Malaysia: Human rights reforms stall

2
234
Graphic: freemalaysiatoday.com

Malaysia’s promised human rights reforms stalled in 2019 as the government either backed away from or delayed action on its campaign commitments, Human Rights Watch said in its World Report 2020.


“Malaysia’s reform process is failing because the ruling coalition’s leaders have lacked the political will to stand up for principles in the face of political opposition,” said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The government needs to make a renewed effort to follow through on its promises for human rights reforms.”

In the 652-page World Report 2020, its 30th edition, Human Rights Watch reviews human rights practices in nearly 100 countries.

In his introductory essay, executive director Kenneth Roth says that the Chinese government, which depends on repression to stay in power, is carrying out the most intense attack on the global human rights system in decades. He finds that Beijing’s actions both encourage and gain support from autocratic populists around the globe, while Chinese authorities use their economic clout to deter criticism from other governments. It is urgent to resist this assault, which threatens decades of progress on human rights and our future.

The government has undertaken some positive reform steps, such as repealing the anti-fake news law, advancing a draft law to establish an independent police complaints of misconduct commission and strengthening parliamentary independence to consider rights issues.

However, it has failed to achieve reforms in key areas such as freedom of expression, freedom of religion, and the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.

Malaysia withdrew from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in April 2019, barely a month after becoming a formal party to the treaty.

READ MORE:  Don’t use Malaysian Bar as bogeyman to seek popularity, advance individual causes

The government also retreated from a commitment to completely abolish the death penalty. It recently asserted that it will instead introduce legislation to end the mandatory application of capital punishment for various crimes.

The government has also failed to carry out commitments to abolish or reform a range of abusive laws, including the much-abused Sedition Act. The law continues to be used, particularly against those criticising Malaysia’s royalty.

Despite promising to repeal “draconian provisions” of the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act (Sosma), the government continues to use the law, which allows 28 days of preventive detention with no judicial review for a range of “security offences” and sets special procedures for trial of such cases, which violate the right to a fair trial. Twelve people, including two Democratic Action Party lawmakers, were detained under the act in October on allegations of supporting a defunct Sri Lankan rebel group.

Police abuse remains a serious problem in Malaysia, as does a lack of accountability for such abuses. In July, the government submitted a bill to create a long-sought independent police misconduct commission. However, some of the bill’s provisions raise concerns about the independence and authority of the proposed commission.

Discrimination against LGBT people in Malaysia is pervasive. Federal law punishes “carnal knowledge against the order of nature” with up to 20 years in prison, while numerous state Sharia laws prohibit both same-sex relations and non-normative gender expression, resulting in frequent arrests of transgender people. In November 2019, five men were sentenced to prison terms and six strokes of the cane for “attempted intercourse against the order of nature”. Four were caned on 19 November.

Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad and other government officials have made statements expressing a lack of support for the LGBT community. In June, Mahathir said that the discussion of LGBT rights was being promoted by “Western countries” and was “unsuitable” for Malaysia.

“The Malaysian government’s human rights record will be judged on its accomplishments, not its promises,” Robertson said. “The government can still turn its record around by standing up and acting on behalf of the country’s marginalised communities.”

Sign Aliran's 'Save our Democracy" petition
Sign Aliran's petition calling for a review of the decision to grant Riza Aziz a DNAA
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
REMO
REMO
1 Feb 2020 11.52pm

We cannot expect reform from a recycle PM from the 80s, this style is fix ready , he is [seen as] pm for Malay muslim believe in Malay supremacy , bumiputra only policy, crony economy, privatisation, bailing out … for Tabung Haji fan Felda Malay only institution , (certain) Govern kolej dan Unuversiti, Islamic Universities, UiTM [predominantly] Malays , he is fond of [allowing] repressive law on dissent, LTTE sosma arrest ala operasi lalang style and many evil agenda…

Gursharan Singh
Gursharan Singh
26 Jan 2020 10.58am

Are not any values referred to as human rights, only those which are allowed by those in power and wealthy be they in positions of leadership in countries or corporations or religions or societies?
# Will anyone in power allow any human rights if their implementation may adversely impact their wealth or power?
HUMAN RIGHTS REQUIRE SACRIFICES BY THOSE WHO WANT THEM but AFTER HAVING ACHIEVED HUMAN RIGHTS THE NEW LEADERS MAY JUST FORGET AND ADOPT CULTURE OF THOSE WHOM THEY REPLACED. [Similar to ANIMAL FARM by GEORGE ORWELL!!]
IS POLITICS WORLDWIDE NOT A GOOD EXAMPLE WHERE ONE GROUP OF RULING POLITICIANS REPLACE ANOTHER BUT CULTURE CONTINUES?