Drop investigation of women’s march organisers; repeal draconian Sedition Act

2
278

The Malaysian authorities should halt the investigation targeting organisers of the women’s march in Kuala Lumpur on 9 March 2019, Human Rights Watch said today.

The march’s organisers are being investigated for possible violations of the Sedition Act and Peaceful Assembly Act.

The women’s march, in observance of International Women’s Day, called for an end to violence based on gender and sexual orientation, the right of women to make choices over their bodies and lives, an end to child marriage and an end to a system of patriarchy.

“The Malaysian government promised in its election manifesto to get rid of the notorious sedition law, yet it is now using it against organisers of the women’s march,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch.

“This is shockingly hypocritical. The authorities should immediately end the investigation and restate its commitment to protecting the rights to peaceful protests and speech.”

The participants included a wide array of Malaysian citizens. Following the march, conservative groups criticised the presence of LGBT people, with the Minister for Religious Affairs, Mujahid Yusof Rawa, calling their participation an “abuse of democratic space.”

The backlash against participants has been vocal and severe, with some reporting harassment on social media, including threats of violence.

On 14 March the police called in seven organisers for questioning. In a statement, the organisers announced that they were being investigated under the Sedition Act – a law that has long been used to penalise peaceful political dissent.

The Sedition Act criminalises any conduct with a “seditious tendency,” such as broadly tending to “excite disaffection against” or “bring into hatred or contempt” the government, the judiciary, the king or the ruler of any state. The governing Pakatan Harapan coalition, recognising that the Sedition Act is “oppressive and unjust”, promised in its 2018 election manifesto to repeal it.

READ MORE:  GBM’s message for International Women’s Day 2020

The organisers are also being investigated under Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act, which requires organisers of assemblies to give police notice of any event 10 days in advance, a requirement that the government has also promised to review.

March organisers have told local media that they provided the police with notice 10 days in advance and maintained open lines of communication with the police during the event.

The Malaysian government should follow through with its campaign promises to repeal the draconian Sedition Act. It should also revise overly restrictive provisions of the Peaceful Assembly Act.

“Rather than using abusive laws against people marching for basic rights, Malaysia’s government should be addressing the critical women’s rights issues that the march highlighted,” Adams said.

“The government should use this episode as a wake-up call to accelerate efforts to repeal the Sedition Act and amend or repeal other laws restricting freedom of speech, including overly restrictive provisions of the Peaceful Assembly Act.”

Sign Aliran's 'Save our Democracy" petition
Sign Aliran's petition calling for a review of the decision to grant Riza Aziz a DNAA
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mokka Sancha Hii
16 Mar 2019 2.05pm

I wonder why in the first place they were being investigated under Seditin Act? In what way? Suka suka one ka? Without permit is more valid ? Dun understand ler

John Foo Sxhong
15 Mar 2019 3.20pm

Funny before not gov they want repeal not no more want more law to control