Set up IPCMC immediately: EAIC unable to probe deaths in custody or guarantee justice

2

Minister Paul Low must learn the facts about the EAIC to which he has urged the family of death in custody victim N Dharmendran to lodge a report, says Francis Loh.

Minister Paul Low
Minister Paul Low

Paul Low, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, has urged the family of custodial death victim N Dharmendran – who died on 21 May – to lodge a report with the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC) so that an independent probe can commence.

For this new Minister, there is no need for the formation of an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) as there is already an exisiting mechanism, namely the EAIC.

We strongly disagree with the new Minister’s opinion.

With the Bar Council and other civil society groups, Aliran calls for the immediate establishment of an IPCMC. Respected citizens including retired judges, officials, religious leaders and members of human rights NGOs should be invited to sit on this body.

Indeed, the establishement of the IPCPM was recommended in the Report of the Royal Commission to Enhance the Operation and Management of the Royal Malaysia Police, which was first released on 16 May 2005. Instead of implementing the recommendations of the Royal Commission, the BN government decided to set up a task force to study the recommendations in the Report.

In the process, the most important recommendation of the Royal Commission, namely the setting up of the IPCMC was set aside. Greater attention was given to launching a nationwide drive against crime, modernising the Police force, improving the system of remuneration, upgrading equipment and logistics.

READ MORE:  Is the IPCMC Bill unfair to the police?

Instead of the IPCMC, the task force ultimately recommended the establishment of the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC). What is this EAIC? The new Minister needs to familiarise himself with the workings of the EAIC.

And if Paul Low does not want to listen to the Bar Council and other civil society groups, he ought to listen to what the former Chief Justice Abdul Hamid Mohamad has said. Indeed, in a recent forum on the Integrity of the EAIC, some very important and relevant information pertaining to the functioning and effectiveness of the EAIC was revealed by the former Chief Justice.

Established in September 2011 under the provision of the EAIC Act 2009, a total of 19 enforcement agencies, including the Police, fall under the purview of the EAIC. With the exception of corruption cases, the EAIC is required to handle or investigate all other complaints even if it falls under the Penal Code.

The former CJ revealed that the EAIC had only six investigators appointed since September 2011 (but that there remained only a single investigator since May 16!).

Indeed, from September 2011 until the end of 2012, the EAIC had received a total of 347 complaints and after preliminary investigations, 110 were rejected, nine were referred to the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission (MACC), 15 were referred to appropriate disciplinary authorities, four were referred to appropriate disciplinary authorities and MACC; 60 or 17.2 percent were directed for full investigation and 149 required further preliminary investigation.

Under the Act, task forces should be established to investigate these 60 complaints referred for full investigations, Abdul Hamid revealed. Yet ”the Commission has not established any task force on these complaints’, he said.

READ MORE:  Aliran calls on police to respect people’s constitutional rights 

“So far, full investigations were done on [only] three cases, and from these three, only one has been referred to the disciplinary authority of the police while the [other] two cases were closed due to double jeopardy as the complaint had been heard and punished by the appropriate enforcement agency, namely Rela and the Road Transport Department.

Yet the EAIC is supposed to handle complaints whether of a disciplinary or criminal nature involving some 160,000 (enforcement) personnel. Should the public decide not to lodge police reports but channel their complaints to the EAIC, it would be impossible for the EAIC handle all these complaints?

The Minister, we humbly submit, must learn the facts about the EAIC to which he has urged the family of death in custody victim N Dharmendran to lodge a report. We also submit that death in custody cases should not be mixed with complaints against Rela, RTD, Bomba, etc

Dr Francis Loh
President, Aliran
8 June 2013

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rumi
Rumi
11 Jun 2013 11.40pm

The word Independent puts the fear of the devil in them.

Lynn Cheang
Lynn Cheang
9 Jun 2013 7.31pm

Good rebuttal to the new minister. Perhaps he’s not aware of how the govt bureaucracy works.