Handcuffs for Dr Ong, microphone for Zuraida, jail for 18-year-old youth

1
585 views

Eliminating Deaths and Abuse in Custody Together (EDICT), is alarmed by the imbalance in the treatment of Zuraida Kamaruddin, the Housing and Local Development Minister, and Dr Ong Hean Teik, a cardiologist in Penang.

Videos are circulating of Zuraida using a public address system to speak to a crowd assembled in the open, at a market in Petaling Jaya. A video also shows her, in a hazmat suit spraying “disinfectant” on a street.

She claims that spraying disinfectant reduces the risk of people contracting Covid-19. We presume her ministry is footing the bill for the operation – though she is probably seeking a “donor” to pay for it.

Medical and other expert professionals have criticised her on two principal grounds.

First, such spraying is ineffective.

Second, hazmat suits are hard to come by and are needed by frontline workers in hospitals.

Edict stresses a third ground: Zuraida, a non-expert, spoke to a public assembly – videos show and news portals report that members of the public were amongst her audience. By participating in a public assembly, she contravened the movement control order.

Worse, she is unrepentant. Probably inspired by reports of “disinfection spraying” in other countries, Zuraida insists that her actions are good.

On 1 April, in a statement, we called upon the cabinet, led by Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin to censure Zuraida.

Now, compare Zuraida’s case with that of 61-year-old cardiologist Dr Ong Hean Teik, who was charged in court for contravening the movement control order. Dr Ong was charged with not staying at home.

Dr Ong was even charged under the Criminal Procedure Code for “obstructing a public servant in the performance of his duty” – although the video of his alleged infraction shows no verbal or physical violence.

READ MORE:  Movement control order: Arrest and release immediately, probe and prosecute later

After his alleged infraction on 19 March, he was not detained. He went home. Eleven days later, on 30 March, he was charged. A news report shows him outside a court, stepping out of a police car, handcuffed.

Worse was yet to come. The maximum fine for the offence of “contravening the movement control order” is RM1,000 and the maximum fine for the offence of “obstructing a public servant” is RM10,000 – a total of RM11,000.

The magistrate set bail higher, at RM13,000, higher than the maximum fine if Dr Ong is found guilty!

Then, on 1 April, a news report appeared with the self-explanatory headline “Unable to post bail of RM800, youth is jailed because he went out to buy Maggi mee.” Man, 18 years old, is a Form Six student in Kelantan. He is being held in Marang Prison, along with 16 others who are said to have contravened the movement control order.

We summarise:

On day two of the movement control order, a senior medical professional disagreed with two officers over how to interpret the order. Eleven days later, he was remanded, handcuffed, charged in court and made to post bail of RM13,000.

On day 12 of the order, a minister launches a “disinfection operation” mocked by medical professionals, wastes precious resources and addresses a public assembly. She defends her actions! She is a free woman.

On day 15 of the order, an 18-year-old Form Six student is jailed because, out of hunger, he went out in the late evening to buy Maggi Mee.

Edict calls upon the government and public institutions such as local councils, the police and the judiciary to reflect on the unequal treatment meted out to these three persons. Learn from this. Stop this nonsense. Respect the rule of law. Show compassion.

READ MORE:  Malaysia's biggest test: Stepping out into the unknown

Zuraida must be censured by the cabinet.

Just as they did with Dr Ong, the authorities must report, charge and prosecute Zuraida. By doing so, they will demonstrate they are serious about enforcing the movement control order and will do so without fear or favour.

People like Man must be released on compassionate grounds. Justice must be tempered with mercy.

Dr Ong will have his day in court.

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gursharan Singh
Gursharan Singh
8 Apr 2020 7.30pm

While it may not appear to be fair it should be remembered that those who are rich should be given higher penalties if the penasty is to be effective.
In one Scandinavian country a speeding Ferrari owner was fined about RM800K some years ago when the common penalty rate for speeding was less than RM2K. The judge justified the RM800K penalty.
In Perils some decades ago Session Court judge had a scale for traffic speed offenders which was something like this.
For those exceeding by 20km as prescribed
Next 10km – as prescribed plus 20%
Next 10km – as prescribed plus 50%
Next 10km – as prescribed plus 100%
Next 10km – as prescribed plus 200%
BEYOND THAT – PRISON TERM.