Our addiction to fossil fuels causes climate emergency, say human rights experts

2
54

UN human rights experts have called for an end to society’s addiction to fossil fuels ahead of the Climate Action Summit in New York on 23 September 2019.

They have issued the following statement:

Burning coal, oil, and gas produce the vast majority of human-caused greenhouse gas emissions, resulting in the global climate emergency that endangers human rights in every region of the planet.

Twenty-seven years after all states committed to tackling the challenge of climate change through the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the share of the world’s energy provided by fossil fuels remains unchanged at 81%.

Since 1990, global energy consumption has grown 57%, with coal consumption up 68%, oil use up 36% and natural gas use up 82%.

Climate change is already causing increased frequency, intensity and duration of extreme weather events, melting of glaciers and ice sheets, rising sea levels, storm surges, saltwater intrusion, ocean acidification, changes in precipitation, flooding, heatwaves, droughts, wildfires, increased air pollution, desertification, water shortages, the destruction of ecosystems, biodiversity loss and the spread of water-borne and vector-borne disease.

Among the human rights being threatened and violated by climate change are the rights to life, health, food, water and sanitation, a healthy environment, an adequate standard of living, housing, property, self-determination, development and culture.

While fossil fuels have made an enormous contribution to economic prosperity, the environmental and social costs of their use are staggering. Millions of people die prematurely each year because of air pollution, while billions of people are adversely affected by the Earth’s changing climate.

READ MORE:  The insecure future: Food and climate crisis

In its latest report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated that “limiting global warming to 1.5°C would require rapid, far-reaching, and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society”.

To meet the 1.5°C target set by the Paris Agreement and limit the damage to human rights, urgent and effective actions must be implemented immediately to:

  • reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 45% by 2030
  • phase out unabated fossil fuel burning by the middle of the century, and
  • reverse deforestation

In addition, indigenous peoples’ knowledge may prove essential to curb the effects of climate change: their ancestral knowledge and leadership, which have maintained many of humanity’s forests, biodiversity and other resources, must be preserved.

It is therefore that crucial indigenous peoples’ rights be protected, including their right to freely and fully participate in shaping policy decisions, in particular regarding hydroelectric, wind or other projects which may be developed on their traditional homelands with the goal of reducing fossil fuels.

To empower and protect vulnerable populations requires mobilising at least $100bn (RM417bn) in annual adaptation funding to assist low-income countries, and establishing a new fund, financed by an air passenger travel levy, to support small- island developing states and least developed countries in addressing loss and damage caused by climate change.

Wealthy countries and other large emitters must lead these efforts and provide the majority of the requisite financing.

Meeting the Paris Agreement target of 1.5°C could save millions of lives every year, providing trillions of dollars in health and environmental benefits.

Replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy, energy storage and energy efficiency would create unprecedented economic opportunities. Measures must also be put in place to ensure a just transition, such as re-training and educational opportunities for workers in the coal, oil and gas industries.

READ MORE:  As ecological problems mount, listen to voices of the young

A safe climate is a vital element of the right to a healthy environment and is absolutely essential to human life and wellbeing. In today’s global climate emergency, meeting the obligations to respect, protect and fulfil human rights could help to spur the transformative changes that are so urgently required.

Thanks for dropping by! Apart from the views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed, the opinions in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation of whatever amount you can afford to sustain Aliran. Please make payments to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.

And why not become an Aliran member or subscribe to our FREE newsletters.

2
Join the conversation

avatar
750
2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Kim NY Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Kim NY

For a good perspective on all the charts and graphs climate alarmist use tony heller had done a remarkable job :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8455KEDitpU

Kim NY

In 2010 UN IPCC commissioned InterAcademy Council to study it’s processes and procedures. They were specifically asked not to review the scientific studies used to support the conclusions and policies. ( Climate change assessments Review of the processes and procedures of the IPCC – 2010)

In this study IAC specifically mentioned that much of what was stated in the policy recommendations and conclusions WERE NOT BASED ON ANY SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCES OR VERY WEAK EVIDENCES.

A lot of what was put forth in this article were based on “policy recommendations and conclusions” of the IPCC report which was NOT SUPPORTED scientifically.

If it is not then the only conclusion is that what was written was nothing more than a propaganda piece.

*** the press statement ***

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iICVJZquZaY&t=90s

*** the site **
http://www.interacademies.org/35615.aspx

*** the report ***
http://www.interacademies.org/33365/Climate-Change-Assessments-Review-of-the-Processes-Procedures-of-the-IPCC