In finding Major Zaidi guilty and dismissing him from his job, military court has cost Malaysia a fine soldier

3
Major Zaidi Ahmad

The Coalition for Free and Fair Election (Bersih 2.0) is extremely disappointed with the guilty verdict delivered to Major Zaidi Ahmad by the military court today.

Major Zaidi Ahmad
Major Zaidi Ahmad

The sentence meted out to him – dismissal from His Majesty’s service – effectively ends Major Zaidi’s 26-year-and-one-day career with the military that could have gone further, based on his impeccable record thus far.

Bersih 2.0 knows how committed Major Zaidi is as a citizen, a family man, and a soldier. It is precisely because of his personal, professional and societal commitment that he lodged a police report over the failure of the indelible ink during early voting in the 13th general election.

Major Zaidi has explained his actions: He did not want the process to be similarly marred on the actual voting day. He also wanted to protect the military’s image from being tarred alongside that of the Election Commission – because, to him, keeping silent would be complicit to the farce being perpetuated on the people.

Unfortunately, despite his valiant efforts, no action has been taken on the Election Commission till this very day, and no one from the Election Commission has ever had to account for this sham. Nothing has ever come from the hundreds of police reports lodged against the Election Commission over this except for this particular one, which resulted in punishment for the whistleblower instead of the wrongdoer.

Major Zaidi has played his role as a citizen to highlight the biggest scandal among the irregularities that marred the 13th general election. For that, he has paid a heavy price, while Malaysia, too, has lost a fine soldier today.

Bersih 2.0 is also disappointed the court did not wait for the judicial review challenging the convening authority’s decision to proceed, despite a complaint from the defence that the fairness and integrity of the proceedings may have been compromised. We now look to the judicial review, the leave of application for which will be heard on 5 February at the KL High Court, for some measure of justice for Major Zaidi.

Steering Committee of Bersih 2.0,

which comprises:

Chairperson: Maria Chin Abdullah; Deputy Chairperson: Sarajun Hoda Abdul Hassan; Treasurer: Masjaliza Hamzah; national representatives: Prof Madya Dr Abdul Halim bin Yusoff, Farhana binti Abdul Halim, Fadiah Nadwa Fikri and New Sin Yew; vice-chairpersons: Jannie Lasimbang (Sabah), Ahmad b Awang Ali (Sarawak), Abd Halim b Wan Ismail (East Peninsula), Thomas Fann (South Peninsula), Simon Lee Ying Wai (Central Peninsula) and Dato’ Dr Toh Kin Woon (North Peninsula)

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nalla Alagan
14 Jan 2015 2.24pm

A real soldier.

ARH
ARH
13 Jan 2015 2.52pm

We can’t have the rule of law if people can choose which laws to apply
based on their point of view, and this is why laws ought to be reasonable
and fair, and neither the people nor the authority should breach their trust.

For all his good and sincere intention and standing up to his role as a good
and responsible citizen this is what Maj. Zaidi gets in return. So the mud
simply has to be ‘made’ to stict to the accused, otherwise the case against him would fall apart through lack of bone fide evidence.

We are, of course, aware of the fact that it is an impossible task to desist
from allowing bias to creep into the analysis of the facts. Hence judgment
can possibly become impaired and justice clouded cant’t be ruled out.

This is the state of our society where just about anything goes and nothing
is certain and that our legal systems seem to exchange victims’ rights for
criminal rights and allow misguided compassion to nullify judgment. This is our perception. Very sad indeed.

Robert R Samuel
13 Jan 2015 1.01am

A True Malaysian Patriot.