Movement control order: Attorney general must rein in prosecutors

On 4 April, Eliminating Deaths and Abuse in Custody Together (Edict) wrote an open letter to Attorney General Idrus Harun.

In the letter, we laid out concerns over the enforcement of the movement control order by the police and by prosecutors. We asked the attorney general to issue directions to temper justice with mercy and to assure even-handed implementation.

The letter was widely disseminated over social networks. It was also reported in local and international media. Several days have passed. Many have asked us whether the attorney general has issued any guidelines.

We have not been contacted by the attorney general. We have not received any feedback which indicates any change in the process of enforcement. We conclude that to-date, the attorney general has not addressed the concerns we raised.

We are however delighted that Chief Judge of Malaya Justice Azahar Mohamed and Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Justice Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim have directed High Courts to expedite hearings of revisions (appeals) of all movement control order-related sentences.

We are also delighted that Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat has urged judicial officers to consider the risk of transmission of Covid-19 in prisons when handing down sentences.

Edict also takes this opportunity to congratulate Prisons Department director-general Zulkifli Omar who wrote to the chief justice expressing his concerns about overcrowding of prisons. We celebrate and support his call for offenders to be sentenced to community service.

As we said at the outset, we are not aware of any actions by the attorney general which we can similarly affirm.

READ MORE:  Interview with Tommy Thomas

Sadly, we have to bring to his attention two matters which signal the urgent need for him to issue guidelines to abate disrepute brought upon the justice system by misguided movement control order enforcement.

We note the case of 20-year-old shop assistant Nursahira Mohd Mizuar, who, on 31 March, began serving a prison sentence. A Sessions Court judge sentenced her to three months in prison (in addition to a fine) after she, unrepresented by counsel, pleaded guilty to “making and initiating offensive communications” and “insulting the police” on social media.

According to news reports, the youth was venting the anger she felt over a Covid-19 operation in Batu Menunggul, Pendang, Alor Star. The youth was charged under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act.

According to a parliamentary reply, in the 12 months till October 2019, 153 cases were investigated under Section 233, but none was prosecuted. This statistic makes the jail sentence imposed upon Nursahira and the judge’s refusal to postpone it pending appeal more remarkable.

Edict has also noted that a deputy public prosecutor, on social media, has defended and goaded policemen who take it upon themselves to punish movement control order offenders through caning and other means. He claims to base his instigation upon the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act – which he reads without regard to the Constitution and other laws such as the Police Act.

Edict reminds the attorney general that the Federal Constitution imbues and entrusts him with immense power under Article 145, partly in order that excesses such as we are seeing now will be curbed.

READ MORE:  Where is justice?

Edict urges the attorney general to use those powers to abate any disrepute which may have been brought upon our justice system by misguided movement control order implementation, overzealous prosecutors and interpretation of the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act without regard for its context.

Edict trusts that the attorney general will recognise the need to avert any possible erosion of public confidence in our justice system. We hope he will spring into immediate action to uphold the rule of law and ensure that the spirit of the Federal Constitution is adhered to by all parties.

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gursharan Singh
Gursharan Singh
16 Apr 2020 11.32am

Several human rights supporters voice their concerns on the sentences imposed on those convicted in courts of law.
My concern is
WHO VOICES THE FRUSTRATIONS OF VICTIMS OF THE SENTENCED CRIMINALS?

This problem could be international and not limited to any single country.

MCO offenders is current favorite but there could also be similar bias towards rapists murderers snatchers domestic violence child slavery and other victims of fraud corruption embezzlement etc.

Bless all.