Kedah MB’s defence of Alor Setar Hindu temple demolition unacceptable, heavy handed

Many Hindu temples were built during the colonial era

Lawyers for Liberty refer to the statement by Kedah Menteri Besar Sanusi Md Nor justifying the demolition of the 78-year-old Sri Madurai Veeran temple in Alor Setar and calling for the MIC to be outlawed for criticising the demolition.

Sanusi’s statement is excessive, provocative and riddled with serious inaccuracies. He is reported to have said that “if a temple is built on land where it is not allowed to do so, then it has broken the law”.

This ignores the fact that the demolished Sri Madurai Veeran temple was built during the colonial era by railway workers; it was not illegal when it was built. To suggest or insinuate that the Hindu devotees set out to deliberately build on land that did not belong to them is a serious misrepresentation of the facts.

In fact the situation of the demolished Sri Madurai Veeran temple in Alor Setar sums up the whole fraught problem of temple demolitions in Malaysia: temples which were originally built with permission during the colonial era were rendered ‘illegal’ by subsequent land sales or transfers decades later.

The approach taken by the Kedah government in this case as well as the authorities generally, in hiding behind the ‘illegality’ of the temple structure, betrays insensitivity or ignorance of the religious sentiments of worshippers.

A temple structure cannot be treated like any other building; it carries a religious and social value of great significance to the devotees who attend it as well as the larger Hindu community in the area.

It is bad enough to have forcefully demolished the temple; it is worse to now justify it by legalistic arguments which ignore the historical context in which the temple was originally built and its religious and communal importance. To the worshippers and the local community, it adds insult to injury.

READ MORE:  Wakil rakyat yang dilantik harus peka dengan hubungan antara etnik (Malay/English)

Further, the Kedah menteri besar’ss suggestion that the MIC be outlawed for criticising the temple demolition is mischievous and heavy-handed. Freedom of speech is guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution; no organisation can be banned for the exercise of free speech.

State governments are elected by the people, and must accept and respond rationally to public criticism. They must not respond with threats of outlawry.

We urge the Kedah state government as well as other authorities in Malaysia dealing with disputes on temples to treat the matter with care, sensitivity and understanding of the circumstances and contexts in which the temples were erected.

The authorities must engage all stakeholders and intermediaries to ensure amicable resolutions and avoid at all costs forced demolitions of places of worship.

N Surendran is adviser of Lawyers for Liberty

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
loyal malaysian
loyal malaysian
7 Dec 2020 6.40am

Surendran, thank you for giving the context of how a temple can become a illegal structure over the years.
So, MIC where are you folks going to put your face now?