Sarawak polls: It’s not rule of law – not even rule by law!

1
779

The sad thing about the Sarawak election is that it does not fit into the democratic mode at all.

It is an election that does not give the Opposition any chance to contest on equal footing. It is so unfair that it can be compared to a boxer being thrown into the boxing ring with his hands tied.

Sarawak covers a huge tract of land that is inaccessible without large resources and facilities – a great handicap for the Opposition. A huge team of party workers is required to spread out and reach remote villages to bring to them a party’s point of view on political matters. It takes much effort and time to cover this huge tract of land to win over voters in remote areas.

This makes it doubly hard for opposition parties when they lack resources to penetrate these inaccessible areas to bring home the message of change. This is made even harder by the Barisan Nasional, which takes every step to unfairly put obstacles in their way to deny the opposition parties their legitimate right to campaign effectively.

When leaders of the opposition parties are barred from Sarawak without any reason whereas BN leaders are allowed free access to campaign in Sarawak, one is left baffled as to how lopsided the Sarawak election has become. It is atrociously outrageous.

We hear accusations that opposition leaders from the Peninsula would control Sarawak if the Opposition won. We wonder how this would be possible when only Sarawakians are contesting in the elections. No one from the Peninsula is contesting in this election. How then could opposition leaders from the Peninsula control Sarawak? This is an absurd accusation by people who have lost their thinking faculties.

READ MORE:  Protect Sarawak's forests to protect our health

Going by the same logic, can we then claim that BN leaders from the Peninsula would be controlling Sarawak because these leaders are busily campaigning in Sarawak as well? That would be stupid.

The prime minister and his entire cabinet have descended on Sarawak and are spreading out all over Sarawak using various convenient transportation facilities at their disposal and promising projects and incentives to woo the voters. This is akin to bribing.

When you prevent the opposition leaders from conducting legitimate political activities during the election period by banning them from Sarawak, you are reducing their campaign personnel and their ability to campaign effectively. Thus the Sarawak Opposition is rendered ineffective and their influence is deliberately diminished so that they cannot do well in the election. This is contrary to the rule of law.

Immigration laws allow opposition leaders to enter Sarawak “for the sole purpose of engaging in legitimate political activity”. But when this provision is totally ignored, it means even the rule by law is discarded. There is no rule of law; neither is there rule by law. The Sarawak government under Adenan Satem has no moral authority to exercise any legitimate power to prevent the Opposition equal access to Sarawak.

It is a commonly accepted notion that a caretaker chief minister does not have the power to ban opposition leaders, who have a right to be in Sarawak during this campaign period. He can only attend to the day-to-day affairs and cannot initiate new projects or approve allocations for whatever reason or purpose. But this simple moral obligation has not been observed by the chief minister of Sarawak.

READ MORE:  Preserving the spirit of MA 1963 in the new cabinet?

Sarawak voters must never tolerate this blatant abuse of power. If the right of political leaders can be denied so blatantly, it only means that the right of ordinary Sarawakians can also be denied any time after the election.

To safeguard your rights, “Never be a spectator to unfairness or stupidity.”

P Ramakrishnan
Aliran executive commitee member
3 May 2016

Sign Aliran's 'Save our Democracy" petition
Sign Aliran's petition calling for a review of the decision to grant Riza Aziz a DNAA
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stephen Tan Ban Cheng
Stephen Tan Ban Cheng
5 May 2016 3.56pm

Chief Minister Adenan Satem is a lawyer and, a fortiori, he will be imputed with the knowledge that the immigration ban he imposed by administrative fiat cannot withstand juridicial scrutiny by any competent Court of law. Why? They call it Wednesbury unreasonableness.

It is incumbent on any and all of the self-respecting political parties involved to seek a judicial declaration on the administrative powers of the Sarawak Chief Minister on immigration of West Malaysians.

Of course, I am assuming that these political parties are led by leaders who are self-respecting!