Courts should be given discretion in sentencing – Bar

1
81 views

It was reported that the Road Transport (Amendment) Bill 2020 was recently passed with majority support in the Dewan Rakyat on 26 August 2020.

The bill seeks to amend the Road Transport Act 1987 in order to strengthen the punishments meted out for driving under the influence — as stated under Section 44 of the act — including a minimum seven-year jail term.

The bill also amends Section 41 of the act which proposes that those charged for dangerous or reckless driving resulting in death could face a jail term of between five and 10 years, an increase from the current sentence of between two and 10 years.

While the Malaysian Bar sees the reason behind increasing sentences as a way to deter reckless drivers from consuming drugs or alcohol before driving, we are concerned that this mandatory minimum sentencing protocol will be unduly severe.

This is pertinent as offenders will be jailed for a minimum of seven years, irrespective of the severity of the injury caused and the factual matrix of each individual case.

We are also concerned that a longer mandatory imprisonment will result in disproportionate emotional and financial hardship for the families of convicted offenders.

The Malaysian Bar takes the stand that courts must be granted judicial discretion to determine the facts of each case before meting out punishment. Sentences should be handed down judiciously and proportionately to ensure justice is administered in accordance with the circumstances surrounding the offence.

Salim Bashir is president of the Malaysian Bar

This piece is reproduced from here and has been edited for style only.

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gursharan Singh
Gursharan Singh
4 Sep 2020 10.27am

Drunk drivers causing serious injuries or deaths should be subjected to mandatory death sentence as life of not only the victims may be destroyed but also family members and also others dependent on victims. Similar to those involved in drugs.
MISPLACED PERIHATIN OR HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS WHO MAY NOT HAVE BEEN HAVE HAD ANYONE CLOSE AS VICTIM OF DRUNK DRIVER’S RECKLESSNESS.
My brother died of drug addiction so no sympathy for those involved in drugs trade in any way.
I see no reason why the Malaysian Bar is concerned that this mandatory minimum sentencing protocol will be unduly severe. Like drugs lives of many are adversely impacted many innocent lives may also be impacted by drunken drivers when in accidents with fatal results.