Censorship under the guise of action against ‘fake news’

1
257
Photograph: Canva

Some fake information related to the coronavirus pandemic has been circulating through the media, including social media, at a time when the people need accurate information to calm their nerves.

This is why the government is concerned that such information could create more anxiety, panic and confusion among the people – which is the last thing we want now.

Aliran appreciates that the government is taking measures to curb distorted information. But we are troubled by the way it proposes to overcome this problem, which can eventually lead to the undemocratic practice of censoring fair and critical comments.

We now learn that the official definition of “fake news” has been widened to even criminalise legitimate criticisms of the government and its policies.

We take issue especially with the government’s attempt to punish those whose criticisms are deemed to have caused “distrust in the ruling government”.

When a government, more so one that is deemed by many as a “backdoor government”, makes a conflicting decision that causes confusion and unnecessary inconvenience, it stands the risk of earning the distrust of the rakyat.

The recent government ruling to allow barbers to operate is a case in point. Would critics and barbers’ associations, which are concerned with the physical proximity between barbers and clients, be hauled up by the police and the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission?

Similarly, would concerned Malaysians be blamed if they called out ministers whose behaviour only invited brickbats, such as in the Doraemon, TikTok and warm water remedy cases?

In defining “fake news”, the government warns against news and comments that could “lower the reputation of an individual, organisation and country”. So what do we do with the ministers of Doraemon, TikTok and warm-water fame who have done a splendid job of lowering not only their professional reputations but also the government’s and the nation’s. Think of how their antics have turned us into the laughing stock of the world.

The government could deal with any fake news or information by quickly coming out with clarifications that could be disseminated to news portals and over social media.

Resorting to censorship, especially in its extreme form, in a time of crisis reflects the insecurity of the government of the day.

READ MORE:  WHO's emergency funding needs global rethink

Rather we should be upholding public scrutiny and the democratic checks and balances, including over the media, during this difficult period.

Aliran executive committee

12 April 2020

Sign Aliran's 'Save our Democracy" petition
Sign Aliran's petition calling for a review of the decision to grant Riza Aziz a DNAA
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gram Massla
Gram Massla
13 Apr 2020 10.40pm

Controlling the flow of information has been the pastime of the Ulema, the Church and the Brahmin, in centuries past. At the present time the kingpin in the attempt to control the flow of information is the CCP. In the West certain groups attempt to fashion the agenda by concentrating the media in their hands to protect the interests of Israel, for example. In the US the First Amendment to the Constitution, which guarantees the freedom of speech, is under relentless assault from groups who attempt to define what is unacceptable speech. The concept of free speech is incomprehensible to many societies such as Malaysia. As such the onus of keeping the spirit of freedom alive, as embodied in free speech, is on the shoulders of civic groups.