing a lawyer through contempt proceedings is essentially preventing the lawyer from carrying out his professional duty to his clients.

Aliran calls for the upholding of the rights of litigants to a fair trial. A lawyer should not be deprived of his right to prepare for a trial, including obtaining all the salient facts to argue his case in court. The defendants should not be denied their right to a counsel of their choice.

READ MORE:  Malaysia deports 1,086 Myanmar nationals despite court order
Aliran executive committee
16 March 2021
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Angeline Loh
Angeline Loh
17 Mar 2021 3.40pm

… the basic principles of justice? That both parties to a litigation must have a fair opportunity to prepare their cases with the best evidence they can adduce.

loyal malaysian
loyal malaysian
17 Mar 2021 5.48am

Charles Hector is a lawyer and I am sure he knows where he stands viz a viz the case he is defending.

Yet, as Aliran pointed out, “This initiation of contempt proceedings…is extremely worrying and can be seen as a travesty of justice.”
Aliran has voiced other concerns which I agree totally but lest we forget Yayasan Pahang has powerful supporters.

I can but wish Charles will meet one of those rare gems still to be found in our judiciary!!