Conditional approval for Penang’s Pan Island Link highway unacceptable

Are more highways the way forward for Penang?

Aliran is utterly shocked and disappointed over the granting of a conditional approval for the environmental impact assessment report for the proposed Pan Island Link highway in Penang.

The Department of Environment approved the report with 56 conditions despite numerous shortcomings highlighted by civil society groups and concerned individuals.

The proposed six-lane highway will be one of the most expensive highways around on a per kilometre basis. Reported estimates for the total cost range from RM7.5bn to RM9.6bn for the 19.5km route, which works out to RM385m-RM492m per kilometre.

The mind boggles at the land deals that will be involved in financing this highway (as well as the equally expensive elevated light rail transit system).

Apart from the exorbitant cost, the PIL will be environmentally disastrous. No amount of “conditions” can mitigate for the damage it will inflict on the island.

The highway construction involves blasting on sensitive hill slopes to create four stretches of tunnels totalling 10.2km. The tunnels will pass through fault lines and come close to the Air Itam Dam. Unfortunately, Penang’s record of monitoring projects along hill slopes has been less than inspiring.

The highway will also degrade two immensely popular parks in Penang – the Penang Youth Park and the Sungai Ara Linear Park.

The chief minister has described the conditional approval as a major milestone in addressing the traffic problem. But highways are never a long-term solution for traffic congestion. The reprieve from congestion will only be temporary and traffic jams will return in five to seven years.

READ MORE:  You want more land? Scrap Penang South Reclamation; Batu Kawan is your friend

Aliran cannot fathom the short-sightedness of the state government over this project. Under the original Halcrow masterplan strategy, the same amount of money to be spent on the Pan Island Link could have been used to create a public transport network for the entire state.

So what is driving such unwise decision-making? Who will bear responsibility for any major disasters, environmental degradation, cost overruns and construction accidents arising from this project?

In the long run, it is the people of Penang and future generations who will bear the brunt of this disastrous decision.

Aliran reiterates its call to the Penang state government to not proceed with this highway project.

Aliran executive committee

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
21 Apr 2019 9.41am

Not totally agreed with the editor on this particular issue as every nation and OR states needs certain extent of progression and development particularly on matter arising from any form of mitigation. Imagine the massive traffic congestion that create pollution and noise impact to the environment if not well planned ahead. One must look into the entire analysis of the issue at the macro level not just by seeing it on micro scale.

Ravinder Singh
17 Apr 2019 6.27pm

This is the developers’ project for their gains and the state government is just the facilitator helping them to push the project through in the name of “development”. How “independent” were the experts who prepared the EIA? If they were paid by the developers / contractors who will be benefiting from the projects, then the EIA is unacceptable as it would have been skewed to favour them.

Vote victim
Vote victim
21 Apr 2019 8.31am
Reply to  Ravinder Singh

Yes indeed! While the new government shows crocodile tears to tge public over the debts left behind by the previous government!

I wonder if the new party ruling this government or the ex Umno authorities ruling this government. They cry baby for every issues including the opportunities for straight “A” students. What a shame!