Myth-makers: Professors, TikTok and twisted ‘history’

When academics make silly, inaccurate statements, they should be answerable to a jury of their peers, says a group of concerned academics

assorted map pieces
ANDREW NEEL/PEXELS

Follow us on our Malay and English WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram, Tiktok and Youtube channels.

By Gerak

Higher Education Minister Zambry Abdul Kadir was recently reported to have urged academics not to issue statements “outside their area of expertise”.

Although he did not name and shame, it is widely believed that Zambry was referring to at least one of a number of instances when purportedly senior academics, including a professor, made absolute ninnies of themselves and their universities.

They had released statements and TikTok videos that made unverified claims about the supposed impact and influence of Malay civilisation on the rest of the world.

The one that the minister and others were referring to was probably the recent video clip of an Arabic language professor, Solehan Yaacob, that went viral.

In it, the professor allegedly claimed that the Prophet’s wife, Siti Khadijah Khuwailid, had originated from the “Malay realm” (alam Melayu).

Realising that this video had become viral, she issued a statement that she had never made such a claim and that the video had been edited to make it appear that she had.

At any rate, she was rightly chastised by her university’s staff association, and her university had also reportedly “taken appropriate action” against her.

In line with Malaysia’s penchant for keeping things under wraps, what that action was we have not been told. Nor are we likely to.

Early on in the year, there were two similar incidents of Malaysian academics, again including a fully-fledged professor, making ‘historical’ claims about the Malays during the days of the Malacca Sultanate.

Locally based French historian Serge Jardin highlighted on his Facebook page, first in January and later in April, these pathetic attempts at rewriting history. These ‘academics’ had come up with supposed ‘evidence’ – including photographs – of Malay achievements, which clearly were not.

READ MORE:  Gerak's verdict: National Professors Council needs to go

What was shameful and unforgivable is that there was no apology from the culprits, no admission of guilt.

Even worse, their universities – public ones, mind you – went into silent mode, evidently trying very hard to hide away from the spotlight that was then shining on them for the wrong reasons.

In this latest incident, while the culprit came up with the flimsiest of excuses, at least the university’s academic staff association and, later, its management, came up with statements chastising the professor.

The more crucial matter for Gerak is the question of academic and university autonomy and taking responsibility.

We believe that, whatever the minister’s motivations for his note of censure, the responsibility for taking action on errant academic staff must be that of the university authorities and the staff association.

We also wish to stress that the ‘lanes’ scholars move in can be many and varied. Knowledge acquisition and dissemination should never be about staying within particular and narrow lanes.

After all, we constantly stress the need to be interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary in our studies and research.

The question should be about maintaining one’s credibility and applying intellectual rigour, irrespective of the lane, field or discipline we move into.

The International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) set the right tone and took the right steps in this regard, as opposed to Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) months ago. There was no beating around the bush by those responsible in this latest episode.

Indeed, where academics make silly – and clearly inaccurate – statements, they should be answerable to a jury of their peers, not to some external entity, especially a politician. Or even a minister.

READ MORE:  Lessons from Syed Husin Ali's A People’s History of Malaysia

Aside from Gerak, a number of other, admittedly muted, academic organisations really need to unmute themselves in this regard.

Indeed, we hope that, should instances like these come up again, other purportedly ‘academic’ Malaysian organisations will play their roles as senior academics.

After all, we believe that professors should profess. – Gerak

The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.
AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama
  1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat
  2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar
  3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman
  4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang
  5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme
Support Aliran's work with an online donation. Scan this QR code using your mobile phone e-wallet or banking app:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments