Forbes 50 should lead donations to ‘Save Malaysia Fund’

4
1208
Malaysia's richest individuals 2018 - Image: Forbes

Let it be the wealthiest 1% who lead this campaign and let the fund be used for lifting the bottom 40% out of their poverty trap, writes Kua Kia Soong.

The prime minister has started a ‘Save Malaysia Fund’, ostensibly to help plug the apparently RM1 trillion debt gap by calling on “patriotic Malaysians” to contribute to the fund.

First, there is dispute between economists as to the actual size of the national debt depending on whether we include government guarantees and lease payments under public-private partnerships.

Then, it is clear that two important issues need clarifying:

  • how will such a ‘Save Malaysia Fund’ be used?
  • who are best positioned to lead this noble drive to “save Malaysia”?

What are we saving Malaysia from?

During the election campaign, Pakatan Harapan (PH) leaders made it clear that they could solve the economic problems of Malaysia as long as they were in charge and the country could be saved from the rotten Barisan National government.

After the general election, the new finance minister reiterated the fact that the new government could solve all the accounting problems despite the abolition of Goods and Services Tax. Just the other day, they could pull RM40m out of the hat to pay for televising the World Cup.

So what is RM145m to pay off the 1MDB bond coupon payment that is due soon? I am sure the wealthiest persons in the Council of Elders can easily write a cheque for that paltry sum considering how much they are worth.

So what is this ‘Save Malaysia Fund’?

Unless the new government specifies the specific purpose of this so-called ‘Save Malaysia Fund’, who knows how it will be spent? This is Transparency 101.

READ MORE:  SST vs GST: A false debate

I propose that considering the dire plight of the indigenous peoples and B40 in our country, this fund should be called the B40 Fund and specifically used to uplift their livelihood in a noble attempt at wealth redistribution in our society and to bring us into the high-income bracket.

Forbes 50, top 1% should lead the donations

It is a no-brainer that it should be the Forbes 50 wealthiest persons and the top 1% in our society who should show us how to “save Malaysia” from the supposed debt hole.

Since Robert Kuok is in the Council of Elders and is none other than THE richest man in Malaysia with a net worth of RM60bn, he is well suited to lead the donations.

Daim Zainuddin, the chairman of this council, is certainly one of the richest Malays in Malaysia; and he too can lead by showing us how much he is prepared to donate to this fund. In 1984, his total net assets were already estimated at nearly RM1bn.

Besides these two of Forbe’s wealthiest, Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s eldest son Mokhzani Mahathir is among Malaysia’s 50 richest with a net worth of more than RM1bn and his other son, Mirzan is certainly among the top 1% wealthiest Malaysians.

To remind Malaysians, Malaysia’s 50 richest individuals (or the top 0.0017%) have a total wealth of US$70bn or more than RM280bn while the total wealth of the bottom 40% in our society (B40) is only RM20bn!

In other words, income inequality is getting worse and there is no proper welfare system for Malaysians, the majority of whom do not earn enough to be able to have a retirement, never mind the others who lose their jobs or are retrenched. Thus, we can ‘save Malaysia’ by using the fund for a public social security or retrenchment fund for workers.

READ MORE:  Billionaire fortunes grew by US$2.5bn a day last year as poorest saw their wealth fall

Wealth redistribution is crucial to save Malaysia

For too long, the government of the day has never had the political will to initiate wealth redistribution and to narrow the gaping income inequality in this country. Surely it is time for this government of Hope to initiate this and to ensure that this fund is not siphoned off for other purposes?

Not just donations but progressive taxation

Ultimately, donations by the wealthy and charitable philanthropy will not solve the problem of growing income inequality either. The increasingly serious gap in income inequality needs to be addressed through progressive taxation on the high-income earners, their property and capital gains and effective tax laws to ensure there are no tax loopholes for the super-rich top 1%.

Rigorous legislation is also vital if we are to curb the practice of transfer pricing that enables the largest corporations to stash their profits in off-shore tax-free havens. Capital allowances and tax holidays for foreign firms must be reviewed while a tax should be imposed on all international financial transactions and hedge funds.

So, if we should have a ‘Save Malaysia Fund’ to save the nation from this debt hole, let it be the wealthiest 1% who lead this campaign and let the fund be used for lifting the B40 out of their poverty trap and bring us closer to becoming a high-income society.

Dr Kua Kia Soong is adviser of human rights group Suaram.

(Visited 1,189 times, 1 visits today)
Thanks for dropping by! Apart from the views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed, the opinions in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.

4
Join the conversation

avatar
750
4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
Joseph RealisticcPhua Kai LitTeo Chuen TickJoshua Lim Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Joseph Realisticc

I guess when it’s a ” Malaysian ” country , they will

Phua Kai Lit
Phua Kai Lit

The Fund also serves symbolic purposes lah! It allows newly energised “citoyen” (citizens –in the sense used immediately after the French Revolution) to show their patriotism and support for the new Government, promotes a sense of solidarity etc.

(Of course we know that the amount collected eventually would be small in comparison to the RM1 trillion plus public debt).

Teo Chuen Tick

It is a good call, Kua.
Let’s see how these wealthy individuals respond.

Joshua Lim

Increasing govt’s income is more important than donating money.