Rights betrayed: Malaysia’s government fails to comply with UN council’s recommendations

The UN Human Rights Council - geneva.usmission.gov

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

Civicus, Suaram, the Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ), Forum-Asia and Article 19 are concerned that the Malaysian government has failed to accept recommendations made at the UN’s Human Rights Council to respect and protect civic freedoms, particularly freedom of expression and freedom of assembly.

These actions are inconsistent with the government’s commitments to undertake human rights reforms and call into question Malaysia’s credibility as a member of the UN Human Rights Council.

In February 2024, Malaysia’s human rights record was reviewed by the council during its Universal Periodic Review.

A total of 348 recommendations were issued, including on respect for civic freedoms. Among the recommendations made were to ratify human rights treaties, repeal restrictive laws and ensure the protection of human rights defenders. The adoption of the outcome report was scheduled for 5 July in Geneva.

During its last review in 2018, the Malaysian government accepted recommendations to sign and ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, a core human rights treaty ratified by 174 countries globally.

However, the government appears to have backtracked on this commitment by failing to accept recommendations to do so, making the country an outlier on this key treaty.

Our organisations are concerned that the government failed to accept any recommendations to review or repeal laws that curtail freedom of expression, such as the Sedition Act 1948, Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (CMA) and the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 (PPPA).

Since the Anwar Ibrahim government came to power, our organisations have documented how the state has continued using these laws to criminalise human rights defenders, the opposition and critics.

READ MORE:  NGOs cautiously optimistic about Malaysia's new human rights pledges

The CMA in particular is one of the most significant threats to freedom of expression in Malaysia. It has been used to criminalise online expression and block social media posts, critical websites and blogs.

The authorities routinely abuse the colonial-era Sedition Act to stifle dissent, as highlighted by the recent investigation of youth activist Mukmin Nantang for his peaceful advocacy for the rights of the Bajau Laut people, an indigenous community in East Malaysia. Notably, this is the first time the sedition law has been used to target a human rights defender under the current government.

The PPPA has been used to raid bookstores like Toko Rakyat in August 2023 and ban books. The government is also mulling over expanding the scope of the PPPA to regulate digital media, which could severely threaten media freedom and freedom of expression for online content publishers.

At the same time, progress has been slow on the promised enactment of right-to-information legislation and the establishment of a Malaysian media ouncil.

The government also did not accept recommendations to revise the Peaceful Assembly Act, which is discriminatory and has been used to restrict and criminalise protests. The law criminalises anyone who organises an assembly without giving the required notice five days in advance, and lacks an exception to the notice requirement for spontaneous assemblies. It also makes it a criminal offence for people under 21 years old to organise an assembly and for children to attend an assembly. Further, non-citizens are also denied the right to organise or participate in protests, which is discriminatory.

READ MORE:  Repressive laws persist in Malaysia despite pre-election promises

Over the last two years, the government has continued to harass protesters for organising and participating in peaceful protests. The police have systematically called activists for questioning before and after the assemblies, including for protests in support of women’s rights, labour rights and land rights, protests in solidarity with the Palestinians, as well as those critical of the government.

Additionally, the state failed to accept recommendations to protect human rights defenders – who continue to face arrests, harassment, threats and online violence. Land rights activist Chong Yee Shan is on trial for blocking a forced eviction of farmers in October 2023, where she was assaulted by a government official. At the same time, no one has been held accountable for the threat on the life of lawyer and human rights defender Siti Kassim after a bomb was found under her car in July 2023.

We urge the Malaysian government, as a UN Human Rights Council member, to review its regressive decision not to accept the Universal Periodic Review recommendations on civic freedoms and to take its role seriously.

The government can start by ratifying core treaties, especially the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and to immediately review and abolish restrictive laws that silence dissent.

We also urge the government to create an enabling environment for civil society and human rights defenders to carry out their fundamental work to promote and protect human rights. – Civicus/Suaram/CIJ/Forum-Asia/Article 19

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.
AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support Aliran's work with an online donation. Scan this QR code using your mobile phone e-wallet or banking app:
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments