Poca amendments will no longer allow any opportunity to be heard

2
518
We need to avoid congestion in cells and prisons - File photo: themalaymailonline

Lawyers for Liberty views with extreme concern the proposed amendments to the Prevention of Crime Act 1959 (Poca) was recently tabled in Parliament – which will in effect worsen the already harsh detention without trial law.

Under Poca, a person who is the subject of the procedure can be detained without trial for up to two years. The detention period can then be renewed for another two years, for an indefinite number of times. Additionally, a person can also be placed under police supervision in another district, usually exiled in a remote town for a period of up to five years.

It is important to note that under the Poca procedure, there is no court trial nor any evidence provided that can stand up in a court of law to prove the detainee is guilty of any particular criminal offences. The Poca procedure offends all basic rules of natural justice, evidential requirement and due process.

The detainee instead will be subjected to an unfair and opaqu administrative detention process. The investigation by the police alleging that the detainee is a suspected criminal fit for Poca will be forwarded to an inquiry officer.

The inquiry officer will then inquire further and make a finding on whether the detainee is a member of the “registrable categories” (which would mean the person can be detained or placed under police supervision).

The finding of the inquiry officer will be forwarded to the Prevention of Crime Board, which will review the finding of the iInquiry officer and decide if the person should be detained, placed under police supervision or released.

READ MORE:  Aliran calls on police to respect people’s constitutional rights 

In essence, the detainee is subjected to a Kafkaesque secret trial where it would be impossible for him to rebut the allegations made against him as he would not know who are his accusers, the exact allegations nor the nature of the evidence against him.

The only recourse for the detainee is to apply for a judicial review against the decision of the board for non-compliance with the procedural requirements of Poca.

With the proposed amendments, the government is seeking to make a major change on the role of the inquiry officer as there will be no longer a duty for the detainee to be brought before the inquiry officer.

The inquiry officer, after receiving the police investigation report, will then ‘inquire’ and report to the board. Serious concerns must surely be raised as to how the inquiry officer can ‘inquire’ and make a ‘finding’ if the detainee under the amended procedure is not required to be brought before the officer.

Prior to the amendments, the detainee would be able to explain his side of the story to the inquiry officer [sections 6 and 9]. Further, the detainee would be able to make an application to the board for a review of the inquiry officer’s finding if he was dissatisfied with the finding [section 11].

These bare minimum ‘safeguards’ that were previously provided will now be completely lost under the new amendments. These amendments make clear that the government are not interested in upholding even the most basic principles of justice and fairness ie to allow the detainee an opportunity to be heard.

READ MORE:  Police urged to release 12 suspected of having LTTE connections

Whatever little role the inquiry officer had, under the amendments, it is now made perfunctory, a mere formality to rubber-stamp the police’s recommendation, so that the inquiry officer’s ‘finding’ can be forwarded to the board with the minimum of fuss.

The board can then make a decision whether to detain, place under police supervision or release the detainee. There is no duty for the detainee to be brought before the board to hear the detainee’s side of the story before a decision is made.

In effect, after the amendments, the detainee will be gagged, with no opportunity to explain his side of the story, completely helpless and left at the mercy of the detention authorities.

We therefore call on all parliamentarians to oppose these amendments as they would aggravate the already poor human rights record of Malaysia.

Poca in effect punishes innocent detainees and by extension, their family members. It is an insidious piece of detention-without-trial legislation that has no place in any modern democratic state that cherishes basic principles of human rights, due process and rule of law.

Eric Paulsen is executive director of Lawyers for Liberty.

Sign Aliran's 'Save our Democracy" petition
Sign Aliran's petition calling for a review of the decision to grant Riza Aziz a DNAA
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lim Oon Tin
9 Aug 2017 3.43pm

POLICE STATE !!!!
AND MORE WILL DIE IN CUSTODY.

Gunasekaran Balasundaram
8 Aug 2017 10.53pm

Pretend to remove ISA but bring more repressive laws.A wolf in sheep’s skin.Never trust BN