Judicial appointments must be free from political influence by executive, legislature

2
154

The Malaysian Bar refers to news reports that Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad recently said, “Parliament will screen the candidates in the appointment of judges and for certain other posts before submitting the names to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.”

While it is timely and appropriate for Parliament to screen appointments to key positions in public institutions, this is not the case in respect of the appointment of judges.

The announcement indicates that the prime minister will no longer have a role in the appointment and promotion of judges. Nevertheless, judicial candidates should not be screened by Parliament.

The appointment of judges must be entirely free from political influence — and any perception of political influence — by the executive (including the prime minister) as well as the legislature.

The judiciary must be wholly independent from political interests and executive intervention, in order to perform its role effectively in a system of separation of powers with checks and balances, where each branch of government is able to check the powers of the other branches to prevent any abuse of power.

An independent judicial appointments commission must be established under the Federal Constitution and tasked to make recommendations directly to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. The composition of the commission must include not just representatives of the judiciary, but also all stakeholders in the administration of justice, including the Attorney General’s Chambers, the Malaysian Bar, the Advocates Association of Sarawak, the Sabah Law Society, legal academics, and civil society. The ultimate decision on appointments should rest with the commission, after which the prime minister submits the commission’s recommendation(s) to the Conference of Rulers.

READ MORE:  Chief justice, appeals court president, leave in dignity - or be dismissed disgracefully!

The Malaysian Bar calls on the government to incorporate these proposals into the reform of the judiciary, in pursuit of what is set out in Principle IV of the Latimer House Principles, namely “[a]n independent, impartial, honest and competent judiciary”, which is “integral to upholding the rule of law, engendering public confidence and dispensing justice”.

George Varughese is president of the Malaysian Bar.

23 October 2018

Thanks for dropping by! Apart from the views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed, the opinions in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation of whatever amount you can afford to sustain Aliran. Please make payments to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.

And why not become an Aliran member or subscribe to our FREE newsletters.

2
Join the conversation

avatar
750
2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Richard Ng Ting WoongKam Chee Ng Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Richard Ng Ting Woong

Absolutely right otherwise justice maybe compromise

Kam Chee Ng

To appoint judges,the government should study the back of all appointed judge,with clean and can provide their duty professionally and make their judgement without fear and favour.All remember their job is to help the country in safe and peaceful environment under the ruler of Malaysia