Stop use of repressive laws in addressing temple dispute

3
89
Aftermath of the attack on the Seafield Sri Maha Mariamman Devasrhanam temple. — Photograph: Asyraf Rasid/The Sun Daily

Hakam notes with deep concern the cabinet’s decision yesterday to withdraw the moratorium on the Prevention of Crime Act, the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2015, the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012, the Sedition Act 1948 and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 in order for the police to probe recent events surrounding the Sri Maha Mariamman Temple at USJ 25, Subang Jaya.

Hakam fully supports the government’s intention to restore peace and public order and for those who incite racial hatred and rioting to be punished under the law.

The current government, however, must not emulate the previous administration in using repressive laws to deal with this situation. It was for this reason that Pakatan Harapan’s manifesto promised to abolish these laws. The continued use of these obnoxious laws violates the integrity and credibility of building a new Malaysia distinct from the old.

Hakam calls on the government to immediately repudiate its decision to use these repressive laws against suspects. There are sufficient provisions in our laws to deal with this situation.

In particular, the Prevention of Crime Act and the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act give wide powers to the authorities to detain an individual for prolonged periods without trial and provides no judicial oversight.

READ MORE:  No more excuses; moratorium against draconian laws immediately

Hakam believes that the existing provisions for remand of up to 14 days under the Criminal Procedure Code and the channelling of more resources to the relevant agencies for speedier investigations are adequate measures to tackle the problem at hand.

Further, the Sedition Act 1948 and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act are phrased too arbitrarily & have been opened to abuse many times under the previous regime.

Hakam believes there are existing provisions in the Penal Code to prosecute offenders in these cases, such as Section 298 (uttering words, etc, with deliberate intent to wound the religious feelings of any person), Section 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke a breach of the peace) and Section 505 (statements conducing to public mischief).

Finally, the usage of the Prevention of Terrorism Act is wholly unnecessary considering that the temple fracas has no relation to terrorism.

Hakam therefore urges the government to stand firm with its manifesto promises, respect human rights and uphold the rule of law. Public order and human rights can exist hand-in-hand – and this government must prove that this is the way for Malaysia to move forward.

Lim Wei Jiet is secretary-general of Hakam.

Thanks for dropping by! Apart from the views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed, the opinions in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation of whatever amount you can afford to sustain Aliran. Please make payments to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.

And why not become an Aliran member or subscribe to our FREE newsletters.

3
Join the conversation

avatar
750
3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
Cheah ChachacheahKevin DhillonSkylar Hii Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Kevin Dhillon

They simply can’t. They don’t have the political will nor guts to handle this any other way

Cheah Chachacheah

Depends on who you are dealing with. Can’t expect to be serenading a pack of …. 😁

Skylar Hii

In order to maintain the Spread of hatred/ racial discrimination, intentionally/ unintentionally, these laws r needed de. Is the same as telling our kids to complete their HWs. Kids nowadays, dun see cane, wont move at all. The cane acts as the laws.