Reject Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement, urges CAP

0

The Consumers’ Association of Penang (CAP) is shocked that the government is making a mockery of Parliament by seeking a blank cheque for the country to be tied to the controversial Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement.

In its resolution before Parliament the government wanted a mandate to sign AND ratify the agreement. Signing before a full understanding of the implications of the host of new obligations and commitments is bad enough, but to ask Parliament to agree to ratification that is a legally binding step at this stage is tantamount to the government admitting it will disregard growing consternation from many Malaysians.

The first day of the debate in Dewan Rakyat saw several opposition members of parliament raising many issues of concern that CAP has alerted the government to over the past four years. Initial analysis of the more than 6,300 pages of text by a range of experts including several from the United Nations, academia and NGOs has confirmed all of CAP’s concerns.

Of the 30 TPPA chapters, 24 are targeted at national policies and laws that will change the structure of our national economy and even society. The full implications of what that means are not properly understood yet.

When Minister of International Trade and Industry Mustapa Mohamed displayed items from pants to a car part in his speech to Parliament to show the expected increase in exports from the agreement, he also admitted that the government-commissioned PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Malaysia report shows that Malaysia’s overall trade balance will worsen due to the agreement because of even more imports compared to exports.

READ MORE:  Hong Kong security laws: MCA man’s criticism of Santiago unwarranted

Thus even the Miti minister admits there are no gains from the trade chapters where Malaysia was supposed to benefit; so there are no benefits to outweigh the costs to Malaysia from the 24 non-trade chapters.

Besides this, Bank Negara Malaysia governor Zeti Akhtar Aziz had said that Malaysia has been driven by domestic demand for more than a decade and is no longer an export-led economy. Hence, CAP views that there is no compelling reason and justification for this deal, which is also not all about trade.

It is no comfort to consumers to have some cheaper imports when the agreement over time will result in job losses. A recent United Nations study warns that the deal would lead to employment losses in all the 12 TPP countries, totalling 771,000 lost jobs over 10 years (2015 to 2025).

CAP therefore strongly called on our MPs to reject the signing and ratification of the agreement. If a vote of conscience was not permitted to the MPs, then it is on their conscience that future generations of Malaysians will bear the burden and ultimate cost of this unconscionable “free trade agreement”.

SM Mohamed Idris is president of the Consumers Association of Penang (CAP).

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments