Protestors’ hot air gets more media coverage

0
20

It is good for all Malaysians that the Article 11-Bar Council forum held in Johor Baru on 22 July did not end up with any “ugly” scenes despite a strong protest mounted against it – so unlike what happened on 14 May in Penang, where protestors managed to disrupt a perfectly legal forum.

The police in JB appeared well prepared to do their job this time, and, by all media accounts, they acted professionally, even admirably, in protecting the forum organisers’ legal right to carry out the forum amidst the very tense situation stirred by the protestors who had assembled outside.  Kudos to the police, for what they did amounted to an illustration of democracy in action. 

On the other hand, media coverage was somewhat confusing and a letdown.

The JB forum started at 9 am (as scheduled) and ended at around 11:15 am, instead of 1 pm as scheduled.  Malaysiakini and The Star did not think it unusual because the organisers were apparently not being pressured to cut short the forum.  Even though the police told them about the tense atmosphere outside the forum venue, the organisers said that all the speakers made their presentations and fielded questions during the Q&A before the forum ended slightly less than two hours ahead of schedule.

The New Straits Times, however, offered something else.  Under the headline “Article 11 forum disrupted again,” the first paragraph of its report states:

A forum organised by the Article 11 Coalition here yesterday was cut short on the advice of the police as some 400 demonstrators gathered outside the forum venue.

The report went on to say that forum chairman Ramdas Tikamdas took the police advice as a “friendly recommendation”. He also added that before the forum ended, it managed to include the presentations of all the speakers as well as a Q&A session.  Well, if so, how then was the forum “disrupted”?

READ MORE:  Covid-19 not an excuse to restrict media coverage of Parliament

As to what was chosen for coverage, all the media (including Malaysiakini) were a letdown.  They focused on only what went on outside the forum venue.  Hardly anything was reported on what was said or discussed inside. 

The media were of course right to cover the protest and how the police handled it.  But, surely, they should also have reported on the key points brought up by the 200-odd participants of the forum.  Could it be that they didn’t have reporters inside the venue to follow the proceedings?

It could thus be argued that the protestors succeeded in creating another “disruption”.  This time, their presence somehow prevented the media from reporting what was said at the forum to the wider public. The media are solely to be blamed here.  They were drawn to the dramatic or sensational story and lost sight of the essense of the forum itself and what it was all about.  What a shame.

 

Sign Aliran's 'Save our Democracy" petition
Sign Aliran's petition calling for a review of the decision to grant Riza Aziz a DNAA
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments